Tim Kinnaird1, James Cockburn2, Sean Gallagher3, Anirban Choudhury3, Alex Sirker4, Peter Ludman5, Mark de Belder6, Samuel Copt7, Mamas Mamas8, Adam de Belder2. 1. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Applied Clinical Sciences, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, UK. Electronic address: tim.Kinnaird2@wales.nhs.uk. 2. Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK. 3. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. 4. Department of Cardiology, University College Hospital, London, UK. 5. Department of Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. 6. Department of Cardiology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK. 7. Biosensors SA, Morges, Switzerland. 8. Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, UHNM, Stoke-on-Trent, UK; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Applied Clinical Sciences, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Abstract
AIMS: Access site choice for cases requiring rotational atherectomy (PCI-ROTA) is poorly defined. Using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society PCI database, temporal changes and contemporary associates/outcomes of access site choice for PCI-ROTA were studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analysed from 11,444 PCI-ROTA procedures performed in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of access site choice and its association with outcomes. RESULTS: For PCI-ROTA, radial access increased from 19.6% in 2007 to 58.6% in 2014. Adoption of radial access was slower in females, those with prior CABG, and in patients with chronic occlusive (CTO) or left main disease. In 2013/14, the strongest predictors of femoral artery use were age (OR 1.02, [1.005-1.036], P = .008), CTO intervention (OR 1.95, [1.209-3.314], P = .006), and history of previous CABG (OR 1.68, [1.124-2.515], P = .010). Radial access was associated with reductions in overall length of stay, and increased rates of same-day discharge. Procedural success rates were similar although femoral access use was associated with increased access site complications (2.4 vs. 0.1%, P < .001). After adjustment for baseline differences, arterial complications (OR 15.6, P < .001), transfusion (OR 12.5, P = .023) and major bleeding OR 6.0, P < .001) remained more common with FA use. Adjusted mortality and MACE rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary practice, radial access for PCI-ROTA results in similar procedural success when compared to femoral access but is associated with shorter length of stay, and lower rates of vascular complication, major bleeding and transfusion.
AIMS: Access site choice for cases requiring rotational atherectomy (PCI-ROTA) is poorly defined. Using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society PCI database, temporal changes and contemporary associates/outcomes of access site choice for PCI-ROTA were studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were analysed from 11,444 PCI-ROTA procedures performed in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of access site choice and its association with outcomes. RESULTS: For PCI-ROTA, radial access increased from 19.6% in 2007 to 58.6% in 2014. Adoption of radial access was slower in females, those with prior CABG, and in patients with chronic occlusive (CTO) or left main disease. In 2013/14, the strongest predictors of femoral artery use were age (OR 1.02, [1.005-1.036], P = .008), CTO intervention (OR 1.95, [1.209-3.314], P = .006), and history of previous CABG (OR 1.68, [1.124-2.515], P = .010). Radial access was associated with reductions in overall length of stay, and increased rates of same-day discharge. Procedural success rates were similar although femoral access use was associated with increased access site complications (2.4 vs. 0.1%, P < .001). After adjustment for baseline differences, arterial complications (OR 15.6, P < .001), transfusion (OR 12.5, P = .023) and major bleeding OR 6.0, P < .001) remained more common with FA use. Adjusted mortality and MACE rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary practice, radial access for PCI-ROTA results in similar procedural success when compared to femoral access but is associated with shorter length of stay, and lower rates of vascular complication, major bleeding and transfusion.
Authors: Paul Bamford; Michael David Parkinson; Brendan Gunalingam; Michael David; George Tat-Ming Lau Journal: Clin Med Insights Cardiol Date: 2019-06-07
Authors: Thomas J Ford; Adnan Khan; Kieran F Docherty; Alice Jackson; Andrew Morrow; Novalia Sidik; Paul Rocchiccioli; Richard Good; Hany Eteiba; Stuart Watkins; Aadil Shaukat; Mitchell Lindsay; Keith Robertson; Mark Petrie; Colin Berry; Keith G Oldroyd; Margaret McEntegart Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Najia A Soomro; Muhammad N Khan; Khalid Naseeb; Mahesh K Batra; Haris Majeed; Usman Bhatti; Tariq Ashraf; Musa Karim Journal: Cureus Date: 2019-12-27
Authors: Thomas A Meijers; Adel Aminian; Koen Teeuwen; Marleen van Wely; Thomas Schmitz; Maurits T Dirksen; Rene J van der Schaaf; Juan F Iglesias; Pierfrancesco Agostoni; Joseph Dens; Paul Knaapen; Sudhir Rathore; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Jan-Henk E Dambrink; Vincent Roolvink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Renicus S Hermanides; Niels van Royen; Maarten A H van Leeuwen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-07-20 Impact factor: 2.692