Literature DB >> 29653503

Systematic review of participants' attitudes towards data sharing: a thematic synthesis.

Nicola Howe1, Emma Giles2, Dorothy Newbury-Birch3, Elaine McColl4.   

Abstract

Objectives Data sharing is well established in biological research, but evidence on sharing of clinical trial or public health research study data remains limited, in particular studies of research participants' perspectives of data sharing. This study systematically reviewed international evidence of research participants' attitudes towards the sharing of data for secondary research use. Methods Systematic search of seven databases, and author-, citation- and bibliography-follow up to identify studies examining research participants' attitudes towards data sharing. Studies were thematically analysed using NVivo v10 to identify recurring themes. Results Nine studies were eligible for inclusion. Thematic analysis identified four key themes: (1) benefits of data sharing, including benefit to participants or immediate community, benefits to the public and benefits to science or research; (2) fears and harms, such as fear of exploitation, stigmatization or repercussions, alongside concerns about confidentiality and misuse of data; (3) data sharing processes, in particular the role of consent in the process; and (4) the relationship between participants and research such as trust in different types of research or organization and the relationship with the original research team. Conclusions The available literature on attitudes towards sharing data from clinical trials or public health interventions remains scant. This study has identified four themes regarding research participants' attitudes and preferences, which should be considered by policy makers, and explored with further research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitude; data sharing; research participant

Year:  2018        PMID: 29653503     DOI: 10.1177/1355819617751555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  21 in total

1.  Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.

Authors:  T G Smith; M E Dunn; K Y Levin; S P Tsakraklides; S A Mitchell; L V van de Poll-Franse; K C Ward; C L Wiggins; X C Wu; M Hurlbert; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Public attitudes towards sharing loyalty card data for academic health research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Dolan; Kate Shiells; James Goulding; Anya Skatova
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.834

3.  Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.

Authors:  Jessica Mozersky; Meredith Parsons; Heidi Walsh; Kari Baldwin; Tristan McIntosh; James M DuBois
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2020-03

4.  What Egyptians think. Knowledge, attitude, and opinions of Egyptian patients towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed S Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Ebtesam Ahmed; Walaa A Khairy; Douaa M Sayed; Rana Zaki; Merhan A Fouda; Rania M Labib
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Abhishek Pratap; Ryan Allred; Jaden Duffy; Donovan Rivera; Heather Sophia Lee; Brenna N Renn; Patricia A Areán
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01

6.  User-focused data sharing agreements: a foundation for the genomic future.

Authors:  Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-10-01

7.  Sharing linked data sets for research: results from a deliberative public engagement event in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Jack Teng; Colene Bentley; Michael M Burgess; Kieran C O'Doherty; Kimberlyn M McGrail
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2019-05-07

8.  Meta-consent for the secondary use of health data within a learning health system: a qualitative study of the public's perspective.

Authors:  Annabelle Cumyn; Adrien Barton; Roxanne Dault; Nissrine Safa; Anne-Marie Cloutier; Jean-François Ethier
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide.

Authors:  Matthew Ventresca; Holger J Schünemann; Fergus Macbeth; Mike Clarke; Lehana Thabane; Gareth Griffiths; Simon Noble; David Garcia; Maura Marcucci; Alfonso Iorio; Qi Zhou; Mark Crowther; Elie A Akl; Gary H Lyman; Viktoria Gloy; Marcello DiNisio; Matthias Briel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Discoverability of information on clinical trial data-sharing platforms.

Authors:  Paije Wilson; Vojtech Huser
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.