Literature DB >> 29653429

GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models.

Wei Chen1, Hui Li2, Enke Hou3, Shengquan Wang4, Guirong Wang3, Mahdi Panahi5, Tao Li6, Tao Peng3, Chen Guo3, Chao Niu3, Lele Xiao3, Jiale Wang3, Xiaoshen Xie3, Baharin Bin Ahmad7.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to produce groundwater spring potential maps using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence (WoE) with logistic regression (LR) and functional tree (FT) models. First, a total of 66 springs were identified by field surveys, out of which 70% of the spring locations were used for training the models and 30% of the spring locations were employed for the validation process. Second, a total of 14 affecting factors including aspect, altitude, slope, plan curvature, profile curvature, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), sediment transport index (STI), lithology, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land use, soil, distance to roads, and distance to streams was used to analyze the spatial relationship between these affecting factors and spring occurrences. Multicollinearity analysis and feature selection of the correlation attribute evaluation (CAE) method were employed to optimize the affecting factors. Subsequently, the novel ensembles of the WoE, LR, and FT models were constructed using the training dataset. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, standard error, confidence interval (CI) at 95%, and significance level P were employed to validate and compare the performance of three models. Overall, all three models performed well for groundwater spring potential evaluation. The prediction capability of the FT model, with the highest AUC values, the smallest standard errors, the narrowest CIs, and the smallest P values for the training and validation datasets, is better compared to those of other models. The groundwater spring potential maps can be adopted for the management of water resources and land use by planners and engineers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  China; Ensemble model; GIS; Groundwater spring potential; Machine learning

Year:  2018        PMID: 29653429     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Quantitative Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Comparing Statistical Index, Index of Entropy, and Weights of Evidence in the Shangnan Area, China.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Zhao Duan
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.524

2.  Hybrid Integration Approach of Entropy with Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling.

Authors:  Tingyu Zhang; Ling Han; Wei Chen; Himan Shahabi
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 2.524

3.  Novel Entropy and Rotation Forest-Based Credal Decision Tree Classifier for Landslide Susceptibility Modeling.

Authors:  Qingfeng He; Zhihao Xu; Shaojun Li; Renwei Li; Shuai Zhang; Nianqin Wang; Binh Thai Pham; Wei Chen
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Evaluating Signalization and Channelization Selections at Intersections Based on an Entropy Method.

Authors:  Yang Shao; Xueyan Han; Huan Wu; Christian G Claudel
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-18       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  Groundwater Potential Mapping Combining Artificial Neural Network and Real AdaBoost Ensemble Technique: The DakNong Province Case-study, Vietnam.

Authors:  Phong Tung Nguyen; Duong Hai Ha; Abolfazl Jaafari; Huu Duy Nguyen; Tran Van Phong; Nadhir Al-Ansari; Indra Prakash; Hiep Van Le; Binh Thai Pham
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.