Literature DB >> 29653112

A comparison of two types of running wheel in terms of mouse preference, health, and welfare.

Michael Walker1, Georgia Mason2.   

Abstract

Voluntary wheel running occurs in mice of all strains, sexes, and ages. Mice find voluntary wheel running rewarding, and it leads to numerous health benefits. For this reason wheels are used both to enhance welfare and to create models of exercise. However, many designs of running wheel are used. This makes between-study comparisons difficult, as this variability could potentially affect the amount, pattern, and/or intensity of running behaviour, and thence the wheels' effects on welfare and exercise-related changes in anatomy and physiology. This study therefore evaluated two commercially available models, chosen because safe for group-housed mice: Bio Serv®'s "fast-trac" wheel combo and Ware Manufacturing Inc.'s stainless steel mesh 5″ upright wheel. Working with a total of three hundred and fifty one female C57BL/6, DBA/2 and BALB/c mice, we assessed these wheels' relative utilization by mice when access was free; the strength of motivation for each wheel-type when access required crossing an electrified grid; and the impact each wheel had on mouse well-being (inferred from acoustic startle responses and neophobia) and exercise-related anatomical changes (BMI; heart and hind limb masses). Mice ran more on the "fast-trac" wheel regardless of whether both wheel-types were available at once, or only if one was present. In terms of motivation, subjects required to work to access a single wheel worked equally hard for both wheel-types (even if locked and thus not useable for running), but if provided with one working wheel for free and the other type of wheel (again unlocked) accessible via crossing the electrified grid, the "fast-trac" wheel emerged as more motivating, as the Maximum Price Paid for the Ware metal wheel was lower than that paid for the "fast-trac" plastic wheel, at least for C57BL/6s and DBA/2s. No deleterious consequences were noted with either wheel in terms of health and welfare, but only mice with plastic wheels developed significantly larger hearts and hind limbs than control animals with locked wheels. Thus, where differences emerged, Bio Serv®'s "fast-trac" wheel combos appeared to better meet the aims of exercise provision than Ware Manufacturing's steel upright wheels.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health; Motivation; Mouse; Preference; Welfare; Wheel running

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29653112     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  5 in total

1.  Social Buffering as a Tool for Improving Rodent Welfare.

Authors:  Melanie R Denommé; Georgia J Mason
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.706

2.  Deficit in voluntary wheel running in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain models in mice: Impact of sex and genotype.

Authors:  Katherine M Contreras; Martial Caillaud; Bradley Neddenriep; Deniz Bagdas; Jane L Roberts; Esad Ulker; Alyssa B White; Raneem Aboulhosn; Wisam Toma; Tala Khalefa; Ahd Adel; Jared A Mann; M Imad Damaj
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Conventional laboratory housing increases morbidity and mortality in research rodents: results of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Cait; Alissa Cait; R Wilder Scott; Charlotte B Winder; Georgia J Mason
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Using approach latency and anticipatory behaviour to assess whether voluntary playpen access is rewarding to laboratory mice.

Authors:  Anna S Ratuski; I Joanna Makowska; Kaitlyn R Dvorack; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Preference for Exercise vs. More Sedentary Reinforcers: Validation of an Animal Model of Tetrabenazine-Induced Anergia.

Authors:  Carla Carratalá-Ros; Laura López-Cruz; Noemí SanMiguel; Patricia Ibáñez-Marín; Andrea Martínez-Verdú; John D Salamone; Mercè Correa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.