| Literature DB >> 29652818 |
M Dolores Paredes1, Paola Romecín2, Noemí M Atucha3, Francisco O'Valle4, Julián Castillo5, M Clara Ortiz6, Joaquín García-Estañ7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: we have evaluated the antiEntities:
Keywords: acetylcholine; flavonoids; heart; kidney; nitric oxide; phenylephrine; sodium balance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29652818 PMCID: PMC5946269 DOI: 10.3390/nu10040484
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Body weight and hematocrit values in the experimental groups.
| Body Weight (g) | Hematocrit (%) | Food Intake (g/24 h) | Water Intake (mL/24 h) | Diuresis (mL/24 h) | Natriuresis (mEq/24 h) | Sodium Balance (mEq/24 h/100 g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 429.73 ± 6.36 | 47.38 ± 0.47 | 23.05 ± 0.68 | 35 ± 0.54 | 12.83 ± 1.46 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.15 ± 0.05 |
| L-N | 345.73 ± 22.29 * | 47.20 ± 1.20 | 21.1 ± 1.21 | 31.25 ± 4.7 | 7.85 ± 1.69 | 0.22 ± 0.06 | 0.43 ± 0.11 * |
| A | 426.90 ± 11.46 | 50.67 ± 2.38 | 20.83 ± 0.63 | 30 ± 0.22 | 17.37 ± 3.85 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.05 † |
| LE | 404.72 ± 16.96 | 49.83 ± 1.21 | 18.6 ± 0.49 * | 25 ± 1.67 * | 13.45 ± 2.79 | 0.33 ± 0.08 | 0.15 ± 0.11 |
| GBO | 392.65 ± 14.98 | 48.75 ± 3.35 | 16.1 ± 1.49 * | 16.88 ± 2.48 * | 10.65 ± 1.87 | 0.26 ± 0.08 | 0.17 ± 0.11 |
| COE | 399.38 ± 20.57 | 49.40 ± 1.47 | 16.58 ± 0.9 * | 31.24 ± 5.6 | 21.84 ± 4.52 | 0.24 ± 0.06 | 0.19 ± 0.04 |
Abbreviations: C, control; L-N, N(G)-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester treated group; A (Apigenin); LE (Lemon extract); GBO (Grapefruit + bitter orange extract); COE (Cocoa extract), and D (Diosmin). Data are mean ± S.E.M. * p < 0.05 vs. Control; † p < 0.05 vs. L-NAME.
Figure 1Mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the experimental groups. Abbreviations: L-NAME: (N(G)-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester), LE (Lemon extract), GBO (Grapefruit + bitter orange extract), COE (Cocoa extract). Data are mean ± S.E.M. * p < 0.05 vs. Control; + p < 0.05 vs. L-NAME.
Figure 2Sodium balance in the experimental groups. Abbreviations: L-NAME: (N(G)-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester), LE (Lemon extract), GBO (Grapefruit + bitter orange extract), COE (Cocoa extract). Data are mean ± S.E.M. * p < 0.05 vs. Control; + p < 0.05 vs. L-NAME.
Figure 3Pressor response to phenylephrine in aortic rings. Abbreviations: L-NAME: (N(G)-Nitro-l-arginine methyl ester), LE (Lemon extract), GBO (Grapefruit + bitter orange extract), COE (Cocoa extract).
Contractile response to phenylephrine and maximal relaxation to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprussside in the experimental groups.
| Phenylephrine | Acetylcholine | SNP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | pEC50 (mol/L) | Maximal Contraction (g) | Maximal Relaxation (%) | After Acute L-NAME | Maximal Relaxation (%) |
| C | −6.45 ± 0.086 | 2.37 ± 0.15 | 82.70 ± 2.50 | 27.38 ± 6.54 | 99.38 ± 1.62 |
| L-N | −6.83 ± 0.064 * | 2.54 ± 0.12 | 19.88 ± 4.14 * | 4.55 ± 2.70 * | 89.71 ± 2.03 * |
| A | −6.56 ± 0.09 † | 2.76 ± 0.37 | 35.87 ± 6.89 * | 18.47 ± 3.92 † | 96.14 ± 1.73 |
| LE | −6.77 ± 0.12 | 2.16 ± 0.10 | 31.57 ± 8.23 * | 5.74 ± 3.93 * | 91.65 ± 3.12 |
| GBO | −7.22 ± 0.18 * | 2.18 ± 0.49 | 21.96 ± 5.32 * | 7.67 ± 1.02 * | 84.74 ± 2.93 *,† |
| COE | −7.08 ± 0.14 * | 2.09 ± 0.02 | 29.63 ± 3.99 * | 13.65 ± 2.40 † | 90.50 ± 1.57 * |
| D | −7.00 ± 0.14 * | 2.01 ± 0.34 | 13.78 ± 4.77 * | 5.23 ± 1.81 * | 91.59 ± 3.13 |
Data are mean ± S.E.M. Abbreviations as in Table 1. pEC50 is the negative logarithm of the half maximal effective concentration (EC50). * p < 0.05 vs. Control; † p < 0.05 vs. L-NAME.
Figure 4Vasodilatory response to acetylcholine in phenylephrine-preconstricted aortic rings. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 5Vasodilatory response to acetylcholine in phenylephrine-preconstricted aortic rings, in the presence of acute L-NAME. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Measurements of TBARS, nitrite and proteinuria in the experimental groups.
| Plasma TBARS (nmol/mL) | Kidney TBARS (nmol/mg prot) | Urine TBARS (nmol/mg prot/24 h) | Plasma Nitrite (µg/mL) | Urinary Excretion of Nitrite (µg/24 h) | Urinary Protein Excretion (mg/24 h/kg bw) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 576 ± 65 | 1.25 ± 0.18 | 11.83 ± 1.31 | 367.58 ± 11.19 |
| L-N | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 2.0 ± 0.3 * | 437 ± 37 | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 6.39 ± 0.46 * | 468.60 ± 39.52 * |
| A | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 512 ± 46 | 1.26 ± 0.09 | 13.40 ± 1.82 † | 360.64 ± 40.15 |
| LE | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 488 ± 69 | 0.88 ± 0.04 | 11.02 ± 1.63 | 373.50 ± 61.90 |
| GBO | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 0.0 | 458 ± 51 | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 9.05 ± 1.64 | 426.51 ± 18.81 * |
| COE | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 482 ± 108 | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 14.12 ± 4.97 | 498.51 ± 67.17 |
| D | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 546 ± 78 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 12.02 ± 1.03 † | 420.13 ± 75.24 |
Data are mean ± S.E.M. Abbreviations as in Table 1. * p < 0.05 vs. control, †, p < 0.05 vs. L-NAME.
Histopathological results of the heart and aorta.
| # Infarcts | HA | FN | LWR | IVS | TAT | AOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.01 ± 0.58 | 2.41 ± 0.03 | 131.9 ± 3.1 | 110.7 ± 7.9 |
| L-N | 4.33 ± 3.84 | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 2.22 ± 0.95 | 3.20 ± 0.10 * | 176.3 ± 4.2 * | 159.1 ± 6.5 * |
| A | 0.67 ± 0.67 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.0 | 2.39 ± 0.44 | 2.62 ± 0.25 | 178.0 ± 14.8 * | 112.1 ± 5.9 † |
| LE | 3.33 ± 3.33 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.97 ± 0.10 | 2.71 ± 0.16 | 141.4 ± 2.4 *,† | 137.7 ± 3.7 *,† |
| GBO | 3.67 ± 1.86 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 1.99 ± 0.40 | 2.42 ± 0.22 † | 157.5 ± 8.5 * | 144.5 ± 9.6 * |
| COE | 2.67 ± 1.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.49 ± 0.06 | 3.11 ± 0.36 | 155.9 ± 5.4 *,† | 135.2 ± 5.4 *,† |
| D | 4.00 ± 4.00 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 2.74 ± 0.94 | 2.22 ± 0.08 † | 164.3 ± 7.2 * | 116 ± 4.4 † |
Data are mean ± S.E.M. Abbreviations as in Table 2. HA, hyaline arteriopathy; FN, fibrinoid necrosis; LWR, lumen to wall ratio of coronary arteries; IVS, interventricular septum (µm); TAT, thoracic aorta wall thickness (µm); AOT, abdominal aorta wall thickness (µm); * p < 0.05 vs. control; † p < 0.05 vs. L-NAME.
Figure 6Representative microphotographs of heart lesions. Upper left: intramyocardial artery (A) of a control non-treated rat (no morphological alterations, PAS, 10×); (B) hyaline arteriopathy (HA) in a coronary artery of L-NAME-treated rat (PAS, 10×); (C) intense vascular damage with inflammatory infiltrate (II) and myocardiocytes lesions in a L-NAME-treated rat heart (PAS, 10×); (D) fibrinoid necrosis (FN) in a coronary artery of L-NAME-treated rat (PAS, 10×).
Histopathological results of the kidney.
| LWR | HA | TC | Combined Vascular Damage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1.80 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| L-N | 1.72 ± 0.32 | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.67 ± 0.33 |
| A | 1.85 ± 0.27 | 0 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0 |
| LE | 1.07 ± 0.19 | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 0.50 ± 0.29 | 0 |
| GBO | 2.97 ± 1.07 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.37 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.33 |
| COE | 1.63 ± 0.45 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 0 |
| D | 1.53 ± 0.09 | 0.33 ± 0.33 | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.33 |
Data are mean ± S.E.M. Abbreviations as in Table 2. HA, hyaline arteriopathy; TC, tubular cilinders.
Figure 7Representative microphotographs of kidney lesions. (A) renal artery (A) of a control non-treated rat (no morphological alterations, PAS, 20×); (B) muscular hypertrophy and lumen reduction in a renal artery (V) of L-NAME-treated rat (PAS, 20×); (C) hyaline arteriopathy (HA) and lumen reduction in a renal artery of L-NAME-treated rat (PAS, 10×); (D) fibrinoid necrosis (FN) in a renal artery of L-NAME-treated rat (PAS, 20×).
Figure 8Representative microphotographs of heart and kidney lesion in the Apigenin group. (A) Less arterial and muscular injury (PAS 10×); (B) tubular cast and mild hyaline arteriopathy without fibrinoid necrosis in renal tissue (PAS, 10×).