BACKGROUND: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment for hypertension shows highly variable results. Although some patients do not show any blood pressure (BP) change and in most patients a BP reduction of at least 5 mmHg can be found, some show a reduction at least 20 mmHg. We sought to identify predictors for such a profound BP response. METHODS: Profound BP response was defined as drop of at least 20 mmHg in daytime systolic ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) 3 months after catheter-based RDN. Three different denervation devices were used for RDN, and pulse wave velocity was determined invasively in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Profound BP response was found in 33 patients. Patients with profound BP response were younger (P = 0.04), presented with higher baseline ABPM values (P < 0.001), were treated with ultrasound-based RDN and received more often a combined treatment with two different diuretics (P = 0.005 for both). After 3 months, a treatment target of daytime BP less than 135 mmHg could be achieved more frequently in patients with profound BP response (61 vs. 17%, P < 0.001). Age, use of ultrasound RDN, combined diuretic therapy and baseline BP independently predicted pronounced BP reduction. A second multivariate logistic regression model including pulse wave velocity if available identified baseline BP, pulse wave velocity and use of ultrasound denervation as independent predictors for profound BP response. CONCLUSION: Younger vascular age, higher baseline BP, treatment with ultrasound RDN and combined diuretic therapy were found as predictors for a pronounced BP reduction following RDN, improving BP control at follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) as treatment for hypertension shows highly variable results. Although some patients do not show any blood pressure (BP) change and in most patients a BP reduction of at least 5 mmHg can be found, some show a reduction at least 20 mmHg. We sought to identify predictors for such a profound BP response. METHODS: Profound BP response was defined as drop of at least 20 mmHg in daytime systolic ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) 3 months after catheter-based RDN. Three different denervation devices were used for RDN, and pulse wave velocity was determined invasively in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Profound BP response was found in 33 patients. Patients with profound BP response were younger (P = 0.04), presented with higher baseline ABPM values (P < 0.001), were treated with ultrasound-based RDN and received more often a combined treatment with two different diuretics (P = 0.005 for both). After 3 months, a treatment target of daytime BP less than 135 mmHg could be achieved more frequently in patients with profound BP response (61 vs. 17%, P < 0.001). Age, use of ultrasound RDN, combined diuretic therapy and baseline BP independently predicted pronounced BP reduction. A second multivariate logistic regression model including pulse wave velocity if available identified baseline BP, pulse wave velocity and use of ultrasound denervation as independent predictors for profound BP response. CONCLUSION: Younger vascular age, higher baseline BP, treatment with ultrasound RDN and combined diuretic therapy were found as predictors for a pronounced BP reduction following RDN, improving BP control at follow-up.
Authors: Yook Chin Chia; Wan Azman Wan Ahmad; Alan Yean Yip Fong; Azhari Rosman; Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman; Gim Hooi Choo; Soo Kun Lim; Mohammad Zawawi Abu Bakar; Tiong Kiam Ong Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 5.528
Authors: Karl Fengler; Paul Reimann; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Karl-Patrik Kresoja; Stephan Blazek; Matthias Unterhuber; Christian Besler; Maximilian von Roeder; Michael Böhm; Steffen Desch; Holger Thiele; Philipp Lurz Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Alexandru Burlacu; Crischentian Brinza; Mariana Floria; Anca Elena Stefan; Andreea Covic; Adrian Covic Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-18 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Alexander Reshetnik; Christopher Gohlisch; Christian Scheurig-Münkler; Maximilian De Bucourt; Walter Zidek; Markus Tölle; Markus van der Giet Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Manish Saxena; Roland E Schmieder; Ajay J Kirtane; Felix Mahfoud; Joost Daemen; Jan Basile; Philipp Lurz; Philippe Gosse; Kintur Sanghvi; Naomi D L Fisher; Lars C Rump; Atul Pathak; Peter J Blankestijn; Anthony Mathur; Yale Wang; Michael A Weber; Andrew S P Sharp; Michael J Bloch; Neil C Barman; Lisa Claude; Yang Song; Michel Azizi; Melvin D Lobo Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.877