Literature DB >> 29651737

Balancing statistical significance and clinical relevance.

Charity J Morgan1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29651737     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-018-1267-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Listen to the data when results are not significant.

Authors:  Catherine E Hewitt; Natasha Mitchell; David J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-05

2.  Misuse of 'trend' to describe 'almost significant' differences in anaesthesia research.

Authors:  N M Gibbs; S V Gibbs
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Negative Is Positive.

Authors:  Brennan Spiegel; Brian E Lacy
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Trap of trends to statistical significance: likelihood of near significant P value becoming more significant with extra data.

Authors:  John Wood; Nick Freemantle; Michael King; Irwin Nazareth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.