| Literature DB >> 29650959 |
Kelong Fan1, Juqun Xi2, Lei Fan3, Peixia Wang1,4, Chunhua Zhu2, Yan Tang2, Xiangdong Xu3, Minmin Liang1, Bing Jiang1,4, Xiyun Yan5,6, Lizeng Gao7.
Abstract
Nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-like activities (nanozymes), have been widely used as artificial enzymes in biomedicine. However, how to control their in vivo performance in a target cell is still challenging. Here we report a strategy to coordinate nanozymes to target tumor cells and selectively perform their activity to destruct tumors. We develop a nanozyme using nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanospheres which possess four enzyme-like activities (oxidase, peroxidase, catalase and superoxide dismutase) responsible for reactive oxygen species regulation. We then introduce ferritin to guide nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanospheres into lysosomes and boost reactive oxygen species generation in a tumor-specific manner, resulting in significant tumor regression in human tumor xenograft mice models. Together, our study provides evidence that nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanospheres are powerful nanozymes capable of regulating intracellular reactive oxygen species, and ferritinylation is a promising strategy to render nanozymes to target tumor cells for in vivo tumor catalytic therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29650959 PMCID: PMC5897348 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03903-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Morphology and N doping analysis of N-PCNSs. a HRTEM image of N-PCNSs-3. Scale bar: 100 nm. b Schematic model of nitrogen and oxygen containing surface functionality in N-PCNSs-3. c XPS survey spectra of N-PCNSs-3. d N 1 s core-level XPS spectra of N-PCNSs-3. e O 1 s core-level XPS spectra of N-PCNSs-3
Fig. 2Enzyme kinetics of N-PCNSs. a Kinetics for OXD-like activity of N-PCNSs. b Kinetics for POD-like activity of N-PCNSs. c Kinetics for CAT-like activity of N-PCNSs. d SOD-like activity of N-PCNSs. e Schematic presentation of enzyme-like activities of N-PCNSs. f, g Generation of both superoxide radicals during OXD-like catalysis as well as hydroxyl radicals during POD-like catalysis. Error bars shown represent the standard error derived from three independent measurements
Fig. 3Cellular localization of N-PCNSs in HepG2 and its effects on viability. a Effect of N-PCNSs on HepG2 cell viability (n = 6). Insert: H2O2 cytotoxic effects on HepG2. b Determination of cell membrane integrity by LDH assay. Statistical significance is assessed by unpaired Student’s two-sided t-test compared to the control group. ***p < 0.001. Mean values and error bars are defined as mean and s.d. (n = 4). c Influence of N-PCNSs treatment on mitochondrial membrane potential. Scale bar: 100 µm. d ROS level in HegG2 cells after N-PCNSs-3 stimulation. Scale bar: 20 µm. e Gene ontology analysis of biological process after N-PCNSs treatment. The changes of mRNA in responses to the hypoxia and organic cyclic compound were marked in the figure as Hypoxia and Organic cyclic compound, respectively. p values are assessed by Fisher’s exact test. f Localization of N-PCNSs in HepG2 cells. Scale bar: 10 µm. The Pearson’s coefficient of N-PCNSs and lysosome is 0.8214
Fig. 4Tumor therapy based on N-PCNSs using HFn coordination. a Schematic for N-PCNSs induced tumor cell destruction via ferritin-mediated specific delivery. b TEM image of HFn assembled onto N-PCNSs. Scale bar: 50 nm. c TEM image of cancer cells treated with HFn-PCNSs. Red arrows indicate the position of HFn-PCNSs. Scale bar: 500 nm. d Quantification of HFn-enhanced internalization of N-PCNSs by flow cytometry analysis (n = 3). Statistical significance is assessed by unpaired Student’s two-sided t-test compared to the control group. ****p < 0.0001. e Tumor morphology and progress with HFn-N-PCNSs treatment (n = 5). f Accumulation of N-PCNSs in tumors. White arrow: edge of the tumor area. Scale bar: 200 µm. g Tumor volume after i.t. treatment with HFn-N-PCNSs (n = 5). h Survival results of tumor therapy with HFn-N-PCNSs i.t. treatment (n = 5). Asterisks indicate ****p < 0.0001 for HFn-N-PCNSs-3 group compared with control groups (Kaplan–Meier). i Tumor volume after i.v. treatment with HFn-N-PCNSs (n = 5). Statistical significance is assessed by unpaired Student’s two-sided t-test compared to the control groups. ***p < 0.001. j Body weight changes of treated mice following i.v. injection of HFn-N-PCNSs (n = 5). Mean values and error bars are defined as mean and s.d., respectively. i.t. intratumorally, i.v. intravenously