Literature DB >> 29650804

Exploring Variation in Glycemic Control Across and Within Eight High-Income Countries: A Cross-sectional Analysis of 64,666 Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes.

Dimitrios Charalampopoulos1, Julia M Hermann2,3, Jannet Svensson4, Torild Skrivarhaug5, David M Maahs6, Karin Akesson7, Justin T Warner8, Reinhard W Holl2,3, Niels H Birkebæk9, Ann K Drivvoll5, Kellee M Miller10, Ann-Marie Svensson11, Terence Stephenson12, Sabine E Hofer13, Siri Fredheim4, Siv J Kummernes5, Nicole Foster10, Lena Hanberger14, Rakesh Amin12, Birgit Rami-Merhar15, Anders Johansen16, Knut Dahl-Jørgensen17,18, Mark Clements19,20,21, Ragnar Hanas22,23.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: International studies on childhood type 1 diabetes (T1D) have focused on whole-country mean HbA1c levels, thereby concealing potential variations within countries. We aimed to explore the variations in HbA1c across and within eight high-income countries to best inform international benchmarking and policy recommendations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected between 2013 and 2014 from 64,666 children with T1D who were <18 years of age across 528 centers in Germany, Austria, England, Wales, U.S., Sweden, Denmark, and Norway. We used fixed- and random-effects models adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, and minority status to describe differences between center means and to calculate the proportion of total variation in HbA1c levels that is attributable to between-center differences (intraclass correlation [ICC]). We also explored the association between within-center variation and children's glycemic control.
RESULTS: Sweden had the lowest mean HbA1c (59 mmol/mol [7.6%]) and together with Norway and Denmark showed the lowest between-center variations (ICC ≤4%). Germany and Austria had the next lowest mean HbA1c (61-62 mmol/mol [7.7-7.8%]) but showed the largest center variations (ICC ∼15%). Centers in England, Wales, and the U.S. showed low-to-moderate variation around high mean values. In pooled analysis, differences between counties remained significant after adjustment for children characteristics and center effects (P value <0.001). Across all countries, children attending centers with more variable glycemic results had higher HbA1c levels (5.6 mmol/mol [0.5%] per 5 mmol/mol [0.5%] increase in center SD of HbA1c values of all children attending a specific center).
CONCLUSIONS: At similar average levels of HbA1c, countries display different levels of center variation. The distribution of glycemic achievement within countries should be considered in developing informed policies that drive quality improvement.
© 2018 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29650804      PMCID: PMC5961394          DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  24 in total

1.  ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  Marian J Rewers; Kuben Pillay; Carine de Beaufort; Maria E Craig; Ragnar Hanas; Carlo L Acerini; David M Maahs
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Diabetes as a tracer condition in international benchmarking of health systems.

Authors:  Ellen Nolte; Chris Bain; Martin McKee
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Persistent differences among centers over 3 years in glycemic control and hypoglycemia in a study of 3,805 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the Hvidøre Study Group.

Authors:  T Danne; H B Mortensen; P Hougaard; H Lynggaard; H J Aanstoot; F Chiarelli; D Daneman; H Dorchy; P Garandeau; S A Greene; H Hoey; R W Holl; E A Kaprio; M Kocova; P Martul; N Matsuura; K J Robertson; E J Schoenle; O Søvik; P G Swift; R M Tsou; M Vanelli; J Aman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Racial-ethnic disparities in management and outcomes among children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Steven M Willi; Kellee M Miller; Linda A DiMeglio; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Jill H Simmons; William V Tamborlane; Kristen J Nadeau; Julie M Kittelsrud; Peter Huckfeldt; Roy W Beck; Terri H Lipman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Continued improvement of metabolic control in Swedish pediatric diabetes care.

Authors:  Ulf Samuelsson; Karin Åkesson; Anette Peterson; Ragnar Hanas; Lena Hanberger
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.866

6.  Metabolic control as reflected by HbA1c in children, adolescents and young adults with type-1 diabetes mellitus: combined longitudinal analysis including 27,035 patients from 207 centers in Germany and Austria during the last decade.

Authors:  E-M Gerstl; W Rabl; J Rosenbauer; H Gröbe; S E Hofer; U Krause; R W Holl
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  A1C in children and adolescents with diabetes in relation to certain clinical parameters: the Swedish Childhood Diabetes Registry SWEDIABKIDS.

Authors:  Lena Hanberger; Ulf Samuelsson; Bengt Lindblad; Johnny Ludvigsson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Childhood diabetes in the Nordic countries: a comparison of quality registries.

Authors:  Lena Hanberger; Niels Birkebaek; Ragnar Bjarnason; Ann Kristin Drivvoll; Anders Johansen; Torild Skrivarhaug; Arni V Thorsson; Ulf Samuelsson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-17

9.  Metabolic outcomes in young children with type 1 diabetes differ between treatment centers: the Hvidoere Study in Young Children 2009.

Authors:  Carine E de Beaufort; Karin Lange; Peter G F Swift; Jan Aman; Fergus Cameron; Luis Castano; Harry Dorchy; Lynda K Fisher; Hilary Hoey; Eero Kaprio; Mirjana Kocova; Andreas Neu; Pal R Njolstad; Moshe Phillip; Eugen Schoenle; Jean J Robert; Tatsuhiko Urukami; Maurizio Vanelli; Thomas Danne; Tim Barrett; Franco Chiarelli; Henk J Aanstoot; Henrik B Mortensen
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.866

10.  The establishment of a new national network leads to quality improvement in childhood diabetes: implementation of the ISPAD Guidelines.

Authors:  Hanna D Margeirsdottir; Jakob R Larsen; Siv J Kummernes; Cathrine Brunborg; Knut Dahl-Jørgensen
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 4.866

View more
  22 in total

1.  State of Type 1 Diabetes Care in the United States in 2016-2018 from T1D Exchange Registry Data.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Efficacy of the Flexible Lifestyles Empowering Change intervention on metabolic and psychosocial outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (FLEX): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; David M Maahs; Michael Seid; Jamie Crandell; Franziska K Bishop; Kimberly A Driscoll; Christine M Hunter; Jessica C Kichler; Debra Standiford; Joan M Thomas
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-07-30

3.  Hemoglobin A1c Trajectory in Pediatric Patients with Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Priya Prahalad; Jaden Yang; David Scheinker; Manisha Desai; Korey Hood; David M Maahs
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: the Pilot 4T Study.

Authors:  Priya Prahalad; Victoria Y Ding; Dessi P Zaharieva; Ananta Addala; Ramesh Johari; David Scheinker; Manisha Desai; Korey Hood; David M Maahs
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Advancements and future directions in the teamwork, targets, technology, and tight control-the 4T study: improving clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed pediatric type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Dessi P Zaharieva; Franziska K Bishop; David M Maahs
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.893

6.  Glycemic control among children and adolescents with diabetes in Southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mulugeta Sitot Shibeshi; Alemneh Kabeta Daba; Kebede Mola Meiso; Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.263

7.  Diabetes Technology and Therapy in the Pediatric Age Group.

Authors:  David M Maahs; Laya Ekhlaspour; Shlomit Shalitin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 7.337

8.  Glycaemic control trends in people with type 1 diabetes in Scotland 2004-2016.

Authors:  Colette Mair; Wahyu Wulaningsih; Anita Jeyam; Stuart McGurnaghan; Luke Blackbourn; Brian Kennon; Graham Leese; Robert Lindsay; Rory J McCrimmon; John McKnight; John R Petrie; Naveed Sattar; Sarah H Wild; Nicholas Conway; Ian Craigie; Kenneth Robertson; Louise Bath; Paul M McKeigue; Helen M Colhoun
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 10.122

9.  Heterogeneity of Access to Diabetes Technology Depending on Area Deprivation and Demographics Between 2016 and 2019 in Germany.

Authors:  Marie Auzanneau; Joachim Rosenbauer; Werner Maier; Simone von Sengbusch; Johannes Hamann; Thomas Kapellen; Guido Freckmann; Silke Schmidt; Eggert Lilienthal; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07-12

Review 10.  Improving Clinical Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control-The 4T Study.

Authors:  Priya Prahalad; Dessi P Zaharieva; Ananta Addala; Christin New; David Scheinker; Manisha Desai; Korey K Hood; David M Maahs
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.