Literature DB >> 29650699

Update of an occupational asthma-specific job exposure matrix to assess exposure to 30 specific agents.

Nicole Le Moual1,2, Jan-Paul Zock3,4,5, Orianne Dumas1,2, Theodore Lytras3,4, Eva Andersson6, Linnéa Lillienberg6, Vivi Schlünssen7, Geza Benke8, Hans Kromhout9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to update an asthmagen job exposure matrix (JEM) developed in the late 1990s. Main reasons were: the number of suspected and recognised asthmagens has since tripled; understanding of the aetiological role of irritants in asthma and methodological insights in application of JEMs have emerged in the period.
METHODS: For each agent of the new occupational asthma-specific JEM (OAsJEM), a working group of three experts out of eight evaluated exposure for each International Standard Classification of Occupations, 1988 (ISCO-88) job code into three categories: 'high' (high probability of exposure and moderate-to-high intensity), 'medium' (low-to-moderate probability or low intensity) and 'unexposed'. Within a working group, experts evaluated exposures independently from each other. If expert assessments were inconsistent the final decision was taken by consensus. Specificity was favoured over sensitivity, that is, jobs were classified with high exposure only if the probability of exposure was high and the intensity moderate-to-high. In the final review, all experts checked assigned exposures and proposed/improved recommendations for expert re-evaluation after default application of the JEM.
RESULTS: The OAsJEM covers exposures to 30 sensitisers/irritants, including 12 newly recognised, classified into seven broad groups. Initial agreement between the three experts was mostly fair to moderate (κ values 0.2-0.5). Out of 506 ISCO-88 codes, the majority was classified as unexposed (from 82.6% (organic solvents) to 99.8% (persulfates)) and a minority as 'high-exposed' (0.2% (persulfates) to 2.6% (organic solvents)).
CONCLUSIONS: The OAsJEM developed to improve occupational exposure assessment may improve evaluations of associations with asthma in epidemiological studies and contribute to assessment of the burden of work-related asthma. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asthma; asthmagens; job-exposure matrix; occupational exposure assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29650699     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2017-104866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  15 in total

Review 1.  Parental Occupational Exposure and Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Offspring: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Bemanalizadeh; Mehri Khoshhali; Parvin Goli; Ibrahim Abdollahpour; Roya Kelishadi
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 2.  Use of population data for assessing trends in work-related asthma mortality.

Authors:  Jacek M Mazurek; Paul K Henneberger
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-04

3.  The Impact of Interleukin (IL)-33 Gene Polymorphisms and Environmental Factors on Risk of Asthma in the Iranian Population.

Authors:  Mojdeh Matloubi; Maral Ranjbar; Mohammad-Ali Assarehzadegan; Morteza Fallahpour; Fatemeh Sadeghi; Saeed Soleyman-Jahi; Leila Janani
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Influence of Childhood Asthma and Allergies on Occupational Exposure in Early Adulthood: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Orianne Dumas; Nicole Le Moual; Adrian J Lowe; Caroline J Lodge; Jan-Paul Zock; Hans Kromhout; Bircan Erbas; Jennifer L Perret; Shyamali C Dharmage; Geza Benke; Michael J Abramson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Dermatitis among workers in Ontario: results from the Occupational Disease Surveillance System.

Authors:  Sharara Shakik; Victoria Arrandale; Dorothy Linn Holness; Jill S MacLeod; Christopher B McLeod; Alice Peter; Paul A Demers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Parental occupational exposure pre- and post-conception and development of asthma in offspring.

Authors:  Kathrine Pape; Cecile Svanes; Camilla S Sejbæk; Andrei Malinovschi; Byndis Benediktsdottir; Bertil Forsberg; Christer Janson; Geza Benke; Gro Tjalvin; José Luis Sánchez-Ramos; Jan-Paul Zock; Kjell Toren; Lennart Bråbäck; Mathias Holm; Rain Jõgi; Randi J Bertelsen; Thorarin Gíslason; Torben Sigsgaard; Xiaoqin Liu; Karin S Hougaard; Ane Johannessen; Caroline Lodge; Shyamali C Dharmage; Vivi Schlünssen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Third Follow-Up of the Study on Occupational Allergy Risks (SOLAR III) in Germany: Design, Methods, and Initial Data Analysis.

Authors:  Felix Forster; Sylvia Kreißl; Laura Wengenroth; Christian Vogelberg; Erika von Mutius; Bianca Schaub; Dennis Nowak; Tobias Weinmann; Katja Radon; Jessica Gerlich
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04

8.  Occupational exposures and exacerbations of asthma and COPD-A general population study.

Authors:  Stinna Skaaby; Esben Meulengracht Flachs; Peter Lange; Vivi Schlünssen; Jacob Louis Marott; Charlotte Brauer; Børge G Nordestgaard; Steven Sadhra; Om Kurmi; Jens Peter Ellekilde Bonde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Developing a Job Exposure Matrix of Work Organization Hazards in the United States: A Review on Methodological Issues and Research Protocol.

Authors:  BongKyoo Choi
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2020-06-09

10.  Airborne occupational exposures and inflammatory biomarkers in the Lifelines cohort study.

Authors:  Md Omar Faruque; Judith M Vonk; Ute Bültmann; H Marike Boezen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.