Literature DB >> 29650492

Robotically-driven orthoses exert proximal-to-distal differential recovery on the lower limbs in children with hemiplegia, early after acquired brain injury.

Elena Beretta1, Erika Molteni2, Emilia Biffi3, Roberta Morganti2, Paolo Avantaggiato2, Sandra Strazzer2.   

Abstract

Robotically-driven orthoses (RDO) are promising for treating gait impairment in children with hemiplegia after acquired brain injury (ABI). Despite this, existing literature on the employment of RDO in ABI is scanty, and cohorts' age spans throughout the adult age, with no specific focus on the developmental age. We aim to compare a treatment solely based on conventional physiotherapy (CP) with a program combining RDO training with CP, and to examine the effect of time following ABI on recovery. A prospective two-cohorts study was conducted in a rehabilitation hospital. Post-acute and chronic children with hemiplegia due to ABI underwent either: (i) 20 sessions of RDO plus 20 sessions of CP (n = 29), or (ii) 40 of CP (n = 12). Gross Motor Function Measures (GMFM), Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), 6 Minutes Walk Test and gait analysis (GA) parameters were recorded before and after training. Over all the patients in RDO + CP group, all GMFM domains and FAQ improved after RDO training (p < 0.05). The unaffected limb showed significantly decreased stance, increased step length and reduced anteroposterior center of pressure oscillation; the affected side increased the stride length. ROM hip and knee flex-extension increased bilaterally (p < 0.05 for all). RDO training during the acute/subacute post-injury phase increased motor functional abilities, cadence and velocity of gait (p < 0.05). We conclude that RDO imposes a proximal-to-distal differential effect on the lower limbs, with the hip joint being the most stimulated. RDO training fostered recovery, increasing the quality of gait on the unaffected side. Planning RDO early in the rehabilitation course of pediatric ABI is advantageous. RDO + CP may extend rehabilitation efficacy to the proximal segment of leg and to gait velocity.
Copyright © 2018 European Paediatric Neurology Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait analysis; Pediatric acquired brain injury; Pediatric neurorehabilitation; Robotic driven orthosis; Robotic-assisted gait training; Time from acquired brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29650492     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Neurol        ISSN: 1090-3798            Impact factor:   3.140


  4 in total

Review 1.  Settings matter: a scoping review on parameters in robot-assisted gait therapy identifies the importance of reporting standards.

Authors:  Florian van Dellen; Rob Labruyère
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.208

2.  Wearable Inertial Sensors to Assess Gait during the 6-Minute Walk Test: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fabio Alexander Storm; Ambra Cesareo; Gianluigi Reni; Emilia Biffi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Minimum Clinically Important Difference of Gross Motor Function and Gait Endurance in Children with Motor Impairment: A Comparison of Distribution-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Fabio Alexander Storm; Maurizio Petrarca; Elena Beretta; Sandra Strazzer; Luigi Piccinini; Cristina Maghini; Daniele Panzeri; Claudio Corbetta; Roberta Morganti; Gianluigi Reni; Enrico Castelli; Flaminia Frascarelli; Alessandra Colazza; Giampietro Cordone; Emilia Biffi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Robotic devices for paediatric rehabilitation: a review of design features.

Authors:  Alberto Gonzalez; Lorenzo Garcia; Jeff Kilby; Peter McNair
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.819

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.