| Literature DB >> 29650043 |
Christian Visscher1, Anne Kruse2, Saara Sander2, Christoph Keller3, Jasmin Mischok2, Robert Tabeling4, Hubert Henne5, Ricarda Deitmer6, Josef Kamphues2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lawsonia intracellularis is one of the most economically important pathogens in swine production. This study tested the hypothesis that the composition of diets for pigs has an impact on the excretion of L. intracellularis in a natural infection model.Entities:
Keywords: Boar; Diet; Infection; Lawsonia intracellularis; Whey
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29650043 PMCID: PMC5898007 DOI: 10.1186/s13028-018-0378-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
Experimental design concerning number of animals, repetitions and group size
| Item | Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP | CM | CORN | WHEY | RPS | |
| Group size | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Repetitions/treatment | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Total no. of animals | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
FP fine pelleted diet, CM coarse meal diet, CORN meal diet with 22% cracked corn; WHEY meal diet with 16.9% dried whey, RPS meal diet with 30% raw potato starch
Ingredient and nutrient composition of the experimental diets offered in the experimental period
| Item | Diet | FP | CM | CORN | WHEY | RPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diet composition (%) | ||||||
| Wheat | 40.0 | 40.0 | 27.7 | 32.4 | 23.5 | |
| Barley | 39.3 | 39.3 | 30.0 | 32.2 | 19.0 | |
| Soybean meal | 16.0 | 16.0 | 16.7 | 15.0 | 15.0 | |
| Corn | – | – | 22.0 | – | – | |
| Whey powder | – | – | – | 16.9 | – | |
| Potato starch | – | – | – | – | 30.0 | |
| Wheat gluten | 6.00 | |||||
| Soybean oil | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 3.00 | |
| | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.30 | |
| Methionine | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |
| Salt | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | ||
| Monocalcium phosphate | – | – | – | – | 0.80 | |
| Mineral feeda | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.70 | 2.00 | |
| Sodium chloride | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | |
| Analysed nutrient composition (g/kg DM) | ||||||
| ME (MJ/kg DM) | 15.6 | 15.5 | 15.5 | 15.2 | 16.1 | |
| Crude ash | 46.8 | 46.7 | 46.5 | 50.6 | 44.8 | |
| Crude fat | 41.7 | 42.1 | 34.8 | 33.1 | 50.2 | |
| Crude fibre | 34.5 | 40.0 | 36.2 | 33.6 | 28.3 | |
| Crude protein | 192 | 187 | 187 | 181 | 189 | |
| Starch | 482 | 487 | 526 | 405 | 546 | |
| Sugar | 44.1 | 39.5 | 39.1 | 125 | 31.0 | |
| Ca | 6.90 | 7.15 | 6.95 | 7.45 | 8.65 | |
| P | 4.40 | 4.45 | 5.10 | 5.55 | 5.85 | |
| Mg | 1.90 | 2.00 | 2.05 | 1.90 | 1.65 | |
| K | 6.90 | 6.70 | 6.95 | 10.7 | 5.60 | |
| Na | 2.60 | 3.00 | 2.65 | 2.50 | 2.55 | |
| Lysine | 13.8 | 13.5 | 12.7 | 12.5 | 12.9 | |
FP fine pelleted diet, CM coarse meal diet, CORN meal diet with 22% cracked corn, WHEY meal diet with 16.9% dried whey, RPS meal diet with 30% raw potato starch
aSupplement containing (per kg): Ca 24.50%; P 2.40%; Na 5.10%; Lysine 6.60%; Methionine 1.50%; Threonine 1.00%; 450,000 IU vitamin A; 50,000 IU vitamin D3; 2950 mg vitamin E; 4000 mg Fe; 3500 mg Mn; 3500 mg Zn; 600 mg Cu; 60 I; 13 mg Se; 5 mg Co; 20,000 IU phytases
Body weight, average daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio in finishing boars (n = 10/treatment) fed diets with different compositions during the 4-week trial period
| Item | Time | Treatment | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP | CM | CORN | WHEY | RPS | |||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Body weight (kg) | TP1 (start) | 98.7 | 6.97 | 97.0 | 6.85 | 99.1 | 6.77 | 97.0 | 7.77 | 96.1 | 8.12 |
| TP6 (final)a | 138 | 13.7 | 135 | 8.22 | 136 | 7.48 | 133 | 10.1 | 129 | 13.1 | |
| ADWG (kg) | Ø TP2–5 (week 1–4) | 1.326 | 0.272 | 1.273 | 0.161 | 1.225 | 0.164 | 1.208 | 0.250 | 1.104 | 0.336 |
| ADFI (kg DM) | Ø TP2–5 (week 1–4) | 3084 | 3217 | 3242 | 3261 | 2861 | |||||
| FCR (kg/kg) | Ø TP2–5 (week 1–4) | 2.64 | 2.87 | 2.93 | 2.94 | 2.94 | |||||
FP fine pelleted diet, CM coarse meal diet, CORN meal diet with 22% cracked corn, WHEY meal diet with 16.9% dried whey, RPS meal diet with 30% raw potato starch, ADWG average daily weight gain, FCR feed conversion ratio in kg diet per kg weight gain, Ø abbreviation for mean value, TP1 time point 1 (start), TP2 (week 1), TP3 (week 2), TP4 (week 3), TP5 (week 4), TP6 (slaughter)
a30 days later; no significant differences between values in a row detectable at P < 0.05
Results of serological investigations, analyses in faeces (qPCR Lawsonia intracellularis and DM) as well as counts of L. intracellularis and concentrations of short chain fatty acids in caecal content and cecal crypt depth in groups of finishing boars (n = 10/treatment) fed diets with different compositions
| Item | Time | Treatment | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FP Mean | SD | CM Mean | SD | CORN Mean | SD | WHEY Mean | SD | RPS Mean | SD | ||
| Blood | |||||||||||
| PI values blocking ELISA | TP1 (start) | 31.0B | 12.9 | 30.5B | 16.9 | 25.5B | 13.1 | 29.0B | 14.7 | 32.9B | 14.6 |
| TP6 (final) | 53.7A | 10.3 | 50.1A | 10.3 | 57.9A | 4.84 | 57.3A | 3.92 | 58.7A | 7.15 | |
| Δ TP1 to TP6† | 22.7 | 18.9 | 19.6 | 23.3 | 32.4 | 14.2 | 28.3 | 16.2 | 25.8 | 17.6 | |
| Faeces | |||||||||||
| log10 GE | TP1 (start) | 2.46AB | 2.64 | 3.58AB | 2.54 | 3.43 | 2.37 | 2.30 | 3.16 | 2.58B | 2.73 |
| TP2 (week 1) | 1.08B | 2.32 | 1.54BC | 2.48 | 2.52 | 2.68 | 3.75 | 3.51 | 1.90B | 2.46 | |
| TP3 (week 2) | 4.32A | 3.16 | 0.59C | 1.87 | 3.06 | 3.32 | 4.11 | 2.99 | 2.45B | 3.33 | |
| TP4 (week 3) | 3.64AB | 3.23 | 5.83A | 2.36 | 5.06 | 3.09 | 5.05 | 3.28 | 7.25A | 1.44 | |
| TP5 (week 4) | 4.55A | 3.33 | 4.27A | 3.35 | 4.98 | 3.42 | 3.11 | 3.37 | 5.46A | 3.85 | |
| Ø TP2–5 (weeks 1–4) | 3.40 | 3.23 | 3.03 | 3.25 | 3.78 | 3.19 | 3.95 | 3.23 | 4.08 | 3.59 | |
| ∆ (Ø TP2–5−TP1) | 0.93 | 3.14 | − 0.57 | 3.30 | 0.38 | 2.65 | 1.68 | 3.58 | 1.51 | 3.80 | |
| DM content (g/kg) | TP1 (start) | 237 | 78.9 | 247 | 24.7 | 254 | 28.8 | 248 | 84.7 | 240 | 29.1 |
| TP2 (week 1) | 273a | 40.9 | 248bc | 10.1 | 266ab | 24.8 | 241c | 19.9 | 238c | 32.1 | |
| TP3 (week 2) | 259 | 84.7 | 238 | 18.0 | 257 | 97.7 | 245 | 16.7 | 214 | 18.1 | |
| TP4 (week 3) | 274a | 49.2 | 249ab | 24.0 | 246ab | 17.9 | 241ab | 16.8 | 226b | 55.4 | |
| TP5 (week 4) | 268a | 27.4 | 245ab | 17.7 | 263a | 24.6 | 245ab | 17.5 | 222b | 25.9 | |
| Ø TP2–5 (weeks 1–4) | 269a | 53.0 | 245bc | 17.9 | 258ab | 51.16 | 243bc | 17.2 | 225c | 35.4 | |
| Caecal content or rather caecal wall | |||||||||||
| log10 GE | TP6 | 4.34ab | 3.83 | 5.46a | 3.03 | 5.16ab | 3.63 | 1.57b | 3.32 | 5.82a | 3.51 |
| Starch g/kg DM) | TP6 | 41.4b | 7.97 | 164a | 35.4 | 136a | 40.6 | 85.1b | 22.4 | 179a | 110 |
| Acetate (mmol/kg FM) | TP6 | 148 | 6.64 | 145 | 8.07 | 131 | 14.4 | 143 | 6.90 | 136 | 27.1 |
| Propionate (mmol/kg FM) | TP6 | 50.5 | 3.98 | 53.8 | 5.82 | 51.0 | 3.03 | 49.4 | 2.80 | 48.6 | 9.28 |
| Butyrate (mmol/kg FM) | TP6 | 20.3b | 3.32 | 24.8b | 3.83 | 21.2b | 8.38 | 24.4b | 6.09 | 33.7a | 9.53 |
| Crypt depth caecum (μm) | TP6 | 482b | 57.5 | 473b | 50.0 | 499b | 106 | 475b | 66.0 | 570a | 189 |
Upper case letters (A, B) signify differences in columns (vertical) on the level of a specific feeding group between TPs (between TP1 and TP6 for “PI values blocking ELISA”; between TP1–5 for “log10 GE L. intracellularis”, between TP1–5 for “DM content”) depending on time point at P < 0.05
Lower case letters (a, b, c) signify differences in a row (horizontal) between feeding groups on parameter and TP-level at P < 0.05
FP fine pelleted diet, CM coarse meal diet, CORN meal diet with 22% cracked corn, WHEY meal diet with 16.9% dried whey, RPS meal diet with 30% raw potato starch, Ø abbreviation for mean value, TP1 time point 1 (start); TP2 (week 1), TP3 (week 2), TP4 (week 3), TP5 (week 4), TP6 (slaughter), PI percent inhibition, cut-off values for the blocking ELISA test with a cut-off value of PI 30, GE genome equivalents per gramme faeces, †30 days later
Crosstab regarding intercorrelations between Lawsonia intracellularis status, DM content in faeces, volatile fatty acid concentrations in caecal content and ADWG in finishing boars with natural L. intracellularis infection
Ø abbreviation for mean value, TP1 time point 1 (start); TP2 (week 1), TP3 (week 2), TP4 (week 3), TP5 (week 4), TP6 (slaughter), L.i. L. intracellularis, PI percent inhibition, cut-off values for the blocking ELISA test with a cut-off value of PI 30, r Correlation coefficient
P P value, statistical significance is based on P values smaller than 0.05 (italics)
aPearson correlation coefficients—for combination of parameters between grey boxes; Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients—combination of unshaded boxes); correlations: 0.00–0.19 “very weak”; 0.20–0.39 “weak”; 0.40–0.59 “moderate”; 0.60–0.79 “strong”; 0.80–1.0 “very strong”
Crosstab regarding intercorrelations between Lawsonia intracellularis status, DM content in faeces, volatile fatty acid concentrations in caecal content and ADWG in finishing boars with natural L. intracellularis infection
FP fine pelleted diet, CM coarse meal diet, CORN meal diet with 22% cracked corn, WHEY meal diet with 16.9% dried whey, RPS meal diet with 30% raw potato starch; TP1 time point 1 (start), TP2 (week 1), TP3 (week 2), TP4 (week 3), TP5 (week 4), TP 6 (slaughter); L.i. L. intracellularis, PI percent inhibition, cut-off values for the blocking ELISA test with a cut-off value of PI 30, r Correlation coefficient
P P value, statistical significance is based on P values smaller than 0.05 (italics)
Pearson correlation coefficients—grey boxes; Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients—unshaded boxes); correlations: 0.00–0.19 “very weak”; 0.20–0.39 “weak”; 0.40–0.59 “moderate”; 0.60–0.79 “strong”; 0.80–1.0 “very strong”