Literature DB >> 29649387

Multi-Omics Research Trends in Sepsis: A Bibliometric, Comparative Analysis Between the United States, the European Union 28 Member States, and China.

Nikolaos Evangelatos1,2,3, Kapaettu Satyamoorthy4, Georgia Levidou5, Pia Bauer2, Helmut Brand6, Christina Kouskouti7, Hans Lehrach8, Angela Brand1,9.   

Abstract

"-Omics" research is in transition with the recent rise of multi-omics technology platforms. Integration of "-omics" and multi-omics research is of high priority in sepsis, a heterogeneous syndrome that is widely recognized as a global health burden and a priority biomedical funding field. We report here an original study on bibliometric trends in the use of "-omics" technologies, and multi-omics approaches in particular, in sepsis research in three (supra)national settings, the United States, the European Union 28 Member States (EU-28), and China. Using a 5-year longitudinal bibliometric study design from 2011 to 2015, we analyzed the sepsis-related research articles in English language that included at least one or multi-omics technologies in publicly available form in Medline (free full texts). We found that the United States has had the lead (almost one-third of publications) in the inclusion of an "-omics" or multi-omics technology in sepsis within the study period. However, both China and the EU-28 displayed a significant increase in the number of publications that employed one or more types of "-omics" research (p < 0.005), while the EU-28 displayed a significant increase especially in multi-omics research articles in sepsis (p < 0.05). Notably, more than half of the multi-omics research studies in the sepsis knowledge domain had a university or government/state funding source. Among the multi-omics research publications in sepsis, the combination of genomics and transcriptomics was the most frequent (40.5%), followed by genomics and proteomics (20.4%). We suggest that the lead of the United States in the field of "-omics" and multi-omics research in sepsis is likely at stake, with both the EU-28 and China rapidly increasing their research capacity. Moreover, "triple omics" that combine genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses appear to be uncommon in sepsis, and yet much needed for triangulation of systems science data. These observations have implications for "-omics" technology policy and global research funding strategic foresight.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioeconomy; funding sources; multi-omics; research policy; sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29649387     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2017.0192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of severe respiratory infections in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Lene Russell; Andry Van de Louw; Victoria Metaxa; Philippe Bauer; Pedro Povoa; José Garnacho Montero; Ignacio Martin Loeches; Sangeeta Mehta; Kathryn Puxty; Peter Schellongowski; Jordi Rello; Djamel Mokart; Virginie Lemiale; Adrien Mirouse
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Using RNA-Seq to Investigate Immune-Metabolism Features in Immunocompromised Patients With Sepsis.

Authors:  Po-Liang Cheng; Hsin-Hua Chen; Yu-Han Jiang; Tzu-Hung Hsiao; Chen-Yu Wang; Chieh-Liang Wu; Tai-Ming Ko; Wen-Cheng Chao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 3.  The Supportive Role of International Government Funds on the Progress of Sepsis Research During the Past Decade (2010-2019): A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Yuxin Leng; Chengjin Gao; Fang Li; Enzhong Li; Fengzhu Zhang
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Precision Public Health in China: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Zhuo Chen
Journal:  China CDC Wkly       Date:  2022-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.