Literature DB >> 29645355

European experience of robot-assisted kidney transplantation: minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Angelo Territo1, Lluis Gausa1, Antonio Alcaraz2, Mireia Musquera2, Nicolas Doumerc3, Karel Decaestecker4, Liesbeth Desender5, Michael Stockle6, Martin Janssen6, Paolo Fornara7, Nasreldin Mohammed7, Giampaolo Siena8, Sergio Serni8, Selcuk Sahin9, Volkan Tuǧcu9, Giuseppe Basile1, Alberto Breda1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate functional results, graft survival and late complications in patients who underwent robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) and who had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up data, and to analyse the correlations between surgical data and functional results at a minimum of 1-year postoperatively and between renal function in the immediate postoperative period and after 1 year.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A common prospectively collected RAKT database was created by the European Robotic Urological Section (ERUS) RAKT working group, which included eight different European centres. In each centre RAKTs were performed with kidneys from living donors. Data on demographic variables, surgical results, graft survival, functional outcomes (creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]) on postoperative days 7 and 30 and at 1 year, and late complications were extracted from the common database.
RESULTS: A total of 147 RAKTs were performed by the ERUS RAKT working group. Of the 147 patients, 83 had at least 1-year follow-up (mean [range] 21 [13-27] months). Of these 83 patients, 30 were women. The patients' median (range) age was 43 (30-75) years, body mass index was 25.3 (20-40) kg/m2 , pre-transplantation serum creatinine was 517 (198-1 414) μmol/L and estimated GFR (eGFR) was 10 (3-29) mL/min per 1.73 m2 . Of the 83 cases, 46 were pre-emptive. The median (range) overall ischaemia time was 116 (53-377) min. The median (range) rewarming time was 60 (35-110) min. At 1-year follow-up, the median (range) serum creatinine was 131 (66-244) μmol/L, with a median (range) eGFR of 57.4 (28-97) mL/min per 1.73 m2 . There was no statistically significant difference between functional data at postoperative day 30 and those at 1 year for creatinine (P = 0.78) or eGFR (P = 0.91). Regarding the correlation between the surgical data and the functional outcomes, the data showed that overall operating time and rewarming time did not affect the graft function at 1 year. Three cases of graft loss occurred as a result of massive arterial thrombosis within the first postoperative week. Late complications comprised one case of ureteric stenosis and one case of graft pyelonephritis. No late vascular complications or cases of incisional hernia were recorded.
CONCLUSION: Findings at 1-year follow-up indicate RAKT from a living donor to be a safe procedure in a properly selected group of recipients. RAKT was associated with a low complication rate and there was maintenance of excellent graft survival and function. This is the first and largest study to report functional results after RAKT from a living donor with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional results; graft survival; kidney transplantation; robot-assisted kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29645355     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Minimally invasive robotic versus conventional open living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Ulrich Pein; Matthias Girndt; Silke Markau; Annekathrin Fritz; Alberto Breda; Michael Stöckle; Nasreldin Mohammed; Felix Kawan; Andre Schumann; Paolo Fornara; Karl Weigand
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Robotic-assisted kidney transplant: a single center experience with median follow-up of 2.8 years.

Authors:  Arvind Ganpule; Abhijit Patil; Abhishek Singh; Mihir Desai; Inderbir Gill; Ravindra Sabnis; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Robotic-assisted kidney transplantation in obese recipients compared to non-obese recipients: the European experience.

Authors:  Thomas Prudhomme; Jean Baptiste Beauval; Marine Lesourd; Mathieu Roumiguié; Karel Decaestecker; Graziano Vignolini; Riccardo Campi; Sergio Serni; Angelo Territo; Luis Gausa; Volkan Tugcu; Selcuk Sahin; Antonio Alcaraz; Mireia Musquera; Michael Stockle; Martin Janssen; Paolo Fornara; Nasreldin Mohammed; Arnaud Del Bello; Nassim Kamar; Federico Sallusto; Alberto Breda; Nicolas Doumerc
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Living Donor Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation: a New Standard of Care?

Authors:  Andrea Gallioli; Juan Gómez Rivas; Alessandro Larcher; Alberto Breda
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Comparison of Open and Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in terms of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Serdar Karadag; Mithat Eksi; Osman Ozdemir; Taner Kargi; Ahmet Haciislamoglu; Ismail Evren; Hakan Polat; Dogukan Sokmen; Deniz Noyan Ozlu; Selcuk Sahin; Volkan Tugcu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.149

6.  Prospective comparative study of postoperative systemic inflammatory syndrome in robot-assisted vs. open kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Angelo Territo; Romain Boissier; Jose Daniel Subiela; Andrea Gallioli; Iacopo Meneghetti; Gerit Theil; Federica Regis; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara; Lluis Gausa; Lluis Guirado; Alberto Breda
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 7.  [Robots in urology-an analysis of current and future devices].

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; A S Goezen; M C Rassweiler-Seyfried; E Liatsikos; T Bach; J-U Stolzenburg; J Klein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Robot-Assisted versus Conventional Open Kidney Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guangxiang Liu; Yongming Deng; Shenjie Zhang; Tingshen Lin; Hongqian Guo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Pediatric Challenges in Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Julien Grammens; Michal Yaela Schechter; Liesbeth Desender; Tom Claeys; Céline Sinatti; Johan VandeWalle; Frank Vermassen; Ann Raes; Caroline Vanpeteghem; Agnieszka Prytula; Mesrur Selçuk Silay; Alberto Breda; Karel Decaestecker; Anne-Françoise Spinoit
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-03-25

10.  Robotic Kidney Transplantation in an Athlete With End-stage Renal Disease. A Case Report.

Authors:  Mauro Frongia; Andrea Solinas; Rossano Cadoni; Stefano Malloci
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.