Literature DB >> 29645265

The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth.

R Davis-Floyd1.   

Abstract

This article describes three paradigms of health care that heavily influence contemporary childbirth, most particularly in the west, but increasingly around the world: the technocratic, humanistic, and holistic models of medicine. These models differ fundamentally in their definitions of the body and its relationship to the mind, and thus in the health care approaches they charter. The technocratic model stresses mind-body separation and sees the body as a machine; the humanistic model emphasizes mind-body connection and defines the body as an organism; the holistic model insists on the oneness of body, mind, and spirit and defines the body as an energy field in constant interaction with other energy fields. Based on many years of research into contemporary childbirth, most especially through interviews with physicians, midwives, nurses, and mothers, this article seeks to describe the 12 tenets of each paradigm as they apply to contemporary obstetrical and health care, and to point out their futuristic implications. I suggest that practitioners who combine elements of all three paradigms have a unique opportunity to create the most effective obstetrical system ever known.
© 2001 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Keywords:  Childbirth; Holism; Humanism; Obstetrics; Technomedicine

Year:  2001        PMID: 29645265     DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00510-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  11 in total

1.  Messages to new mothers: an analysis of breast pump advertisements.

Authors:  Athena Sheehan; Wendy L Bowcher
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The Birth Education Starts Today Video on Birth Care Options: Evaluation With University Students.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soliday; Gina Ord
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2020-01-01

Review 3.  Humanization of Care: Key Elements Identified by Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Providers. A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Isolde M Busch; Francesca Moretti; Giulia Travaini; Albert W Wu; Michela Rimondini
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  The Moral Dangers of Technocratic Medicine.

Authors:  John M Travaline
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2019-07-04

5.  Obstetric gaslighting and the denial of mothers' realities.

Authors:  Priya Fielding-Singh; Amelia Dmowska
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  The influence of experiential knowledge and societal perceptions on decision-making regarding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT).

Authors:  Sophie Montgomery; Zaneta M Thayer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.

Authors:  Mercedes Colomar; Newton Opiyo; Carol Kingdon; Qian Long; Soledad Nion; Meghan A Bohren; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Editorial: The Global Impacts of COVID-19 on Maternity Care Practices and Childbearing Experiences.

Authors:  Robbie Davis-Floyd; Kim Gutschow
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-07-05

9.  Indigenous Midwives and the Biomedical System among the Karamojong of Uganda: Introducing the Partnership Paradigm.

Authors:  Sally Graham; Robbie Davis-Floyd
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in Georgia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elina Miteniece; Milena Pavlova; Lela Shengelia; Bernd Rechel; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.