| Literature DB >> 29644810 |
Kyeong O Go1, Kwangho Lee1, Won Heo2, Young Seok Lee1, Young Seop Park2, Sung Kwon Kim2, Jeong Hee Lee3, Jin Myung Jung1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumors with cysts often correlate with gliomas, metastatic tumors, or hemangioblastomas, which require differentiation.Entities:
Keywords: Cyst; Histopathology; Intracranial meningioma; Neuropathology; Radiology
Year: 2018 PMID: 29644810 PMCID: PMC5932295 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Tumor Res Treat ISSN: 2288-2405
Cystic meningioma classification suggested by Nauta et al. [2]
| Radiologic findings | |
|---|---|
| Type I | Intratumoral cysts in which the tumor, macroscopically visible on all sides of the cyst, surrounds the cavity. |
| Type II | Intratumoral cysts, lying at the periphery of the tumor and surrounded by a row of neoplastic cells, detectable microscopically. |
| Type III | Peritumoral cysts, whose walls consisted partly of adjacent parenchyma and partly of the tumor. |
| Type IV | Peritumoral cysts, whose walls are formed by the arachnoid, separated from the tumor by a distinct capsule. |
Fig. 1Nauta type I cyst. Cystic lesion is located at center of tumor. A: MRI with contrast enhancement T1-weighted image of cysts with low signal intensity are observed in the center of the tumor with contrast enhancement. B: T2-weighted image shows high signal intensity, indicating a cystic lesion.
Fig. 2Nauta type II cyst. The cyst is located within the tumor but it is located at the periphery and the rim of the cystic lesion shows contrast enhancement (A and C). In T2-weighted image, the cystic portion appears as high signal intensity (B).
Fig. 3Nauta type III cyst which does not show any enhancement on the contrast medium (A), is adjacent to the surrounding brain. The mass is part of the cyst wall. The cystic lesion has the isosignal intensity as the cerebrospinal fluid in the ventricle (B).
Fig. 4Nauta type IV cyst which is peritumoral type. A: Tumor located in temporal convexity show enhancement on T1-weighted image with contrast and adjacent cysts are observed. B: The cystic portion shows high signal intensity at T2-weighted image.
Characteristics of the meningiomas
| Characteristics | Non-cystic | Cystic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56±12.6 | 55.2±9.4 | 0.703* |
| Sex, n (%) | |||
| Male | 18 (22.0) | 14 (36.8) | |
| Female | 64 (78.0) | 24 (63.2) | 0.120* |
| Location, n (%) | |||
| Convexity | 25 (30.5) | 15 (39.5) | |
| Parasagittal | 16 (19.5) | 3 (7.9) | |
| Falcine | 13 (15.9) | 5 (13.2) | |
| Sphenoid wing and clinoidal | 5 (6.1) | 5 (13.2) | |
| Posterior fossa | 7 (8.5) | 3 (7.9) | |
| Olfactory groove | 3 (3.7) | 6 (15.8) | |
| Tuberculum sellae | 9 (11.0) | 0 (0) | |
| Tentorial | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.2) | |
| Cavernous sinus | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Foramen magnum | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Intraventricular | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 0.064† |
| Histopathologic type | |||
| WHO grade I, n (%) | |||
| Meningothelial | 27 (32.9) | 14 (36.8) | Histopathological type |
| Transitional | 24 (29.3) | 6 (15.8) | |
| Fibrous | 18 (22) | 10 (26.3) | |
| Psammomatous | 3 (3.7) | 0 (0) | |
| Angiomatous | 2 (2.4) | 0 (0) | WHO grade |
| Metaplastic | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | |
| Microcystic | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | |
| WHO grade II, n (%) | |||
| Atypical | 5 (6.1) | 8 (21.1) | |
| WHO grade III, n (%) | |||
| Anaplastic 1 | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) |
*T-test, †Fisher's exact test, ‡Statistically significant. WHO, World Health Organization
Previous cystic meningioma cohorts that is available for Nauta subtype
| Authors | Year | Nauta type | Total | % in intracranial meningioma | Remark | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | III | IV | V | Mixed | Undetermined | |||||
| Kolluri et al. [ | 1987 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6.3 | ||||
| Fortuna et al. [ | 1988 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 1.7 | ||||
| Wasenko et al. [ | 1994 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | |||
| Sridhar et al. [ | 1995 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 17 | 7.3 | I+IV, I+II | ||
| Zee et al. [ | 1995 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 15 | 11.7 | ||||
| Ferrante et al. [ | 1997 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 | - | ||||
| Chen et al. [ | 2004 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 15 | - | Type V: Worthington's classification | ||
| Jung et al. [ | 2005 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 (I+III) | 21 | 5.5 | |||
| Souei Mhiri et al. [ | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 (II+III) | 4 | - | |||
| Liu et al. [ | 2007 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 3.8 | ||||
| Boukobza et al. [ | 2016 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 43 | 3.5 | ||
| Current study | 2017 | 15 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 38 | 9.6 | ||||
| Total (%) | 78 (36) | 56 (26) | 33 (15) | 29 (13) | 5 (2) | 15 (7) | 3 (1) | 219 (100) | |||
| Intratumoral | Peritumoral | ||||||||||
| Pinna et al. [ | 1986 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 3 cases: no preoperative CT scan | |||||
| Parisi et al. [ | 1986 | 4 | 3 | 7 | |||||||
| Borovich et al. [ | 1988 | 0 | 4 | 4 | |||||||
| Kwan et al. [ | 1992 | 3 | 6 | 9 | |||||||
| Carvalho et al. [ | 1997 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||||
| Weber et al. [ | 2003 | 1 | 6 | 7 | |||||||
| Zhang et al. [ | 2009 | 14 | 18 | 32 | |||||||
| Ghani et al. [ | 2015 | 5 | 8 | 13 | |||||||
| 30 | 45 | 93 | |||||||||
| Cushing et al. [ | 1938 | N/A | 13 | ||||||||
| Henry et al. [ | 1974 | N/A | 3 | ||||||||
| Dell et al. [ | 1982 | N/A | 8 | ||||||||
| el-Fiki et al. [ | 1996 | N/A | 9 | ||||||||
| el A. Skali et al. [ | 1998 | N/A | 6 | ||||||||
| Mena et al. [ | 1998 | N/A | 8 | ||||||||
| Demir et al. [ | 2007 | N/A | 5 | ||||||||
| Wan et al. [ | 2010 | N/A | 8 | ||||||||
| 60 | |||||||||||
| Total | 372 | ||||||||||
The summary of three cases of recurrent cystic meningiomas
| Case | Sex/Age | Recurr | Location | Cyst type | Cyst removal | Histopathological type | Simpson grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M/60 | Primary | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 1st | Convexity | 4 | No | Atypical | 4 | ||
| 2nd | 4 | No | Anaplastic | 4 | |||
| 2 | M/68 | Primary | Convexity | 4 | No | Atypical | 3 |
| 1st | 4 | No | Anaplastic | 2 | |||
| 3 | M/66 | Primary | Convexity | 1 | Yes | Fibrous | 2 |
| 1st | 1 | Yes | Fibrous | 2 | |||
| 2nd | - | Yes | Atypical | 2 |