| Literature DB >> 29644028 |
Vineet Kumar Singh1, Chandan Barman1, Divya Mohanty1, Rajesh Tandon1.
Abstract
Reproductive success of a plant species can be affected by the distribution pattern of its conspecifics in a small population. Besides the low mate availability, the dynamics of breeding system and pollination mechanism may also contribute to low fruit-set in such populations. We examined the relative contribution of these reproductive attributes on fruit-set across the contrasting distribution pattern (denser vs. sparser plots) in two isolated natural populations of a near-threatened tree species, Anogeissus sericea var. nummularia. Although flowers in the species are of generalist type, the narrow stigmatic surface appears to impose a requirement for a specialist pollinator. Pollination in the tree species is mediated only by the flies. The trees exhibit partial selfing and suffer from strong inbreeding depression at the early life-history stages of the selfed progeny. We recorded significant difference between the denser and sparser plots in terms of inflorescence visits per tree, and the number of trees covered in a bout by the pollinators. Moreover, tree density showed a strong positive correlation with fruit-set. Besides the requirement of having proximity among the conspecifics to facilitate pollinator movement, pollen quality also seemed to be a crucial attribute in the reproductive success of the tree species. It is inferred that the mating pattern and fecundity of plants in small and isolated populations are significantly influenced by the extent of sexual incompatibility and magnitude of their dependence on pollinators.Entities:
Keywords: Inbreeding depression; myophily; partial self-compatibility; reproductive biology
Year: 2018 PMID: 29644028 PMCID: PMC5888375 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/ply019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Figure 1.Floral features and pollinators of A. sericea var. nummularia. (A) An inflorescence at protogynous stage of flowers. Note that all the flowers are at the same stage in the inflorescence (arrow). (B) Scanning electron micrograph of a pollinated stigma. The pollen grains (pg) are deposited in the shallow cavity of the stigma (bar = 15 µm). Inset: transverse section across the base of stigmatic zone depicting the continuity with the stylar canal (sc). (C, D) Chrysomya megacephalla and Musca sp. foraging the flowers.
Outcome of the experimental pollinations during two seasons at the sites.
| Pollination treatment | 2012 | 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of treated inflorescence (flowers) | Fruit-set (%) | No. of treated inflorescence (flowers) | Fruit-set (%) | |
| ASNA | ||||
| Spontaneous autogamy | 50 (1824) | 18.47 | 50 (1856) | 20.2 |
| Autogamy | 50 (520) | 35.58 | 50 (531) | 29.38 |
| Xenogamy | 50 (490) | 77.14 | 50 (464) | 83.80 |
| Apomixis | 25 (85) | – | 25 (124) | – |
| Open-pollination | 50 (1805) | 29.98 | 50 (1875) | 27.89 |
| ASNJ | ||||
| Spontaneous autogamy | 30 (1165) | 19.91 | 50 (1911) | 18.27 |
| Autogamy | 30 (312) | 36.22 | 50 (525) | 32.11 |
| Xenogamy | 30 (300) | 84 | 50 (500) | 80.20 |
| Apomixis | 25 (100) | – | 25 (100) | – |
| Open-pollination | 30 (1141) | 30.59 | 50 (1938) | 28.99 |
Inbreeding depression (δ) manifested at different phases of plant development.
| S. no | Development phase | δ ASNA | δ ASNJ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Fruit-set | 0.59 | 0.61 | 1051 (autogamy), 954 (xenogamy) at ASNA; and 837 (autogamy), 800 (xenogamy) at ASNJ |
| 2. | Seed-set | 0.61 | 0.63 | 1051 (autogamy), 954 (xenogamy) at ASNA; and 837 (autogamy), 800 (xenogamy) at ASNJ |
| 3. | Seed weight | 0.59 | 0.58 | 100 seeds each |
| 4. | Seed germination | 0.58 | 0.73 |
|
| 6. | Seedling survival | 0.65 | 0.75 |
|
Pollinators and their behaviour on the trees of A. sericea var. nummularia at the two sites.
| Pollinator (site) | Inflorescence-handling time (min) | Foraging frequency ( | Pollen load |
|---|---|---|---|
| (ASNA) | |||
| | 5.3 ± 0.19 ( | 71.9 % | 412.68 ± 45.9 ( |
| | 2.7 ± 0.2 ( | 17.35 % | 290.78 ± 81.45 ( |
| | 3.1 ± 0.2 ( | 10.75 % | 278.7 ± 31.15 ( |
| (ASNJ) | |||
| | 4.15 ± 0.25 ( | 77.9 % | 364.18 ± 65.57 ( |
| | 2.15 ± 0.31 ( | 9.45 % | 187.89 ± 63.11 ( |
| | 2.12 ± 0.55 ( | 12.65 % | 258.1 ± 24.11 ( |
Test between subject effect of three-way ANOVA for the pollinator behavior in denser and sparser plots. Here the number of inflorescence (glomeruli) visited per tree and tree visited per bout are considered as dependent variables while two populations, two seasons and two plots (denser and sparser) are considered as fixed factors. P-value = 0.05 > * > 0.01; ** < 0.01.
| Dependent variable | Glomeruli visited per tree (df = 1,392) | Trees visited per bout (df = 1,192) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed factors |
|
|
|
|
| Population (ASNJ and ASNA) | 21.93 | 0.000** | 0.26 | 0.608 |
| Year (2012–13) | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.09 | 0.758 |
| Plot (denser and sparser) | 9.37 | 0.002* | 417.21 | 0.000** |
Figure 2.Effect of tree density on pollinator’s behaviour. Density significantly influenced the pollinator behaviour in terms of inflorescence (glomeruli) visited per tree and trees visited per bout by the pollinators. (A) and (B) show mean number of glomeruli visited by flies per tree; (C) and (D) represent mean number of trees visited per bout by the pollinators in sparser and denser plot in two seasons (2012 and 2013) and two populations (ASNA and ASNJ) (error bars signify standard deviation).
Figure 3.Effect of tree density on reproductive fitness. (A, B) Difference in mean percentage fruit-set in the denser and sparser plots in the two populations. In (C) and (D) the graphs represent correlation between the tree density (trees per 100 m2) and percentage fruit-set in the two populations.