Literature DB >> 29643645

"Look alike" packaging: Do we need a wake-up call?

Nandini M Dave1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29643645      PMCID: PMC5885436          DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.173353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0970-9185


× No keyword cloud information.
This is to report the striking similarity of 20% w/v mannitol injection and 25% w/v dextrose injection 100 ml pints that were supplied to the tertiary care University teaching hospital. We follow a zero prescription policy, whereby drugs and intravenous fluids, besides other consumables needed for procedures and treatment are available on schedule. As per the government procurement policy, a company whose product matches the specifications and is lowest on the price list is awarded the rate contract for the supply. While this process is established to ensure fair play, it sometimes results in suboptimal quality of supplied goods. In this case, both fluids were manufactured by the same company. An earlier batch had some difference in the color shade [Figure 1]. The subsequent batches looked exactly similar [Figure 2]. Although no untoward incident occurred, this was brought to the notice of the purchase department and the manufacturing unit.
Figure 1

Look alike labeling: 25% dextrose and 20% mannitol, slight difference in color

Figure 2

Look alike labeling: 25% dextrose and 20% mannitol, similar color and shade

Look alike labeling: 25% dextrose and 20% mannitol, slight difference in color Look alike labeling: 25% dextrose and 20% mannitol, similar color and shade Much has been written in the literature about the perils of look alike, sound alike drugs.[12] Equally important is the packaging and labeling of drugs. Mangar et al. write that reporting every look-alike is no longer novel; similarities between labels are a fact of life.3 I however, beg to differ. I think it is imperative we continue to report such potentially dangerous practices. This will ensure that pharmaceutical companies are forced to revisit their processes. To guarantee that our patients’ safety is not jeopardized, meticulous packaging specifications need to be put in place.[4] In addition, the regulatory authorities should periodically scrutinize the quality and packaging of medications and ensure that the stringent guidelines are being adhered to. Policy makers should be sensitized to the issue that it should be a quality product, and not necessarily the cheapest product that should reach the patient. As end users, we should be ever vigilant and continue to report such incidents that have potential to cause harm. Ensuring patient safety should be a consistent and continuous process, with no room for compromises or complacency.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  3 in total

1.  Reporting every look-alike is no longer novel: similarities between labels are a fact of life.

Authors:  D Mangar; R Miguel; J R Villarreal
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  Look-alike, sound-alike drugs review: include look-alike packaging as an additional safety check.

Authors:  Linda K McCoy
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2005-01

3.  Look alike drug labels : A worrying issue.

Authors:  Vikramjeet Arora; Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa; Jasbir Kaur
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.