Yun-Yi Park1, Yu-Jin Choi2. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, Dongnam Health College, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Jungwon University: 85 Munmu-ro, Goesan-eup, Goesan-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do 28024, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to present the effects of Interactive metronome (IM) on timing for children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of the present study were 2 children diagnosed with ADHD. Pre- and post-intervention tests were completed by the researcher using Long Form Assessment (LFA) test of IM and K-WPPSI-IV. The subjects were provided with IM for 40 minutes at a time, 2 times per week, for a total of 8 weeks. [Results] The timing decreased after IM intervention. The subjects showed improvement in attention span after IM intervention. Working memory index as well as processing speed index were increased after intervention, as shown by the Korean-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-IV (K-WPPSI-IV). [Conclusion] IM was effective in improving timing, attention, working memory and processing speed in children with ADHD.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to present the effects of Interactive metronome (IM) on timing for children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). [Subjects and Methods] The subjects of the present study were 2 children diagnosed with ADHD. Pre- and post-intervention tests were completed by the researcher using Long Form Assessment (LFA) test of IM and K-WPPSI-IV. The subjects were provided with IM for 40 minutes at a time, 2 times per week, for a total of 8 weeks. [Results] The timing decreased after IM intervention. The subjects showed improvement in attention span after IM intervention. Working memory index as well as processing speed index were increased after intervention, as shown by the Korean-Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-IV (K-WPPSI-IV). [Conclusion] IM was effective in improving timing, attention, working memory and processing speed in children with ADHD.
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a disorder characterized by inattention
and hyperactivity-impulsivity. In addition to the key symptoms, the disorder also presents
problems related to attention and executive function. Children with ADHD tend to exhibit
clinical deficits in working memory and processing speed1, 2). Of the ADHD subtypes,
predominantly the inattentive type is associated with short attention span and inability to
remain focused on task3), which lead to a
number of secondary problems such as low academic achievement, difficulty with interpersonal
relationships, negative emotional development, low self-esteem, etc4). Attention is dependent on executive function and timing,
which are reported to be associated with the function of the frontal lobe5). It is known that interventions designed to
improve the brain’s data-processing ability, through accurate timing and repetitive rhythm
training can play a key role in reducing inattention, and that the single most effective
measure of attention is timing3).Interactive metronome (IM), a tool founded on neuro-sensory and neuro-motor principles, can
improve motor function and cognitive function simultaneously6). In IM training, the individual synchronizes a range of hand and
foot exercises to a precise computer-generated reference tone heard through headphones.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based studies have provided sufficient evidence to suggest
that such a training activates all regions of the brain and increases the processing speed
of neural networks6).Bartscherer & Dole7) conducted a study
in which they examined the effects of a 7-week IM training on 9-year-old boys with attention
and motor coordination deficits. The study found that the training program had a positive
effect across a range of measures, including timing accuracy, balance, response speed,
visual motor coordination, upper limb speed, and agility. In a study by Namgung and
colleagues8), two children diagnosed with
ADHD were inducted into a 4-week IM program. Upon completion of the program, the children
were reported to have improved timing, attention, bilateral coordination, and upper limb
coordination. Shaffer and colleagues9) also
studied the effect of IM training on children with ADHD. The researchers found that the
training was effective for improving the children’s attention, motor control, language
processing, reading ability, as well as the ability to control aggressive impulses. However,
the effect of IM training on the cognitive variables of children with ADHD has not been
studied extensively. The purpose of the present study is to identify the effect of IM
training on timing, attention, and cognitive function (working memory, processing speed) in
ADHDchildren.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Two children diagnosed with ADHD were included as the subjects for the current study. The
researcher briefed the children and parents/legal guardians about the purpose of the study
and potential risk factors. All participants provided written consent, in accordance with
the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Child 1 was a 4.5-year-old boy
attending daycare, who had a K-WPPSI-IV composite score of 85. As for the child’s behavioral
characteristics, he had difficulties focusing on conversations, and he tended to say
inappropriate things that did not fit the context of the situations at hand. Child 2 was a
6-year-and-3-month-old boy attending kindergarten, who had a K-WPPSI-IV composite score of
100. The child exhibited behavioral characteristics of inattention, and difficulties
participating in kindergarten class activities.The study employed a “before and after” design in order to test the effect of IM training
on the subjects’ attention, executive function, working memory, and processing speed. Timing
and attention were measured using IM training’s Long Form Assessment (LFA) results. For
measurement of working memory and processing speed, K-WIPPSI-IV was used. A total of two
measurements were performed for each variable, one before and one after the intervention.
For the process of intervention, the standard 15-session IM protocol was selected, which
consisted of a 40-minute session taking place twice a week. The intervention was provided by
the first author, in child private center. During each session, the subjects put on a
headphone which delivered a computer-generated reference tone. A trigger detected any
contact or motion generated by the subject while performing the tasks, and transmitted the
data to a computer system. Therefore, the subject is expected to synchronize a range of hand
and foot exercises to a precise computer-generated reference tone heard through headphones.
With every movement, the subject is immediately provided with an audio feedback, indicating
how well a participant is performing. In the present study, the IM pro 9.0 software
(manufactured by Interactive Metronome) was used, which offered a total of 13 tasks in each
session. Timing and attention were measured with LFA-IM. As a measurement of timing, the
parameter “task average” was used, and the accuracy of each tap on the trigger was measured
in milliseconds (ms) and the millisecond average was recorded. A decreasing millisecond
average was interpreted as improvement in timing. As a measurement of attention, Super Right
On (SRO%) was used, which refers to the percentage of hits within 15 ms. The subjects were
provided with audiovisual feedback as an indicator of the quality of their performance. An
increasing SRO% was interpreted as improving attention. K-WPPSI-IV is an intelligence test
which provides developmentally responsive subtest and composite scores that represent
intellectual functioning of a child. In the present study, working memory index and
processing speed index obtained from the K-WPPSI-IV test were used as measurements of
working memory and processing speed.
RESULTS
Table 1 displays the millisecond averages before and after the intervention, which
suggest changes in timing. In Table 2, SRO% measurements before and after the intervention are displayed, which
suggest changes in attention. Table 3 displays the working memory index and processing speed index obtained from the
K-WIPPSI-IV test, before and after the intervention.
Table 1.
Pre-test and post-test millisecond averages
Case
Pre-test
Post-test
1
244 m/s
134 m/s
2
238 m/s
97 m/s
Table 2.
Pre-test and post-test SRO%
Case
Pre-test
Post-test
1
3.5%
13.7%
2
4.0%
27.6%
Table 3.
Pre-test and post-test K-WPPSI-IV working memory index and processing speed
index
Case
Category
Working memory index
Processing speed index
Pre-test
Post-test
Pre-test
Post-test
1
Percentile rank
94
97
20
55
Descriptive category
Superior
Superior
Below average
Average
2
Percentile rank
68
96
34
83
Descriptive category
Average
Superior
Average
Above average
DISCUSSION
The present study aimed to test the effect of IM training on the timing, attention, working
memory, and processing speed of children diagnosed with ADHD. Attention and timing were
measured with LFA-IM, while working memory and processing speed were measured with
K-WIPPSI-IV. Child 1 showed improvement in attention, timing, and processing speed, but no
significant change was observed in terms of working memory. As for Child 2, improvement was
observed across all measures, including attention, timing, working memory, and processing
speed.A number of previous studies have already reported the effect of IM training on the timing,
attention, and balance of children with ADHD. A study by Jung & Kim, which examined the
effect of IM training on bilateral coordination, balance, and upper limb function in paretic
children, reported improvement in bilateral coordination and balance10). A case study by Namgung and colleagues also reported
improved visual attention division and sustained attention in children with ADHD, following
an IM intervention8). The results obtained
in the current study regarding increased attention span and improved motor skills (such as
timing) following an IM intervention support the findings of previous studies. To inquire
whether the improvements observed in the study had a real effect in the children’s everyday
life, parents/legal caregivers were consulted. It turned out that the children indeed
exhibited less distractedness following the intervention. Reports from teachers also
verified that the children’s attention span and participation in class had improved
following the intervention.The other finding of the present study pertains to improvement in cognitive functions
following the IM intervention, as measured by working memory and processing speed. The
finding is substantiated by a previous study which reported that IM interventions had a
positive effect on the overall brain function, contributing to improved neural network
processing6). A study by Jessica &
Donald reported the effect of IM training on language skills training in teenagers with
language learning deficits11), while Bak
& Yoo reported of its efficacy in improving short-term memory12). As for studies concerning IM training’s effect on the
cognitive function of individuals diagnosed with ADHD, one study reported reduced
impulsivity and improved attention following IM intervention13, 14). On the other hand, the
current study employed the working memory index and processing speed index obtained from
K-WIPPSI-IV based on the fact that they are reported to be the most salient measures for
screening children for ADHD3, 15), and the results indicated that the IM intervention
contributed to both improved working memory and processing speed. The contribution of the
present study lies in the evidence it provides in support of the effectiveness of IM
training in improving the cognitive function of children diagnosed with ADHD.This study suggests that IM can be used as an intervention for improvement of physical and
cognitive function of children with developmental disabilities such as ADHD and may be
applied in the field of physical/occupational therapy. Generalizing the results of the
present study calls for caution, however, as the study is a case report involving only two
subjects. On this note, a follow-up study with a larger sample size would be beneficial, as
well as a comparative study examining the therapeutic effects of IM training and other
treatments for ADHD.