Literature DB >> 29643505

High male sexual investment as a driver of extinction in fossil ostracods.

Maria João Fernandes Martins1, T Markham Puckett2, Rowan Lockwood3, John P Swaddle4, Gene Hunt5.   

Abstract

Sexual selection favours traits that confer advantages in the competition for mates. In many cases, such traits are costly to produce and maintain, because the costs help to enforce the honesty of these signals and cues 1 . Some evolutionary models predict that sexual selection also produces costs at the population level, which could limit the ability of populations to adapt to changing conditions and thus increase the risk of extinction2-4. Other models, however, suggest that sexual selection should increase rates of adaptation and enhance the removal of deleterious mutations, thus protecting populations against extinction3, 5, 6. Resolving the conflict between these models is not only important for explaining the history of biodiversity, but also relevant to understanding the mechanisms of the current biodiversity crisis. Previous attempts to test the conflicting predictions produced by these models have been limited to extant species and have thus relied on indirect proxies for species extinction. Here we use the informative fossil record of cytheroid ostracods-small, bivalved crustaceans with sexually dimorphic carapaces-to test how sexual selection relates to actual species extinction. We show that species with more pronounced sexual dimorphism, indicating the highest levels of male investment in reproduction, had estimated extinction rates that were ten times higher than those of the species with the lowest investment. These results indicate that sexual selection can be a substantial risk factor for extinction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29643505     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0020-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  17 in total

1.  Biodiversity, functional redundancy and system stability: subtle connections.

Authors:  Robert E Ulanowicz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Sex differences in local adaptation: what can we learn from reciprocal transplant experiments?

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Debora Goedert; Miguel A Gómez-Llano; Foteini Spagopoulou; Angela Nava-Bolaños; Isobel Booksmythe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Experimental evidence for effects of sexual selection on condition-dependent mutation rates.

Authors:  Julian Baur; David Berger
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  A Cretaceous peak in family-level insect diversity estimated with mark-recapture methodology.

Authors:  Sandra R Schachat; Conrad C Labandeira; Matthew E Clapham; Jonathan L Payne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals.

Authors:  Julia D Monk; Erin Giglio; Ambika Kamath; Max R Lambert; Caitlin E McDonough
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Sebastian Chmielewski; Eylem Aydogdu; Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Stephane Rombauts; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Wiesław Babik; Mateusz Konczal; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.100

7.  How signalling games explain mimicry at many levels: from viral epidemiology to human sociology.

Authors:  William Casey; Steven E Massey; Bud Mishra
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  What do orange spots reveal about male (and female) guppies? A test using correlated responses to selection.

Authors:  Magdalena Herdegen-Radwan; Silvia Cattelan; Jakub Buda; Jarosław Raubic; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Meta-analytic evidence that sexual selection improves population fitness.

Authors:  Justin G Cally; Devi Stuart-Fox; Luke Holman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  How Signaling Games Explain Mimicry at Many Levels: From Viral Epidemiology to Human Sociology.

Authors:  William Casey; Steven E Massey; Bud Mishra
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2020-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.