Literature DB >> 29642099

Feasibility of Busulfan Melphalan and Stem Cell Rescue After 131I-MIBG and Topotecan Therapy for Refractory or Relapsed Metastatic Neuroblastoma: The French Experience.

Isabelle Ferry1, Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier1, Aurore Oudoux1, Olivier Cougnenc1, Gudrun Schleiermacher2, Jean Michon2, Emilie Bogart1, Pascal Chastagner3, Stéphanie Proust4, Dominique Valteau-Couanet5, Anne-Sophie Defachelles1.   

Abstract

High-risk neuroblastoma is characterized by poor long-term survival, especially for very high-risk (VHR) patients (poor response of metastases after induction therapy). The benefits of a tandem high-dose therapy and hematologic stem cell reinfusion (HSCR) have been shown in these patients. Further dose escalation will be limited by toxicity. It is thus important to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of new agents such as I-MIBG (131Iode metaiodobenzylguanidine) to be combined with high-dose therapy in the consolidation phase. We report the feasibility of busulfan/melphalan (BuMel) after I-MIBG therapy with HSCR in patients with refractory or relapsed metastatic neuroblastoma. From November 2008 to March 2015, 9 patients received BuMel after I-MIBG therapy and topotecan. The main toxicity was digestive with only 1 patient developing grade 4 sinusoidal obstructive syndrome. Seven patients are alive at a median follow-up of 25 months. Among them, 2 are in ongoing complete remission and 1 in ongoing stable disease. These results suggest that BuMel with HSCR can be administered safely 2 months after I-MIBG therapy associated with topotecan for VHR patients. This strategy will be compared with tandem high-dose chemotherapy (thiotepa and busulfan-melphalan), followed by HSCR in the upcoming SIOPEN VHR Neuroblastoma Protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29642099     DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1077-4114            Impact factor:   1.289


  4 in total

1.  Dosimetry-based high-activity therapy with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) and topotecan for the treatment of high-risk refractory neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jose Genolla; Trinidad Rodriguez; Pablo Minguez; Ricardo Lopez-Almaraz; Veronica Llorens; Aizpea Echebarria
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Upfront consolidation treatment with 131I-mIbG followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jianhua Feng; Frankie Wt Cheng; Alex Wk Leung; Vincent Lee; Eva Wm Yeung; Hoi Ching Lam; Jeanny Cheung; Grace Ks Lam; Terry Tw Chow; Carol Ls Yan; Chi Kong Li
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2020-09-27

3.  A safety and feasibility trial of 131 I-MIBG in newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: A Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Brian D Weiss; Gregory Yanik; Arlene Naranjo; Fan F Zhang; Wendy Fitzgerald; Barry L Shulkin; Marguerite T Parisi; Heidi Russell; Stephan Grupp; Luke Pater; Peter Mattei; Yael Mosse; Hollie A Lai; Jason A Jarzembowski; Hiroyuki Shimada; Judith G Villablanca; Roger Giller; Rochelle Bagatell; Julie R Park; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.838

4.  Factors Modifying Outcome After MIBG Therapy in Children With Neuroblastoma-A National Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Marek Ussowicz; Aleksandra Wieczorek; Agnieszka Dłużniewska; Anna Pieczonka; Robert Dębski; Katarzyna Drabko; Jolanta Goździk; Walentyna Balwierz; Daria Handkiewicz-Junak; Jacek Wachowiak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.