Syed Nabeel Zafar1, Adil A Shah1, Hira Channa2, Mustafa Raoof3, Lori Wilson1, Nabil Wasif4. 1. Department of Surgery, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC. 2. Department of Applied Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California. 4. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Abstract
Importance: Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. The magnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. Objectives: To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. Exposures: Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. Results: A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1% were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P < .05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2% higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3% higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.
Importance: Increasing regionalization of cancer surgery has the inadvertent potential to lead to fragmentation of care if readmissions occur at a facility other than the index hospital. The magnitude and adverse effects of readmission to a facility other than the one where the surgery was performed are unclear. Objectives: To assess rates of readmission to nonindex hospitals after major cancer surgery and to compare outcomes between index and nonindex hospital readmissions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter, population-based, nationally representative study of adult patients undergoing a major cancer operation (defined as esophagectomies or gastrectomies, hepaticobiliary resections, pancreatectomies, colorectal resections, or cystectomies), retrospective analyses were performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (admissions from January 1 through September 30, 2013). Descriptive analyses were performed to determine 90-day readmission characteristics, including timing, cost, and outcomes. Adjusting for clustering by facility, the study used multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with nonindex vs index readmissions. The study also used regression models to identify differences in mortality, major complications, and subsequent readmissions between the 2 groups. Data analysis was performed from January 1 through December 31, 2013. Exposures: Readmission to index vs nonindex hospitals (defined as any hospital other than the hospital where the major cancer operation was performed). Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of 90-day readmissions and nonindex readmissions after major cancer surgery, factors associated with nonindex readmissions, and difference between in-hospital mortality, hospital costs, and subsequent readmissions for patients admitted to index vs nonindex hospitals. Results: A total of 60 970 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 67 [13] years; 7619 [55.6%] male and 6075 [44.4%] female). The 90-day readmission rate was 23.0%. Of the 13 695 first readmissions, 20.1% were to a nonindex hospital. Independent factors associated with readmission to a nonindex hospital included type of procedure, comorbidities (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.70), elective admission (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.37), discharge to a nursing facility (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36), and surgery at a teaching hospital (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.00-1.34) (all P < .05). After risk adjustment, patients readmitted to nonindex hospitals had 31.2% higher odds of mortality (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64) and 27.3% higher odds of having a major complication (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42). Subsequent readmissions and hospital costs were not different between the 2 groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Approximately one-fifth of readmissions were to a nonindex hospital and were associated with higher mortality and morbidity than readmission to index hospitals. Factors that influence nonindex readmissions have been identified to target interventions.
Authors: Bellal Joseph; John M Morton; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Ilan Rubinfeld; Chadi Faraj; Vic Velanovich Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Chaoyi Zheng; Elizabeth B Habermann; Nawar M Shara; Russell C Langan; Young Hong; Lynt B Johnson; Waddah B Al-Refaie Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: S Machele Donat; Ahmad Shabsigh; Caroline Savage; Angel M Cronin; Bernard H Bochner; Guido Dalbagni; Harry W Herr; Matthew I Milowsky Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Karyn B Stitzenberg; Elin R Sigurdson; Brian L Egleston; Russell B Starkey; Neal J Meropol Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Irina Yermilov; David Bentrem; Evan Sekeris; Sushma Jain; Melinda A Maggard; Clifford Y Ko; James S Tomlinson Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Gabrielle B Rocque; Courtney P Williams; Harold D Miller; Andres Azuero; Stephanie B Wheeler; Maria Pisu; Olivia Hull; Rodney P Rocconi; Kelly M Kenzik Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Austin M Tang; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Li Ding; Casey A Jarvis; Edith Yuan; Ben Strickland; Steven L Giannotta; Arun Amar; Frank J Attenello; William J Mack Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Gretchen C Edwards; Sandra L Wong; Maria C Russell; Emily R Winslow; Virginia O Shaffer; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marta L McCrum; Austin R Cannon; Chelsea M Allen; Angela P Presson; Lyen C Huang; Benjamin S Brooke Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Timothy Wen; Nicole M Krenitsky; Mark A Clapp; Mary E D'Alton; Jason D Wright; Frank Attenello; William J Mack; Alexander M Friedman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-01-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Sameer A Hirji; Edward D Percy; Cheryl K Zogg; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Spencer Kiehm; Marc Pelletier; Tsuyoshi Kaneko Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Austin M Tang; Joshua Bakhsheshian; Michelle Lin; Casey A Jarvis; Edith Yuan; Ian A Buchanan; Li Ding; Ben A Strickland; Eric Chang; Gabriel Zada; William J Mack; Frank J Attenello Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2019
Authors: Daniel S Rubin; Megan Huisingh-Scheetz; Mark K Ferguson; Peter Nagele; Carol J Peden; Diane S Lauderdale Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Alexandra M J Langers; Jurjen J Boonstra; James C H Hardwick; Jolein van der Kraan; Arantza Farina Sarasqueta; Hans F A Vasen Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 2.375