Literature DB >> 29641625

The Conometric Concept: A 5-Year Follow-up of Fixed Partial Monolithic Zirconia Restorations Supported by Cone-in-Cone Abutments.

Marco Degidi, Diego Nardi, Sighinolfi Gianluca, Adriano Piattelli.   

Abstract

The use of the cone-in-cone connection to support definitive restorations was previously evaluated in cases involving full-acrylic resin or hybrid acrylic-resin composite prostheses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of definitive fixed partial prostheses made with monolithic zirconia and supported by cone-in-cone abutments and integrated implants. Implants were placed into healed sites and fresh extraction sockets. The prostheses were placed in the posterior regions of partially edentulous patients after healing periods of 3 months. A total of 76 patients received fixed monolithic zirconia restorations splinted with cone-in-cone connections to two implants that were followed up yearly for 5 years. At each follow-up visit, peri-implant bone levels and pocket depths were recorded. Esthetic, functional, and biologic United States Public Health Services parameters modified by the World Dental Federation study design were assessed at the last follow-up appointments. The opposing dentition was categorized by type of restoration and supporting structure at the time of placement of the definitive zirconia partial restoration and at the 5-year follow-up. The treatment achieved an 88.2% success rate and a 97.4% survival rate at the 5-year follow-up. None of the prostheses became loose or detached. One fixed prosthesis (0.76%) fractured 41 months after placement. No significant difference involving peri-implant bone and probing levels between the experimental times was found. The results of this research indicated that abutment-prosthesis cone-in-cone connections were successful within the 5-year study period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29641625     DOI: 10.11607/prd.3130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Peter Gehrke; Konstantin Bleuel; Carsten Fischer; Robert Sader
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 2.  Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Eleana Kontonasaki; Athanasios E Rigos; Charithea Ilia; Thomas Istantsos
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-02

3.  Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years.

Authors:  Markel Diéguez-Pereira; David Chávarri-Prado; Alejandro Estrada-Martínez; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Prosthetic Materials Used for Implant-Supported Restorations and Their Biochemical Oral Interactions: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Roxana Nicoleta Ionescu; Alexandra Ripszky Totan; Marina Meleșcanu Imre; Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu; Mihaela Pantea; Mihai Butucescu; Alexandru Titus Farcașiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Bacterial translocation and microgap formation at a novel conical indexed implant abutment system for single crowns.

Authors:  Peter Gehrke; Simon Burg; Ulrike Peters; Thomas Beikler; Carsten Fischer; Frank Rupp; Ernst Schweizer; Paul Weigl; Robert Sader; Ralf Smeets; Sogand Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Revolution of Current Dental Zirconia: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi; Omar Ghulam; Majid Krsoum; Suhail Binmahmoud; Hasan Taher; Wael Elmalky; Muhammad Sohail Zafar
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson; Irena Sailer; Andrey Latyshev; Kerstin Rabel; Ralf-Joachim Kohal; Duygu Karasan
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 5.021

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.