| Literature DB >> 29641502 |
Chuanhui Liao1,2, Dingtao Zhao3, Shuang Zhang4, Lanfang Chen5.
Abstract
Currently, villages "besieged with garbage" have become a serious problem in rural areas of China. Separation of rural residential solid waste (RRSW) is one of the main strategies for waste reduction. Although previous studies have analyzed the social and psychological motivations of residents' separation intention for municipal solid waste (MSW), little attention has been paid to the situation in rural areas. This paper investigates key factors influencing rural residents' separation intention, as well as analyzing the moderating effects of perceived policy effectiveness on the relationship between the determinants and the intention, using survey data of 538 rural residents in the province of Sichuan in China. The results show that all the proposed key factors influence the separation intention significantly. Furthermore, the policies were divided into two types and the moderating effects were tested for each type. The results show that the perceived effectiveness of both the inducement policy and the capacity building policy moderated the relationship between attitude and separation intention positively, while the perceived effectiveness of the inducement policy moderated the relationship between subjective norms and intention negatively. The findings provide insightful information for policymakers to design effective RRSW separation policies.Entities:
Keywords: capacity building policy; extended theory of planned behavior; inducement policy; rural household solid waste; waste separation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29641502 PMCID: PMC5923768 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040726
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Research Framework and Hypotheses.
The social-demographic of the respondents.
| Variable | Number of People | Percent (%) |
|---|---|---|
| <20 | 104 | 19.33 |
| 20–40 | 51 | 9.48 |
| 41–60 | 121 | 22.49 |
| >60 | 262 | 48.70 |
| Male | 251 | 46.65 |
| Female | 287 | 53.35 |
| Junior middle school or below | 287 | 53.35 |
| Senior high school or below | 213 | 39.59 |
| Junior college or bachelors’ degree or above | 38 | 7.06 |
| <1000 | 31 | 5.76 |
| 1001–1500 | 141 | 26.21 |
| 1501–2000 | 320 | 59.48 |
| >2000 | 46 | 8.55 |
Constructs and measurement items.
| Construct | Measurement Items | |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude (ATT) | ATT1 | RRSW separation is good |
| ATT2 | RRSW separation is useful | |
| ATT3 | RRSW separation is hygienic | |
| ATT4 | RRSW separation is beneficial | |
| Subjective norm (SN) | SN1 | Most people who are important to me think I should separate RRSW |
| SN2 | My neighbors expect me to separate RRSW | |
| SN3 | My family expect me to separate RRSW | |
| Perceived Behavioral Control (PBC) | PBC1 | I have plenty of opportunities to separate RRSW |
| PBC2 | I know how to separate my household waste | |
| PBC3 | I have enough time to separate my household waste | |
| Past behavior (PB) | PB1 | I have separated my RRSW in the past 4 weeks. |
| PB2 | I have been separating my RRSW in the past 4 weeks. | |
| PB3 | I have made waste separation behavior at home. | |
| Perceived Effect of Capacity | CBP1 | The separation facilities (bins, waste collection pools) provided by the government are sufficient to facilitate separation |
| Building Policy (CBP) | CBP2 | The government provides clear guidelines and examples on separation |
| CBP3 | The government’s promotion clearly explains the benefits of separation | |
| Perceived Effect of Inducement Policy (IP) | IP1 | I agree to pay for the waste charge. |
| IP2 | The monetary incentives can encourage me to separate RRSW | |
| IP3 | The public praise can encourage me to separate RRSW | |
| IP4 | I agree to punish those who do not separate RRSW | |
| Separation Intention (INT) | INT1 | I intend to separate my household waste in the near future |
| INT2 | I will separate my household waste every time I have it for disposal | |
| INT3 | I am willing to participate in the separation scheme in the near future | |
Results of confirmatory factor analysis.
| Construct | Items | Loadings | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sAttitude (ATT) | ATT1 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.76 |
| ATT2 | 0.88 | ||||
| ATT3 | 0.87 | ||||
| ATT4 | 0.86 | ||||
| liSubjective norm (SN) | SN1 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.74 |
| SN2 | 0.86 | ||||
| SN3 | 0.83 | ||||
| Perceived behavioral control (PBC) | PBC1 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.63 |
| PBC2 | 0.81 | ||||
| PBC3 | 0.83 | ||||
| Past behavior (PB) | PB1 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.75 |
| PB2 | 0.87 | ||||
| PB3 | 0.88 | ||||
| Perceived effectiveness of inducement policy (IP) | IP1 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 0.87 |
| IP2 | 0.92 | ||||
| IP3 | 0.93 | ||||
| IP4 | 0.93 | ||||
| Perceived effectiveness of capacity building policy (CBP) | CBP1 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.88 | 0.71 |
| CBP2 | 0.87 | ||||
| CBP3 | 0.83 | ||||
| Intention (INT) | INT1 | 0.92 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.80 |
| INT2 | 0.93 | ||||
| INT3 | 0.84 |
AVE average variance extracted.
Means, standard deviation, and correlations.
| Construct | Means | S.D. | ATT | IP | CBP | PB | INT | PBC | SN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATT | 4.52 | 1.21 | |||||||
| IP | 4.47 | 1.25 | 0.59 ** | ||||||
| CBP | 4.88 | 1.30 | 0.47 | 0.59 ** | |||||
| PB | 4.64 | 1.21 | 0.67 ** | 0.49 | 0.45 | ||||
| INT | 5.16 | 1.30 | 0.71 ** | 0.75 ** | 0.64 ** | 0.64 ** | |||
| PBC | 5.40 | 1.25 | 0.46 ** | 0.53 ** | 0.60 ** | 0.47 | 0.59 | ||
| SN | 4.78 | 1.19 | 0.65 ** | 0.69 ** | 0.60 ** | 0.58 ** | 0.74 ** | 0.56 ** |
The diagonal (bold) elements are the square roots of AVEs and the off-diagonal elements are the correlations among constructs. ** Shows significance at the 0.01 level. S.D. refers standard division.
Testing of the main and moderating effects of RRSW separation intention.
| Path | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | T-Value | Hypothesis & Result | Coefficients | T-Value | Hypothesis & Result | Coefficients | T-Value | Hypothesis & Result | |
| ATT → INT | 0.37 *** | 9.32 | H1: Supported | 0.22 *** | 5.24 | −0.57 ** | 2.71 | ||
| SN → INT | 0.39 *** | 10.18 | H2: Supported | 0.18 *** | 4.12 | 0.45 ** | 2.85 | ||
| PBC → INT | 0.21 * | 6.03 | H3: Supported | 0.14 * | 2.49 | 0.17 * | 2.11 | ||
| PB → INT | 0.14 *** | 3.31 | H4: Supported | 0.16 | 1.18 | ||||
| IP → INT | 0.31 *** | 6.71 | H5: Supported | 0.13 | 1.04 | ||||
| CBP → INT | 0.14 *** | 4.23 | H6: Supported | −0.40 *** | 3.4 | ||||
| ATT × CBP → INT | 0.33 * | 2.28 | H7a: Supported | ||||||
| SN × CBP → INT | −0.02 | 0.37 | H7b: NS | ||||||
| PBC × CBP → INT | 0.02 | 0.03 | H7c: NS | ||||||
| PB × CBP → INT | 0.01 | 0.23 | H7d: NS | ||||||
| ATT × IP → INT | 0.87 *** | 3.87 | H8a: Supported | ||||||
| SN × IP → INT | −0.51 * | 2.33 | H8b: Supported | ||||||
| PBC × IP → INT | −0.21 | 1.43 | H8c: NS | ||||||
| PE × PI → INT | −0.03 | 0.32 | H8d: NS | ||||||
| R2 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.77 | ||||||
| f2 | 0.68 | ||||||||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. NS refers to not supported.