| Literature DB >> 29641500 |
Xiangyu Ge1, Zhimin Zhou2, Yanli Zhou3, Xinyue Ye4, Songlin Liu5.
Abstract
Abstract: Is nitrogen oxides emissions spatially correlated in a Chinese context? What is the relationship between nitrogen oxides emission levels and fast-growing economy/urbanization? More importantly, what environmental preservation and economic developing policies should China's central and local governments take to mitigate the overall nitrogen oxides emissions and prevent severe air pollution at the provincial level in specific locations and their neighboring areas? The present study aims to tackle these issues. This is the first research that simultaneously studies the nexus between nitrogen oxides emissions and economic development/urbanization, with the application of a spatial panel data technique. Our empirical findings suggest that spatial dependence of nitrogen oxides emissions distribution exists at the provincial level. Through the investigation of the existence of an environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) embedded within the Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology (STIRPAT) framework, we conclude something interesting: an inverse N-shaped EKC describes both the income-nitrogen oxides nexus and the urbanization-nitrogen oxides nexus. Some well-directed policy advice is provided to reduce nitrogen oxides in the future. Moreover, these results contribute to the literature on development and pollution.Entities:
Keywords: EKC; nitrogen oxides emissions; spatial effects; sustainable development; urbanization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29641500 PMCID: PMC5923767 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Definitions and descriptive statistics of the variables.
| Variable | Definition | Mean | Std.Dev | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| log NOX | Nitrogen oxides emissions (ton) | 13.292 | 0.703 | 11.294 | 14.404 |
| log GDP | Real GDP per capita (RMB) | 10.332 | 0.560 | 9.016 | 11.760 |
| log URB | Percentage of urban population in the total population (%) | 3.9793 | 0.221 | 3.521 | 4.495 |
| log POP | Total Population | 8.188 | 0.739 | 6.333 | 9.292 |
| log EI | Energy intensity (Energy use per unit GDP, kg of coal equivalent/10000 GDP) | 7.052 | 0.486 | 6.084 | 8.260 |
Note: The real GDP per capita was measured by the 2003 constant price; RMB refers to Renminbi, the official currency of the People’s Republic of China; log NOx, log POP, and log EI are the proxies of environmental impact, population size, and technical impacts in Equations (3)–(5); log GDP and log URB (urbanization) are the proxies of affluence in Equations (3)–(5).
NOx emissions’ Global Moran’s I statistics.
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moran’s I | 0.212 | 0.190 | 0.186 | 0.173 | 0.173 | 0.182 |
| Z-Score | 2.327 | 2.121 | 2.080 | 1.959 | 1.963 | 2.052 |
| 0.020 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.040 |
Note: For consistency with the regression analysis, the spatial weight matrix for the Moran’s I test was also row-normalized.
Figure 1China’s NOx emissions distribution in (a) 2010, (b) 2012, and (c) 2015, respectively (Units: tons).
Parameter estimates of the non-spatial panel model.
| Dependent Variable: logNOx | Per Capita GDP as the Index of Affluence | Urbanization as the Index of Affluence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M1 | M2 | M3 | |
| log A | −15.272 *** | 1.972 *** | 0.745 *** | −17.495 | 2.789 | 0.448 *** |
| (−3.041) | (5.108) | (6.453) | (−0.535) | (1.513) | (3.109) | |
| (log A)2 | 1.601 *** | −0.074 *** | 4.943 | −0.318 | ||
| (3.288) | (−3.322) | (0.584) | (−1.274) | |||
| (log A)3 | −0.054 *** | −0.454 | ||||
| (−3.443) | (−0.622) | |||||
| Log POP | 0.271 | −0.284 | −0.988 *** | −0.402 | −0.444 * | −0.434 * |
| (0.810) | (−0.940) | (−4.460) | (−1.556) | (−1.785) | (−1.741) | |
| Log EI | 0.393 *** | 0.444 *** | 0.503 *** | 0.471 *** | 0.480 *** | 0.481 *** |
| (7.291) | (8.309) | (9.706) | (8.157) | (8.579) | (8.598) | |
| LM test no spatial lag | 6.3766 ** | 7.1485 *** | 10.4617 *** | 15.8132 *** | 15.3210 *** | 16.8318 *** |
| robust LM test no spatial lag | 0.0136 | 0.2819 | 0.0079 | 2.2739 | 2.7814 * | 1.1501 |
| LM test no spatial error | 8.0278 *** | 7.7327 *** | 13.1395 *** | 13.5398 *** | 12.5722 *** | 15.9735 *** |
| robust LM test no spatial error | 1.6647 | 0.8661 | 2.6858 | 0.0005 | 0.0326 | 0.2917 |
| LR-test spatial fixed effects | 749.7847 *** | 740.0405 *** | 747.0445 *** | 713.5834 *** | 715.3909 *** | 732.1524 *** |
| LR-test time fixed effects | 186.7664 *** | 175.4269 *** | 179.2426 *** | 154.7254 *** | 155.5018 *** | 157.1568 *** |
| N | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Rbar-squared | 0.4877 | 0.4561 | 0.4253 | 0.3268 | 0.3291 | 0.3268 |
Note: Numbers in the parentheses are t-stat; * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01. M1, M2, and M3 refer to the models corresponding to Equations (3)–(5), respectively; log A: logarithm of affluence; log POP: logarithm of total population; log EI: logarithm of energy intensity; LM test: Lagrange Multiplier test; LR-test: likelihood ratio test
Parameter estimates of the spatial panel model (GDP as the indicator of affluence).
| Dependent Variable: logNOx | Fixed Effects Estimates | Random Effects Estimates | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M1 | M2 | M3 | |
| logGDP | −14.886 *** | 2.146 *** | 0.715 *** | −16.737 *** | 2.513 *** | 0.306 *** |
| (−2.796) | (4.083) | (5.002) | (−3.395) | (5.583) | (2.983) | |
| (logGDP)2 | 1.587 *** | −0.088 *** | 1.761 *** | −0.108 *** | ||
| (3.047) | (−3.151) | (3.678) | (−5.098) | |||
| (logGDP)3 | −0.055 *** | −0.060 *** | ||||
| (−3.225) | (−3.894) | |||||
| logPOP | 0.257 | −0.197 | −0.891 ** | 0.787 *** | 0.768 *** | 0.773 *** |
| (0.592) | (−0.466) | (−2.532) | (9.760) | (9.596) | (9.721) | |
| log EI | 0.272 *** | 0.345 *** | 0.455 *** | 0.320 *** | 0.355 *** | 0.461*** |
| (3.541) | (4.523) | (6.403) | (4.834) | (5.206) | (6.376) | |
| WlogGDP | 13.293 | 0.667 | −0.402 * | 2.723 | −0.199 | −0.045 |
| (1.064) | (0.784) | (−1.752) | (0.252) | (−0.276) | (−0.265) | |
| (WlogGDP)2 | −1.354 | −0.088 * | −0.320 | −0.006 | ||
| (−1.110) | (−1.734) | (-0.304) | (-0.161) | |||
| (WlogGDP)3 | 0.042 | 0.011 | ||||
| (1.069) | (0.321) | |||||
| WlogPOP | 0.441 | 0.644 | 0.211 | −0.320 * | −0.394 ** | −0.627 *** |
| (0.613) | (0.923) | (0.343) | (−1.945) | (−2.411) | (−3.978) | |
| Wlog EI | 0.144 | 0.074 | −0.080 | 0.079 | 0.021 | −0.149 |
| (1.006) | (0.501) | (−0.547) | (0.587) | (0.150) | (−1.003) | |
| W*log NOx | 0.376 *** | 0.350 *** | 0.426 *** | 0.313 *** | 0.318 *** | 0.425 *** |
| (4.536) | (4.120) | (5.291) | (3.731) | (3.810) | (5.614) | |
| teta | 0.043 *** | 0.045 *** | 0.051 *** | |||
| (5.481) | (5.481) | (5.482) | ||||
| Hausman | 26.9213 *** | 40.1047 *** | 75.0638 *** | |||
| N | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Rbar−squared | 0.5397 | 0.5163 | 0.4263 | 0.7208 | 0.7131 | 0.7429 |
| Wald_spatial_lag | 16.0228 *** | 13.3801 *** | 3.3914 | 15.3446 *** | 15.3468 *** | 17.7147 *** |
| LR_spatial_lag | 16.9816 *** | 15.3136 *** | 2.7463 | 13.1342 *** | 13.5632 *** | 15.6328 *** |
| Wald_spatial_error | 12.5273 ** | 11.9753 ** | 1.2424 | 8.5388 | 8.9657 * | 5.5823 |
| LR_spatial_error | 15.2257 *** | 14.8212 *** | 1.3204 | 12.8486 *** | 13.0801 *** | 9.6508 ** |
Note: Numbers in the parentheses are t-stat; * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01. M1, M2, and M3 refers to the models corresponding to Equations (3)–(5), respectively.
Parameter estimates of the spatial panel model (urbanization as the indicator of affluence).
| Dependent Variable: logNOx | Spatial Fixed Effects | Spatial Random Effects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | M2 | M3 | M1 | M2 | M3 | |
| logURB | −86.326 ** | 1.505 | 0.523 *** | −71.725 ** | 1.868 | 0.589 *** |
| (−2.269) | (0.799) | (2.687) | (−2.475) | (1.076) | (3.446) | |
| (logURB)2 | 22.580 ** | −0.154 | 18.711 ** | −0.172 | ||
| (2.278) | (−0.609) | (2.508) | (−0.751) | |||
| (logURB)3 | −1.958 ** | −1.610 ** | ||||
| (−2.276) | (−2.520) | |||||
| logPOP | −0.333 | −0.395 | 0.104 | 0.737 *** | 0.766 *** | 0.817 *** |
| (−1.022) | (−1.189) | (0.314) | (8.598) | (9.083) | (10.402) | |
| log EI | 0.215 *** | 0.277 *** | 0.374 *** | 0.311 *** | 0.379 *** | 0.425 *** |
| (2.792) | (3.705) | (4.978) | (4.222) | (5.132) | (5.939) | |
| WlogURB | 44.950 | 20.596 *** | −0.454 | 119.975 * | 5.661 | −0.319 |
| (0.530) | (4.604) | (−1.522) | (1.944) | (1.541) | (−1.166) | |
| (WlogURB)2 | −8.769 | −2.881 *** | −30.056 * | −0.813 * | ||
| (−0.396) | (−4.707) | (−1.891) | (−1.643) | |||
| (WlogURB)3 | 0.464 | 2.485 * | ||||
| (0.241) | (1.821) | |||||
| WlogPOP | −0.758 | −0.889 | −0.864 | −0.541 *** | −0.565 *** | −0.594 *** |
| (−1.351) | (−1.545) | (−1.461) | (−3.346) | (−3.504) | (−3.811) | |
| Wlog EI | 0.173 | 0.145 | 0.020 | −0.017 | −0.079 | −0.080 |
| (1.196) | (0.974) | (0.131) | (−0.120) | (−0.538) | (−0.541) | |
| W*log NOx | 0.343 *** | 0.328 *** | 0.469 *** | 0.444 *** | 0.410 *** | 0.430 *** |
| (4.068) | (3.827) | (6.094) | (5.975) | (5.318) | (5.695) | |
| teta | 0.044 *** | 0.047 *** | 0.050 *** | |||
| (5.481) | (5.481) | (5.482) | ||||
| N | 180.000 | 180.000 | 180.000 | 180.000 | 180.000 | 180.000 |
| Rbar-squared | 0.512 | 0.485 | 0.337 | 0.632 | 0.657 | 0.719 |
| Hausman | 26.426 *** | 32.269 *** | 22.014 *** | |||
| Wald_spatial_lag | 35.5964 *** | 26.9514 *** | 4.1150 | 27.9652 *** | 21.0943 *** | 18.6102 *** |
| LR_spatial_lag | 39.2325 *** | 30.8808 *** | 4.5914 | 24.5783 *** | 19.0932 *** | 16.1401 *** |
| Wald_spatial_error | 35.2548 *** | 28.3682 *** | 5.1504 | 13.3523 ** | 9.2156 * | 5.7002 |
| LR_spatial_error | 39.5535 *** | 32.8361 *** | 6.1206 | 16.9972 *** | 12.0617 ** | 8.6987 ** |
Note: Numbers in the parentheses are t-stat; * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01. M1, M2, and M3 refer to the models corresponding to Equations (3)–(5), respectively.
Direct and spillover effects estimation (gross domestic product as the indicator of affluence).
| M1 | M2 | M3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Spillover | Direct | Spillover | Direct | Spillover | |
| logGDP | −14.122 ** | 11.353 | 2.281 *** | 2.104 * | 0.697 *** | −0.155 |
| (−2.530) | (0.603) | (4.629) | (1.885) | (4.988) | (−0.493) | |
| (logGDP)2 | 1.512 *** | −1.117 | −0.100 *** | −0.174 ** | ||
| (2.772) | (−0.610) | (−3.636) | (−2.386) | |||
| (logGDP)3 | −0.052 *** | 0.032 | ||||
| (−2.965) | (0.540) | |||||
| logPOP | 0.296 | 0.856 | −0.123 | 0.822 | −0.901 *** | −0.272 |
| (0.702) | (0.858) | (−0.315) | (0.935) | (−2.865) | (−0.329) | |
| log EI | 0.297 *** | 0.375 * | 0.359 *** | 0.303 | 0.468 *** | 0.187 |
| (4.322) | (1.939) | (5.008) | (1.635) | (7.247) | (0.908) | |
Note: Numbers in the parentheses are t-stat; * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01; the direct and spillover effects of linear, square, and cubic terms of log GDP are practically meaningless; M1, M2, and M3 refer to the models corresponding to Equations (3)–(5), respectively.
Direct and spillover effects estimation (Urbanization as the indicator of affluence).
| M1 | M2 | M3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | Spillover | Direct | Spillover | Direct | Spillover | |
| logURBEN | −83.932 * | 22.233 | 3.404 * | 29.880 *** | 0.501 *** | −0.377 |
| (−1.904) | (0.164) | (1.775) | (4.319) | (2.749) | (−0.850) | |
| (logURBEN)2 | 22.240 * | −1.504 | −0.416 | −4.156 *** | ||
| (1.930) | (−0.042) | (−1.603) | (−4.353) | |||
| (logURBEN)3 | −1.956 * | −0.297 | ||||
| (−1.948) | (−0.096) | |||||
| logPOP | −0.415 | −1.268 | −0.464 | −1.477 * | −0.019 | −1.404 |
| (−1.364) | (−1.680) | (−1.490) | (−1.979) | (−0.062) | (−1.524) | |
| log EI | 0.240 *** | 0.355 * | 0.301 *** | 0.333 * | 0.403 *** | 0.349 |
| (3.223) | (1.919) | (4.207) | (1.744) | (5.930) | (1.478) | |
Note: Numbers in the parentheses are t-stat; * p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01; the direct and spillover effects of linear, square, and cubic terms of log URB are practically meaningless. M1, M2, and M3 refer to the models corresponding to Equations (3)–(5), respectively.
Figure 2The partial fit of the GDP–NOx, Urbanization–NOx emissions nexuses (logarithm transformed). Note: These two graphs aim to reveal the GDP–NOx and Urbanization–NOx relations, but not to predict NOx emissions levels. Thus, the values on Y-axis are omitted. The turning points (marked with red dots) in the GDP–NOx nexus are 7.8443 (2551 RMB) and 11.5403 (102,775 RMB), whereas in the Urbanization–NOx nexus they are 3.5428 (35%) and 4.0373 (57%).