Literature DB >> 29638228

Vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates compensatory lung growth by increasing the alveolar units.

Duy T Dao1, Prathima Nandivada1, Jacqueline T Vuong1, Lorenzo Anez-Bustillos1, Amy Pan1, Hiroko Kishikawa1, Paul D Mitchell2, Meredith A Baker1, Gillian L Fell1, Thomas Martin3, Mark Puder1.   

Abstract

BackgroundDeficiency of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is associated with hypoplastic lung diseases, such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Provision of VEGF has been demonstrated to be beneficial in hyperoxia-induced bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and hence could induce lung growth and improve the outcome in hypoplastic lung diseases. We aimed to determine the effects of exogenous VEGF in a rodent model of compensatory lung growth after left pneumonectomy.MethodsEight-to-ten-week-old C57Bl6 male mice underwent left pneumonectomy, followed by daily intra-peritoneal injections of saline or VEGF (0.5 mg/kg). Lung volume measurement, pulmonary function tests, and morphometric analyses were performed on post-operative day (POD) 4 and 10. The pulmonary expression of angiogenic factors was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot.ResultsLung volume on POD 4 was higher in the VEGF-treated mice (P=0.03). On morphometric analyses, VEGF increased the parenchymal volume (P=0.001), alveolar volume (P=0.0003), and alveolar number (P<0.0001) on POD 4. The VEGF group displayed higher levels of phosphorylated-VEGFR2/VEGFR2 (P=0.03) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) messenger RNA (P=0.01).ConclusionVEGF accelerated the compensatory lung growth in mice, by increasing the alveolar units. These changes may be mediated by VEGFR2 and EGF-dependent mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29638228      PMCID: PMC6019135          DOI: 10.1038/pr.2018.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


INTRODUCTION

Angiogenesis plays a central role in human tissue development and regeneration. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a key mediator of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, is necessary for the normal development of many tissues including the liver, brain, eyes, and lungs (1). VEGF, localized to the epithelial cell’s basement membrane in the fetal lung, is thought to play a critical role in guiding the development of the newly formed capillary network within the lung (2). The absence of VEGF results in decreased lung maturation, decreased surfactant production, and hypoplasia of blood vessels and alveoli (3). These tissue abnormalities and altered levels of tissue VEGF are observed in humans and animal models of pulmonary diseases of infancy including respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and pulmonary hypoplasia due to congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) (4–7). Our group previously demonstrated in mice that systemic administration of exogenous murine VEGF accelerated compensatory lung growth, resulting in a return to 100% of baseline lung volume in 4 days rather than 8–10 days after left pneumonectomy. The lungs in VEGF-treated animals were histologically indistinguishable from saline-treated animals with respect to vascular and alveolar density (8). However, the mechanism by which VEGF accelerates lung regeneration after unilateral pneumonectomy and its effects on pulmonary mechanics and morphometry remain unknown. The purpose of our current study was to determine the effects of systemic exogenous murine VEGF on pulmonary mechanics in a murine model of compensatory lung growth after left pneumonectomy. We also aimed to investigate potential cellular mechanisms by which these changes are mediated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental Groups and Surgical Procedure

All procedures were carried out according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Boston Children’s Hospital. Eight-to-ten week-old C57BL/6 male mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME) were randomized into control or VEGF experimental groups. Prior to left pneumonectomy, VEGF groups received 0.5 mg/kg of recombinant murine VEGF-164 (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ) via intraperitoneal (ip) injection. Control groups received an isovolumetric volume of normal saline via ip injection. Mice were then anesthetized with 120–400 mg/kg of Avertin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) via ip injection and orotracheally intubated as previously described (9,10). The animal was ventilated on room air with a rodent ventilator (HSE-HA Minivent, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) at 150 breaths/minute. Pneumonectomy then proceeded as previously described (11). Post-operative pain control was achieved with twice daily subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine for 72 hours. Postoperatively, VEGF and control groups were further divided into two treatment-duration groups, receiving daily ip injections of VEGF or saline for either 4 or 10 days postoperatively. These two time points were chosen to compare the effects of the two treatments during (day 4) and at the end (day 10) of the proliferative phase of compensatory lung growth.

Pulmonary Mechanical Studies

On postoperative day (POD) 4 or 10 and immediately before euthanasia, animals underwent pulmonary mechanical measurements with the Flexivent® system (SCIREQ, Montreal, Canada). Mice were anesthetized with Avertin as previously described, followed by a tracheotomy and insertion of a 20-gauge hollow bore needle, which was connected to the Flexivent® system. Elastance and compliance were measured with the single frequency forced oscillation technique, which registered the animal’s response to an applied sinusoidal waveform. The system also generated pressure-volume (PV) loops, which allowed for the calculation of the inspiratory capacity and the area under the PV loop, an estimate of collapsed alveolar units before the PV loop maneuver. To normalize these parameters for the animal’s size, inspiratory capacity, area under the PV loop, and compliance were divided by body weight.

Organ Harvest, Mass and Volume Measurement

Animals were euthanized upon disconnection from the Flexivent® system with carbon dioxide. Animals were weighed and the remaining right lung was removed en-bloc with the tracheobronchial tree. Specimens were divided into two groups: morphometric analysis group and RNA/protein analysis group. Specimens destined for morphometric analysis were inflated with 10% formalin at 25 cmH2O via the previously intubated 18-gauge needle. The trachea was ligated with a 4–0 silk suture to maintain alveolar distension and total lung volume was measured with the water displacement method (12). The specimen was placed in 10% formalin overnight at 4°C. The liver, spleen, and kidneys were also harvested and weighed before being preserved in 10% formalin overnight at 4°C. All specimens were transferred into 70% ethanol after 24 hours of formalin fixation and subsequently embedded in paraffin for histologic analyses. Lung volume and organ mass measurements were normalized for body weight. Lung specimens for RNA/protein analysis were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen for future tissue analysis without undergoing volume measurement.

Morphometric Analysis

Quantitative microscopy was performed on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained lung sections based on the principles of stereology. Five lung specimens from each group were randomly selected for morphometric analyses. One 5-micron section from each specimen was examined at 200× magnification using the principle of systemic uniform random sampling: the first lung field on each section was selected randomly, followed by systemic sampling of every other field to achieve a total of 40–50 lung fields per section. For each field, a 42-point test lattice with predefined grid line length was used to facilitate point and intersection counting(13,14). Parenchyma was defined as the gas-exchange compartment of the lung, which included alveoli, terminal ducts, and alveolar septa. All volume and area measurements were normalized for body weight. Under the assumptions that alveolar units assume a spherical shape and are randomly distributed throughout the lung parenchyma, alveolar density was mathematically calculated from counting the number of alveolar transections on randomly chosen lung fields using the method of Weibel and Gomez (15)

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from lung tissues with the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Amplification reactions were performed with the StepOne Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using pre-designed and validated TaqMan® primers for VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 1, VEGFR2, neuropilin (NRP) 1, VEGF-A, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and EGF receptor (EGFR) (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). All target genes were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH and their mRNA levels calculated using the 2ΔΔCt method (16).

Western Blot and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Lung tissue samples from animals euthanized on POD 4 were immediately suspended in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Boston Bio Products, Ashland, MA) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Tissue samples were then homogenized and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4°C and 14,000 rpm. The supernatants were collected and protein concentration was measured with the Bradford colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc, Hercules, CA). Forty micrograms of protein from each sample were mixed with 4× Laemmli buffer (Boston Bio Products, Ashland, MA), heated at 95°C for 5 minutes, and separated on a 4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and blocked in a TBST solution (50 mM Tris-HCl - pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc, Hercules, CA) for 1 hour. Incubation with primary antibodies at 1:1000 dilution in blocking buffer was done overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies included anti-VEGFR1, -MMP14 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), -VEGFR2, -P-1175-VEGFR2, -NRP1, -EGFR, -P-1068-EGFR (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), -HB-EGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and -β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). On the following day, the membrane was washed with TBST for 10 minutes ×3 before incubation in secondary antibodies, horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-rabbit, anti-mouse (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), or anti-rat IgG (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) antibodies at 1:2000 dilution for 1 hour at room temperature. The membrane was again washed with TBST, followed by signal visualization with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Lung tissue levels of EGF were determined with ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, lung tissue extract was added to the supplied ELISA plate and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. This was followed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugation and addition of chemiluminescent reagent. Chemiluminescent signal was detected at 450 nm and protein concentration was determined from a standard curve.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung sections were dried in an oven at 58 °C for 30 minutes prior to deparaffinization. All sections were deparaffinized using two washes of xylene and rehydrated using progressively lower concentrations of ethanol, ending in phosphate buffered solution (PBS). For Ki67 staining, antigen retrieval was performed by heating slides in a bath of citrate-based unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) to 120°C for 1 minute in a pressurized heater (Decloaking Chamber™, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA). After cooling, the slides were incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature with 1% Triton-X. For vascular endothelium (VE)-Cadherin staining, antigen retrieval was achieved with incubation in Tris/EDTA (pH = 9) for 5 minutes at 95°C. Subsequently, a 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol solution was applied for 12 minutes at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase. Nonspecific binding was blocked with TNB (Tris HCl, NaCl and Bovine Serum Albumin) for 30 minutes. Slides were incubated with rabbit anti-Ki67 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) in a 1:100 dilution in TNB for 3 hours at room temperature or goat anti-VE-Cadherin antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at 1:200 dilution overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS, samples were incubated with an anti-rabbit HRP labelled polymer solution (Dako North America, Carpinteria, CA) or rabbit anti-goat IgG antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 1 hour at room temperature. Signal visualization was achieved with diaminobenzidine (ImmPACT DAB, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin (Mayer’s hematoxylin, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Samples were dried overnight and mounted with xylene and Permount (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Ki67 index was defined as the ratio between the number of Ki67-positive cells (excluding non-alveolar macrophages) and the total number of cells. Fifteen non-overlapping random parenchymal lung fields examined at 400× magnification were used to calculate the average Ki67 index for each specimen.

Statistical Analysis

Outcomes, adjusted for body weight as described above, were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance containing a main effect for POD, a main effect for group, and the interaction effect POD × group. The interaction effect comprised six pairwise comparisons, two of which were considered a priori to be of interest (POD 4, control vs POD 4, VEGF; POD 10, control vs POD 10, VEGF). These comparisons were adjusted for multiplicity using a step-up Bonferroni adjustment (17). All outcomes were normally distributed except inspiratory capacity, parenchymal volume, alveolar volume, and mean septal thickness. For these, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by transforming each outcome using normal scores and comparing the results to the non-transformed outcomes (18). In all cases the results were consistent and presented in their original units. Additionally, an outlier for EGF on POD 4 was shown to greatly increase the fold difference for VEGF compared to control, so results are reported both with and without the outlier. Tests of significance were two-sided, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). All data analysis was conducted with SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC).

RESULTS

Lung Volume and Organ Mass Measurements

Mice in the VEGF group had a significantly higher lung volume to body weight ratio (LV/BW) on POD 4 compared to those in the control group (5.86 ± 0.18 × 10−2 mL/g vs 5.20 ± 0.18 × 10−2 mL/g, P = 0.03). On POD 10, there was no difference in LV/BW between the two groups. When normalized for body weight, there was no difference in liver, kidney, or spleen weights between the two experimental groups at either time point (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Organ Volume and Weight Measurements

Mice treated with VEGF demonstrate increased lung volume/body weight ratio on post-operative day (POD) 4 (A). There is no difference between the two groups in liver (B), kidney (C), or spleen weight (D). Data are shown as mean ± SE.

Normalized for body weight, there was no difference between the two treatment groups at either time point (POD 4 and 10) in inspiratory capacity or dynamic compliance (Figure 2A,C). Although not reaching statistical significance, VEGF-treated mice on POD 4 displayed higher area under the PV loop (P = 0.1) (Figure 2B), an indirect measurement of alveolar units that were available for recruitment before the PV loop maneuvers.
Figure 2

Pulmonary Function Studies

There is no difference between the two groups in normalized inspiratory capacity (A). Although not reaching statistical significance, area under the PV loop is higher in the VEGF group on POD 4 (B). There is no difference in pulmonary compliance (C). Data are shown as mean ± SE.

Morphometric Studies

Mice in the VEGF group displayed a significant increase in adjusted parenchymal volume (4.7 ± 0.2 × 10−2 mL/g vs 3.8 ± 0.2 × 10−2 mL/g, P = 0.001), alveolar volume (3.0 ± 0.1 × 10−2 mL/g vs 2.3 ± 0.1 × 10−2 mL/g, P = 0.0003), total alveolar count (4.7 ± 0.2 × 107 vs 2.8 ± 0.2 × 107, P < 0.0001), and septal surface area (19.0 ± 0.7 cm2/g vs 15.5 ± 0.7 cm2/g, P = 0.007) on POD 4 compared to the control group. On POD 10, all of these parameters equalized except for alveolar count, which remained higher in the VEGF group (3.9 ± 0.2 × 107 vs 3.1 ± 0.2 × 107, P = 0.006). Interestingly, compared to POD 4, mice treated with VEGF had a lower alveolar count on POD 10 (P = 0.006). Mice in the VEGF group had higher adjusted septal volume compared to those in the control group on both POD 4 (0.90 ± 0.05 × 10−2 mL/g vs 0.76 ± 0.05 × 10−2 mL/g, P = 0.06) and POD 10 (1.00 ± 0.05 × 10−2 mL/g vs 0.85 ± 0.05 × 10−2 mL/g, P = 0.06), but these differences did not meet the established statistical cutoff of P < 0.05. There was no difference in mean septal thickness between the two groups at POD 4, but a nonsignificant elevation in the VEGF group was observed on POD 10 (P = 0.10; Figure 3).
Figure 3

Morphometric Analyses

VEGF-treated mice display increased parenchymal volume (A), alveolar volume (B), and septal surface area (D) on POD 4. Alveolar count is higher in the VEGF group on both POD 4 and 10 (C), but there is a decrease in alveolar count in the VEGF group from POD 4 to 10. There is a trend toward significance for higher septal volume on POD 4 and 10 in the VEGF group (E). There is no statistical difference in mean septal thickness between the two groups although the value is higher on POD 10 with VEGF treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SE.

Gene and Protein Expression Analysis

There was no difference in the messenger-RNA (mRNA) level of VEGF, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, NRP1, or EGFR between the VEGF and control groups. However, VEGF-treated mice displayed a 20.5-fold increase in the level of EGF on POD 4 compared to the control group; even after omission of one outlier among the VEGF group, there remained a statistically significant 5-fold increase (P = 0.02) (Figure 4A). Efforts to determine the protein levels of EGF were unsuccessful as ELISA failed to detect its presence in lung tissue. There was no difference in protein expression levels of VEGFR1 or NRP1 between the two experimental groups. However, the activation level of VEGFR2 on POD 4 was significantly higher in the VEGF group compared to the control group (P = 0.03) (Figure 4B–C). Although not reaching statistical significance, the activation level of EGFR was also higher in the VEGF group (P = 0.09). There was no difference in the expression levels of MMP14 and HB-EGF between the two groups.
Figure 4

Gene and Protein Expression Analyses

VEGF-treated lungs on POD 4 display increased mRNA expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) on quantitative polymerase chain reactions (A). VEGF-treated lungs also display increased VEGFR2 activation on western blot (B&C). Although not reaching statistical significance, there is also an increase in EGFR activation (B–C). Data are shown as mean ± SE.

Immunohistochemistry

IHC labeling of lung sections for VE-Cadherin revealed uniform staining of alveolar septa in both groups (Figure 5A). The Ki67 index was significantly higher in the VEGF group on POD 2 as compared to the control group (0.18 ± 0.02 vs 0.11 ± 0.02, P = 0.02) (Figure 5B). However, this relationship reversed on POD 4 when more proliferation was seen in the control group (0.25 ± 0.02 vs 0.16 ± 0.03, P = 0.02) (Figure 5C). These findings suggested a shift toward earlier cellular proliferation as a result of systemic VEGF treatment.
Figure 5

Immunohistochemistry

VE-Cadherin-labeled lung sections reveal no difference in pulmonary vasculature between the two treatment groups (A). On Ki67 staining, cellular proliferation increased with VEGF treatment on POD 2 but reduced on POD 4 (B–D). Data for Ki67 index are shown as mean ± SE.

DISCUSSION

The need for therapies to accelerate lung development in infants with pulmonary disease continues to be a high priority. Exogenous VEGF administration and VEGF-gene therapy have been investigated in animal models of respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia with evidence of improved capillary and alveolar development, supporting the hypothesis that postnatal VEGF therapy may be a viable option (3,7). We previously demonstrated that administration of systemic exogenous murine VEGF accelerated compensatory lung growth in 8-week old mice after left pneumonectomy with preservation of normal pulmonary architecture (8). Our current study demonstrated that there were no differences in several measures of pulmonary mechanics between mice that received VEGF and those that received saline after left pneumonectomy, in spite of an increased total lung volume in the VEGF-treated group. Specifically, VEGF therapy did not alter dynamic compliance or resistance, suggesting that the tissue changes that occurred in the VEGF-treated group did not alter overall mechanics. It should also be noted that despite a small and statistically insignificant increase in mean septal thickness in the VEGF group on POD 10, which was likely a result of increased vascular permeability associated with prolonged systemic administration, there were no changes in pulmonary mechanics. These findings are relevant since a previous report demonstrated that treatment of lung primordia from mice with and without exposure to nitrofen and subsequent treatment with fibroblast growth factor (FGF) resulted in cystic changes within the lung (19). There was also no difference in inspiratory capacity between VEGF-treated and saline-treated mice, despite increased total lung volume as measured by volume-displacement in VEGF-treated mice. It is possible that additional alveolar recruitment maneuvers are necessary to reflect the increased lung volume observed in the VEGF-treated group. On morphometric analyses, VEGF-treated mice displayed both increased alveolar volume and septal surface area on POD 4. Most importantly, VEGF treatment resulted in an increase in total alveolar count, an effect that persisted even on POD 10. Interestingly, the alveolar count decreased from POD 4 to POD 10 in the VEGF group, which may represent a resorption of immature alveoli created in the early phase of VEGF treatment. In adult mice, a decrease in alveolar count without changes in lung volume has been observed over the course of lung development (20). VEGF treatment seemed to replicate this process, albeit within a much shorter duration. Additionally, IHC labeling of lung sections with VE-Cadherin showed uniform staining of alveolar septa, suggesting that the increase in alveolar units and septal surface area was accompanied by an increase in vascularization and that VEGF administration led to an increase in total capillary volume. Our data also demonstrated that the observed volumetric, mechanical, and morphometric findings were associated with measurable changes in gene and protein expression. The activated state of pulmonary VEGFR2 was significantly increased by exogenous VEGF therapy after unilateral pneumonectomy in our study. Ding et al similarly observed that the process of compensatory lung growth was highly dependent on VEGFR2, with the proliferation of both pulmonary capillary endothelial cells and type II pneumocytes significantly impaired in endothelial-specific VEGFR2 knockout mice (21). This group also demonstrated that the proliferation of pulmonary epithelial cells is dependent on endothelial cell-derived growth factors that act in a paracrine fashion. Based on our findings, it is possible that exogenous VEGF accelerates compensatory lung growth by directly stimulating pulmonary capillary endothelial cell proliferation via a VEGFR2-dependent mechanism, which subsequently induces alveolar epithelial cell growth and formation of new alveolar units. IHC analyses in fact confirmed increased cellular proliferation on POD 2 with VEGF treatment, as reflected by a higher Ki67 index. It should be noted that this relationship in Ki67 index reversed on POD 4, when cellular proliferation was higher in the control group. These findings are consistent with our conclusion that VEGF accelerated compensatory lung growth. With exogenous VEGF, the proliferative phase of lung growth had largely finished by POD 4, leading to a decrease in Ki67 index. It should also be noted that in a previous study by our group, the administration of a VEGFR2 inhibitor in the form of an antibody (DC101) or small chemical inhibitor (SU11248) did not result in measurable changes in lung growth (8). There could be two explanations for this observation. First, other angiogenic growth factors could likely contribute to compensatory lung growth and compensate for VEGF in the face of its receptor’s blockade. On the other hand, these agents might not have provided sufficient blockade of VEGFR2 when administered at the provided doses and a dose-response study could have provided different results. This study also demonstrated a significant increase in the expression of EGF mRNA in VEGF-treated mice after unilateral pneumonectomy. ELISA, however, failed to detect EGF levels in lung tissues, probably a result of its small size, secretory nature, and lack of interaction with the extracellular matrix that contributed to its low local concentrations (22). Although not reaching statistical significance, there was also an increase in activation of EGFR, supporting the finding of increased EGF transcription. Ding et al reported that activation of VEGFR2 resulted in an up-regulation of matrix-metalloproteinase (MMP)-14, which in turn released EGF-like ligands, such as heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF), and induced alveolar epithelial cell proliferation (21). Interestingly, in our study, treatment with VEGF did not alter the levels of MMP14 or HB-EGF, suggesting that exogenous VEGF upregulated EGF in a mechanism that is separate from natural compensatory lung growth. A major limitation of this study was the lack of equivalency between a left pneumonectomy model, which was done on healthy lungs, and pulmonary hypoplasia associated with CDH. Another limitation was the use of a compensatory lung growth model to simulate the process of lung development. While lung development is distinctly different from compensatory lung growth after pneumonectomy, there are fundamental commonalities between these two processes. They are both driven by mechanical stress created by either a symmetrically enlarging thorax (lung development) or by an asymmetrical empty space (compensatory growth), with the hypoxia-induced factor (HIF)-VEGF axis playing a critical role in both models (23). Additionally, at the level of gene transcription, post-pneumonectomy lungs have been shown to first dedifferentiate before undergoing redevelopment, a process that recapitulates the late alveolar stage of lung development (24).
  22 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  A principle for counting tissue structures on random sections.

Authors:  E R WEIBEL; D M GOMEZ
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 3.  Comparative analysis of the mechanical signals in lung development and compensatory growth.

Authors:  Connie C W Hsia
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 4.  Quantitative microscopy of the lung: a problem-based approach. Part 2: stereological parameters and study designs in various diseases of the respiratory tract.

Authors:  Christian Mühlfeld; Matthias Ochs
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 5.  Epidermal growth factor.

Authors:  G Carpenter; S Cohen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-05-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Vascular endothelial growth factor gene therapy increases survival, promotes lung angiogenesis, and prevents alveolar damage in hyperoxia-induced lung injury: evidence that angiogenesis participates in alveolarization.

Authors:  Bernard Thébaud; Faruqa Ladha; Evangelos D Michelakis; Monika Sawicka; Gavin Thurston; Farah Eaton; Kyoko Hashimoto; Gwyneth Harry; Alois Haromy; Greg Korbutt; Stephen L Archer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Mechanostructural adaptations preceding postpneumonectomy lung growth.

Authors:  Barry C Gibney; Jan P Houdek; Kenji Chamoto; Grace S Lee; Maximilian Ackermann; Miao Lin; Dinee Collings-Simpson; Moritz A Konerding; Akira Tsuda; Steven J Mentzer
Journal:  Exp Lung Res       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression in human fetal lung in vitro.

Authors:  M J Acarregui; S T Penisten; K L Goss; K Ramirez; J M Snyder
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.914

9.  Microscopic wire guide-based orotracheal mouse intubation: description, evaluation and comparison with transillumination.

Authors:  J Hamacher; M Arras; F Bootz; M Weiss; R Schramm; U Moehrlen
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Endothelial-derived angiocrine signals induce and sustain regenerative lung alveolarization.

Authors:  Bi-Sen Ding; Daniel J Nolan; Peipei Guo; Alexander O Babazadeh; Zhongwei Cao; Zev Rosenwaks; Ronald G Crystal; Michael Simons; Thomas N Sato; Stefan Worgall; Koji Shido; Sina Y Rabbany; Shahin Rafii
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  6 in total

1.  Investigation of the mechanisms of VEGF-mediated compensatory lung growth: the role of the VEGF heparin-binding domain.

Authors:  Lumeng J Yu; Victoria H Ko; Duy T Dao; Jordan D Secor; Amy Pan; Bennet S Cho; Paul D Mitchell; Hiroko Kishikawa; Diane R Bielenberg; Mark Puder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Intranasal delivery of VEGF enhances compensatory lung growth in mice.

Authors:  Duy T Dao; Jacqueline T Vuong; Lorenzo Anez-Bustillos; Amy Pan; Paul D Mitchell; Gillian L Fell; Meredith A Baker; Diane R Bielenberg; Mark Puder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A paradoxical method to enhance compensatory lung growth: Utilizing a VEGF inhibitor.

Authors:  Duy T Dao; Lorenzo Anez-Bustillos; Sahir S Jabbouri; Amy Pan; Hiroko Kishikawa; Paul D Mitchell; Gillian L Fell; Meredith A Baker; Randolph S Watnick; Hong Chen; Michael S Rogers; Diane R Bielenberg; Mark Puder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Alveologenesis: What Governs Secondary Septa Formation.

Authors:  Alexandra L Rippa; Elena V Alpeeva; Andrey V Vasiliev; Ekaterina A Vorotelyak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Effects of uteroplacental insufficiency on growth-restricted rats with altered lung development: A metabolomic analysis.

Authors:  Merryl Esther Yuliana; Zheng-Hao Huang; Hsiu-Chu Chou; Chung-Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.569

6.  Lipopolysaccharide-induced murine lung injury results in long-term pulmonary changes and downregulation of angiogenic pathways.

Authors:  S T Tsikis; S C Fligor; T I Hirsch; A Pan; L J Yu; H Kishikawa; M M Joiner; P D Mitchell; M Puder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.