Literature DB >> 29637899

Markerless motion estimation for motion-compensated clinical brain imaging.

Andre Z Kyme1, Stephen Se, Steven R Meikle, Roger R Fulton.   

Abstract

Motion-compensated brain imaging can dramatically reduce the artifacts and quantitative degradation associated with voluntary and involuntary subject head motion during positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT). However, motion-compensated imaging protocols are not in widespread clinical use for these modalities. A key reason for this seems to be the lack of a practical motion tracking technology that allows for smooth and reliable integration of motion-compensated imaging protocols in the clinical setting. We seek to address this problem by investigating the feasibility of a highly versatile optical motion tracking method for PET, SPECT and CT geometries. The method requires no attached markers, relying exclusively on the detection and matching of distinctive facial features. We studied the accuracy of this method in 16 volunteers in a mock imaging scenario by comparing the estimated motion with an accurate marker-based method used in applications such as image guided surgery. A range of techniques to optimize performance of the method were also studied. Our results show that the markerless motion tracking method is highly accurate (<2 mm discrepancy against a benchmarking system) on an ethnically diverse range of subjects and, moreover, exhibits lower jitter and estimation of motion over a greater range than some marker-based methods. Our optimization tests indicate that the basic pose estimation algorithm is very robust but generally benefits from rudimentary background masking. Further marginal gains in accuracy can be achieved by accounting for non-rigid motion of features. Efficiency gains can be achieved by capping the number of features used for pose estimation provided that these features adequately sample the range of head motion encountered in the study. These proof-of-principle data suggest that markerless motion tracking is amenable to motion-compensated brain imaging and holds good promise for a practical implementation in clinical PET, SPECT and CT systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29637899     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aabd48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Data-Driven Motion Detection and Event-by-Event Correction for Brain PET: Comparison with Vicra.

Authors:  Yihuan Lu; Mika Naganawa; Takuya Toyonaga; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Kathryn Fontaine; Silin Ren; Enette Mae Revilla; Tim Mulnix; Richard E Carson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 11.082

2.  Adaptive data-driven motion detection and optimized correction for brain PET.

Authors:  Enette Mae Revilla; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Mika Naganawa; Takuya Toyonaga; Kathryn Fontaine; Tim Mulnix; John A Onofrey; Richard E Carson; Yihuan Lu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 3.  MRI-Driven PET Image Optimization for Neurological Applications.

Authors:  Yuankai Zhu; Xiaohua Zhu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Brain PET motion correction using 3D face-shape model: the first clinical study.

Authors:  Yuma Iwao; Go Akamatsu; Hideaki Tashima; Miwako Takahashi; Taiga Yamaya
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.258

5.  Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks Aided Motion Correction of Dynamic 18F-FDG PET Brain Studies.

Authors:  Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar; David Iommi; Otto Muzik; Zacharias Chalampalakis; Eva-Maria Klebermass; Marius Hienert; Lucas Rischka; Rupert Lanzenberger; Andreas Hahn; Ekaterina Pataraia; Tatjana Traub-Weidinger; Johann Hummel; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.