Literature DB >> 29637832

Maximum level of mobility with axillary deployment of the Impella 5.0 is associated with improved survival.

Michele L Esposito1, Janelle Jablonski1, Allison Kras1, Sara Krasney1, Navin K Kapur1.   

Abstract

Mobility is an important prognostic indicator for patients with cardiogenic shock. No studies have quantified peak mobility for patients with cardiogenic shock who are supported with the Impella 5.0 acute mechanical circulatory support device. The purpose of our study was to evaluate mobility levels among patients with cardiogenic shock being treated with an axillary Impella 5.0 pump. We retrospectively analyzed data from 19 patients receiving an Impella 5.0 device for cardiogenic shock at our institution from 2013 to 2016. We used the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility Scale to quantify maximum mobility level achieved during active Impella 5.0 support. Higher scores on a scale of 1-8 indicated more mobility. Activity Measure for Post Acute Care Scores were quantified for each patient to assess activity limitations, with a maximum score 24. The mean age of the total cohort was 60 ± 12 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 16% ± 6%. In-hospital mortality was 47% (n = 9). Of the 19 Impella 5.0 implants, 10 survived, 6 died from withdrawal of care, and 3 died from worsening heart failure/cardiogenic shock. Similar rates of mobilization during the time of Impella implant were seen between groups. Compared to non-survivors, survivors achieved a higher maximum Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility level, but similar Activity Measure for Post Acute Care scores. In conclusion, maximum mobility after Impella 5.0 implantation may be associated with improved survival. The clinical utility of exercise as a therapeutic intervention for patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical circulatory support requires further study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemodynamics; mechanical circulatory support

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29637832     DOI: 10.1177/0391398817752575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Artif Organs        ISSN: 0391-3988            Impact factor:   1.595


  10 in total

1.  Concomitant use of Impella while on peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: de-escalate and ambulate.

Authors:  Letizia Fausta Bertoldi; Luca Bertoglio; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

2.  Surgical technique for the implantation of mechanical circulatory support with the Impella 5.0 pump in a patient with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Hamed Al Kalbani; Charles Juvin; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 3.  Awake and fully mobile patients on cardiac extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Darryl Abrams; A Reshad Garan; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 4.  A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Alexander G Truesdell; Mitchell A Psotka; Carolyn Rosner; Ramesh Singh; Shashank S Sinha; Abdulla A Damluji; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 12.035

5.  Budget Impact Associated with the Introduction of the Impella 5.0® Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for Cardiogenic Shock in France.

Authors:  Alexandre Le Guyader; Mathieu Pernot; Clément Delmas; Stéphane Roze; Isabelle Fau; Erwan Flecher; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-01-19

6.  Escalation and de-escalation of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Letizia F Bertoldi; Clement Delmas; Patrick Hunziker; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.803

7.  Weaning from Impella and mobilization of Impella patients.

Authors:  Letizia Fausta Bertoldi; Andrea Montisci; Clement Delmas; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.803

8.  Impella 5.0/5.5 Implantation via Innominate Artery: Further Expanding the Opportunities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Stephanie Bertolin; Giulia Maj; Corrado Cavozza; Astrid Cardinale; Alberto Pullara; Andrea Audo; Federico Pappalardo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Novel method for transaxillary Impella 5.0 implantation in patients with tortuous arterial anatomy.

Authors:  Bryant Fisher; Conrad Smith; Ibrahim Sultan; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2021-07-19

10.  Budget Impact Analysis of Impella CP® Utilization in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in France: A Health Economic Analysis.

Authors:  Clément Delmas; Mathieu Pernot; Alexandre Le Guyader; Romain Joret; Stéphane Roze; Guillaume Lebreton
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.845

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.