| Literature DB >> 29637550 |
Shiqi Li1, Jiasi Zhang2, Meiling Wang1, Gang Fu2, Yunyan Li1, Li Pei2, Zhouxing Xiong1, Dabing Qin2, Rui Zhang1, Xiaobo Tian2, Zhihao Wei1, Run Chen2, Xuejiao Chen1, Jia Wan2, Jun Chen1, Xia Wei2, Yanmin Xu1, Pei Zhang2, Ping Wang2, Xi Peng2, Sainan Yang2, Junjie Shen1, Zhi Yang1, Jieping Chen2, Cheng Qian1.
Abstract
T cells modified with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) containing either CD28 or 4-1BB (also termed TNFRSF9, CD137) costimulatory signalling have shown great potential in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). However, the difference between CD28 and 4-1BB costimulatory signalling in CAR-T treatment has not been well elucidated in clinical trials. In this study, we treated 10 relapsed or refractory ALL patients with the second generation CD19 CAR-T. The first 5 patients were treated with CD28-CAR and the other 5 patients were treated with 4-1BB CAR-T. All the 10 patients were response-evaluable. Three patients achieved complete remission and 1 patient with extramedullary disease achieved partial response after CD28-CAR-T treatment. In the 4-1BB CAR-T treatment group, 3 patients achieved complete remission. Furthermore, FLT-3 ligand (FLT3LG) was highly correlated with response time and may serve as a prognosis factor. No severe adverse events were observed in these 10 treated patients. Our study showed that both CD28 CAR-T and 4-1BB CAR-T both worked for response but they differed in response pattern (peak reaction time, reaction lasting time and reaction degree), adverse events, cytokine secretion and immune-suppressive factor level.Entities:
Keywords: CD19; CD28/4-1BB costimulatory signalling; Chimeric antigen receptor-T therapy; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29637550 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998