Literature DB >> 29637509

Safety, efficacy and survival of patients with primary malignant brain tumours (PMBT) in phase I (Ph1) trials: the 12-year Royal Marsden experience.

Niamh Coleman1, Vasiliki Michalarea1, Scheryll Alken1, Karim Rihawi1, Raquel Perez Lopez2, Nina Tunariu2, Ann Petruckevitch1, L R Molife1, Udai Banerji1, Johann S De Bono1, Liam Welsh3, Frank Saran3, Juanita Lopez4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary malignant brain tumours (PMBT) constitute less than 2% of all malignancies and carry a dismal prognosis. Treatment options at relapse are limited. First-in-human solid tumour studies have historically excluded patients with PMBT due to the poor prognosis, concomitant drug interactions and concerns regarding toxicities.
METHODS: Retrospective data were collected on clinical and tumour characteristics of patients referred for consideration of Ph1 trials in the Royal Marsden Hospital between June 2004 and August 2016. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards model. Chi squared test was used to measure bivariate associations between categorical variables.
RESULTS: 100pts with advanced PMBT were referred. At initial consultation, patients had a median ECOG PS 1, median age 48 years (range 18-70); 69% were men, 76% had glioblastoma; 68% were on AEDs, 63% required steroid therapy; median number of prior treatments was two. Median OS for patients treated on a Ph1 trials was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.9-12.9) versus 5.3 months (95% CI 4.1-6.1) for patients that did not proceed with a Ph1 trial, p = 0.0094. Steroid use, poor PS, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and treatment on a Ph1 trial were shown to independently influence OS.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a survival benefit for patients with PMBT treated on Ph1 trials. Toxicity and efficacy outcomes were comparable to the general Ph1 population. In the absence of an internationally recognized standard second line treatment for patients with recurrent PMBT, more Ph1 trials should allow enrolment of patients with refractory PMBT and Ph1 trial participation should be considered at an earlier stage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug development; Glioblastoma; High grade glioma; Malignant brain tumour; Phase I

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29637509     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2847-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  26 in total

1.  Defining the risk of toxicity in phase I oncology trials of novel molecularly targeted agents: a single centre experience.

Authors:  L R Molife; S Alam; D Olmos; M Puglisi; K Shah; R Fehrmann; L Trani; A Tjokrowidjaja; J S de Bono; U Banerji; S B Kaye
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity are independent risk factors for poor outcome in patients with high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Lola B Chambless; Scott L Parker; Laila Hassam-Malani; Matthew J McGirt; Reid C Thompson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Trends in the risks and benefits to patients with cancer participating in phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Thomas G Roberts; Bernardo H Goulart; Lee Squitieri; Sarah C Stallings; Elkan F Halpern; Bruce A Chabner; G Scott Gazelle; Stan N Finkelstein; Jeffrey W Clark
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Inclusion of patients with brain metastases in phase I trials: an unmet need.

Authors:  Mrinal M Gounder; David R Spriggs
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Vinay K Puduvalli; Marc C Chamberlain; Martin J van den Bent; Antoine F Carpentier; Lawrence M Cher; Warren Mason; Michael Weller; Shengyan Hong; Luna Musib; Astra M Liepa; Donald E Thornton; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jigisha P Thakkar; Therese A Dolecek; Craig Horbinski; Quinn T Ostrom; Donita D Lightner; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; John L Villano
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Persistent outpatient hyperglycemia is independently associated with decreased survival after primary resection of malignant brain astrocytomas.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Muraya Gathinji; Frank Attenello; Khoi Than; Amado Jimenez Ruiz; Alessandro Olivi; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Association between hyperglycemia and survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Rachel L Derr; Xiaobu Ye; Melissa U Islas; Serena Desideri; Christopher D Saudek; Stuart A Grossman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in prostate cancer: evidence from 16,266 patients.

Authors:  Xiaobin Gu; Xianshu Gao; Xiaoying Li; Xin Qi; Mingwei Ma; Shangbin Qin; Hao Yu; Shaoqian Sun; Dong Zhou; Wen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory response biomarkers in patients with sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma and the establishment of a nomogram.

Authors:  Liangyou Gu; Xin Ma; Hongzhao Li; Luyao Chen; Yongpeng Xie; Chaofei Zhao; Guoxiong Luo; Xu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Steroids use and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Agostina De Stefani; Antonio Ghidini; Lorenza Bruschieri; Valentina Riboldi; Lorenzo Dottorini; Alessandro Iaculli; Alberto Zaniboni; Francesca Trevisan
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.849

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.