Literature DB >> 29637257

Accuracy and impact of prenatal diagnosis in infants with omphalocele.

Peter Conner1, Jenny Hammarqvist Vejde1, Carmen Mesas Burgos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associated anomalies in omphalocele are common, but to which extent these anomalies are diagnosed before or after birth is less well documented. AIM: To investigate the different types of associated anomalies, long-term survival and the extent whether these are diagnosed pre- or postnatally in children with a prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele at a single institution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of all pregnancies with omphalocele managed and/or born at our institution between 2006 and 2016.
RESULTS: A total of 42 cases with prenatally diagnosed omphalocele were identified. Of those 14 (31%) decided to terminate the pregnancy (TOP). Of the remaining 28 that continued, 12 were giant omphaloceles. The overall mortality rate was 18, 25% for giant and 12% for non-giant omphaloceles. 64% had associated anomalies. Only 1/3 of these anomalies is diagnosed prenatally.
CONCLUSION: The rate of associated malformations that are diagnosed postnatally is high, but the majority was malformations with a minor clinical significance or impact on future health. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome was present only in cases of non-giant omphalocele in our cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome; Exomphalos; Malformations; Omphalocele; Prenatal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29637257      PMCID: PMC5954074          DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4265-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


Introduction

Omphalocele is an abdominal wall defect with a birth prevalence of 1 per 4000 livebirths, but a higher incidence if stillbirths and terminations of pregnancy are also taken into account [1-3]. The high rate of associated anomalies and genetic disorders often leads to a termination of pregnancy [3-6]. A non-isolated fetal omphalocele, with an abnormal karyotype and/or associated malformations, constitutes 67–88% of all pregnancies with omphalocele [3-6]. Cardiac and gastrointestinal anomalies are the most common (40–50%), but a broad spectrum of anomalies has been reported [7-10]. Overall, both numerical and structural chromosome anomalies are known to be present in 30–40% of pregnancies with fetal omphalocele [3, 11]. Overall survival rates for liveborn children with omphalocele depend on the severity of the associated anomalies [12, 13]. Isolated cases with omphalocele usually carry a good prognosis [14-16]. Despite improvements in the quality of prenatal examinations and access to both MRI, high-resolution and 3D ultrasound, a large proportion of the associated anomalies will not be diagnosed until after birth [8, 14, 15], and may influence the outcome of the children. The aim of this study was to document long-term outcomes of prenatally diagnosed omphalocele, to describe the rate and types of associated anomalies diagnosed before and after birth at a single Institution during a 10-year period, and to investigate how these associated anomalies and genetic syndromes affect long-term survival and morbidity.

Materials and methods

Medical records, including ultrasound reports, from all pregnancies with omphalocele assessed, monitored and managed at our institution between 2006 and 2016 were reviewed. Both cases where the parents decided to continue the pregnancy following a prenatal diagnosis with complete investigation including full karyotyping and detailed ultrasound examination, as well as those that decided to proceed with a termination of pregnancy (TOP) following the diagnosis of omphalocele, with or without associated anomalies, were included. Data on patient demographics, prenatal imaging, gestational age at birth or TOP, mode of delivery, surgical management, associated anomalies and timing of diagnosis, time to full enteral nutrition, length of hospital stay (LOS), short- and long-term complications were collected from patients records. Postnatal morbidity was defined as either daily use of medications or frequent follow-up for a chronic condition, and/or impairment of neurocognitive, psychomotor or physical capacity. Data are presented as absolute values (n), frequencies (%), mean ± SD, median and ranks. Patients were divided into giant omphaloceles (≥ 5 cm defect with the major part of the liver herniated) or non-giant omphaloceles, as well as isolated vs non-isolated (with any associated chromosomal or structural anomaly) omphaloceles. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and Mann–Whitney test for numerical variables, with p values < 0.05 considered significant. All data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (La Jolla, CA).

Results

A total of 42 cases of prenatally diagnosed omphaloceles were identified that had been assessed in the second trimester during the period 2006 to 2016. Of these pregnancies, 33% (14) opted for medical termination and there were three cases of spontaneous termination: one miscarriage at 18 gestational weeks (gw), and two cases of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) that occurred at 22 and 24 gw. In the group of terminations, both medical and spontaneous (n = 17), 71% were Giant Omphaloceles and 64% had an associated anomaly. In the remaining 25 patients with a prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele that decided to continue their pregnancy, 40% (10/25) were cases of giant omphaloceles. The mean maternal age was 31.7 years (rank 24–38 years), and the mean gestational age at delivery for live born with omphalocele was 36.2 ± 2.58 SD weeks (median 37.2). There were no differences in gender between the groups. There was one case of twin pregnancy. The follow-up time of live born patients with Omphalocele ranged from 1 month to 11 years. (median follow-up time 44 months). All the 25 live born patients underwent surgical repair. The median age at the time of first surgery was 1 day of life (DOL), and the abdomen was closed at a median age of 2 DOL. In 52% (13/25) of cases primary closure of the abdominal wall defect was possible. Preformed Silo bag was used in 32% (8/25) of cases and a patch (synthetic or biological) was used in 36% (9/25). The median length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly higher in children with giant omphaloceles as well as in those with associated anomalies (Table 1). The postnatal mortality rate for all cases with omphalocele was 8% (2/25 cases), at 6 weeks and 5 months of age, respectively, one of them constituting a case of giant omphalocele. One infant died due to severe pulmonary hypoplasia and pulmonary hypertension, the other patient died at an external institution.
Table 1

Characteristics of the cohort with omphalocele divided into subgroups: isolated vs non-isolated, and giant vs non-giant, pairwise comparisons with Fisher’s and Mann–Whitney’s test (p < 0.05)

All omphaloceleIsolatedbNon-isolatedGiantNon-giant
Prenatally diagnosed omphalocele 2006–20164214 (33%)28 (67%)22 (52%)20 (48%)
Continued pregnancy (n/%)28 (67%)9 (32%)19 (68%)12 (43%)16 (57%)
TOPa (n/%)14 (33%)5 (36%)9 (64%)10 (71%)4 (29%)
Live born (n/%)25 (89%)8 (32%)17 (68%)10 (40%)15 (60%)
Live born survival (n/%)23 (92%)8 (100%)15 (88%)9 (90%)14 (93%)
Overall survival (%)82%a89%79%75%88%
Associated structural anomaliesc (n/%)15 (54%)6 (50%)9 (56%)
Genetic syndromesc (n/%)8 (29%)1 (8%)7 (44%)*
Any associated anomalyc (n/%)18 (64%)7 (58%)11 (69%)
LOS median (days)1227*4715*
Time to full enteral nutrition, median (days)810207*

Pairwise comparisons, isolated vs non-isolated, giant vs non-giant, Fisher’s test and Mann–Whitney`s test (p < 0.05)*

aTermination of pregnancy after prenatal counseling

bTruly isolated following prenatal and postnatal assessment

cAssociated structural anomalies or genetic syndromes in continuing pregnancies (n = 28)

Characteristics of the cohort with omphalocele divided into subgroups: isolated vs non-isolated, and giant vs non-giant, pairwise comparisons with Fisher’s and Mann–Whitney’s test (p < 0.05) Pairwise comparisons, isolated vs non-isolated, giant vs non-giant, Fisher’s test and Mann–Whitney`s test (p < 0.05)* aTermination of pregnancy after prenatal counseling bTruly isolated following prenatal and postnatal assessment cAssociated structural anomalies or genetic syndromes in continuing pregnancies (n = 28) In the group of giant omphaloceles the mortality rate was 10% (1/10), whereas the mortality was only 7% (1/15) for non-giant omphaloceles.

Associated anomalies

Associated anomalies were present in 67% (28/42) of all cases with prenatally diagnosed omphaloceles and in 68% (19/28) of pregnancies with omphalocele intending to continue pregnancy following prenatal evaluation. Of the cases that decided not to continue the pregnancy (n = 14), 64% had an associated anomaly: (1) Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), (2) ventricular septum defects (VSD), (3) Cantrell’s pentalogy, two cases of trisomy 18 and one with congenital scoliosis. At prenatal assessment, associated anomalies were found in only 32% (9/28) of the cases that continued pregnancy and in the remaining 68% (19/28) the omphalocele was considered to be isolated. However, following postnatal examinations or adding information from necropsy, another 36% (10/28) turned out to have an additional anomaly. In the end, only 32% (9/28) were truly isolated cases by definition. Additional anomalies were also found after birth in five out of the nine patients already diagnosed to have associated malformations before birth. Putting it all together, 68% (19/28) of the pregnancies intending to continue had associated anomalies. A total of 32 anomalies were present in these 19 patients summarized in Table 2. Overall, only one-third (10/32) of all the associated anomalies were diagnosed prenatally. The rate of associated anomalies was higher in non-giant omphaloceles compared to cases of giant omphaloceles (Table 1). Although isolated cases and non-giant omphaloceles had better survival rates, the differences were not statistically significant in our cohort (Table 1).
Table 2

Prenatal (a) and postnatally (b) detected associated anomalies among cases of giant and non-giant omphalocele

(a)
Prenatal detection of associated anomaliesn = 9/28 patientsn = 10 malformationsGiant omphalocele (n = 12 patients)Non-giant omphalocele (n = 16 patients)
Cardiovascular and pulmonary
 ASD1
 VSD3
 Overriding aorta1
 Interrupted IHVC11
Gastro-intestinal
 Esophageal atresia1
 Gallbladder agenesis1
Uro-genital
 Unilateral renal agenesis1
Prenatal (a) and postnatally (b) detected associated anomalies among cases of giant and non-giant omphalocele Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) was present in 25% of all children with omphalocele, but was only observed in cases with non-giant omphaloceles. The rate of BWS in cases with non-giant omphalocele was 43%. Despite the high rate of associated anomalies, more than 70% of surviving children born with omphalocele had non-significant morbidity, with only a minor impact on their quality of life.

Discussion

Despite extensive prenatal evaluation with ultrasound performed by a fetal medicine specialist at a tertiary level referral center over a 10-year period, many of the infants with a prenatal diagnosed omphalocele turned out to have additional anomalies that were diagnosed first after birth, almost two-thirds (22/32). Many of the anomalies diagnosed postnatally were considered to be of minor importance, and all patients with associated anomalies diagnosed exclusively at this time survived. However, it is important to be aware of the high rate of associated anomalies that will be diagnosed following birth when counseling parents to pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele. In our cohort, 33% opted for TOP after prenatal counseling, which is lower than the numbers stated in general in the Swedish national registry of congenital malformations. This may be due to the fact that almost all parents were counseled by a multidisciplinary team following a prenatal diagnosis, implicating that the expecting parents may receive more precise information and an accurate prognosis than what is usually offered at non-tertiary centers. In general in Sweden, approximately 60% of pregnancies with a prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele are terminated [17]. In the majority of these cases, chromosomal abnormalities or associated major anomalies are present, leaving a selected population of infants born with omphalocele where prenatal diagnosis in the second trimester has assessed the malformation to be isolated. However, the findings in our study indicate that the actual proportion of infants with an isolated omphalocele is low, only 32%. Among the cases that opted for TOP; the rate of associated anomalies did not differ from those who continued their pregnancy, but the anomalies were all severe in this group. Overall, we found a total of 32 associated anomalies among our 19 non-isolated cases of children born with omphalocele. Despite the high numbers of non-isolated cases, most of these children in our cohort live an apparently healthy and normal life. The expect rum of anomalies described are in accordance with previous reports [8, 9, 18, 19]. Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) was to a very large extent associated with non-giant omphalocele. BWS, is an over-growth disorder characterized by neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, macroglossia, hemihypertrophy, visceromegaly and with a risk to develop embryonal tumors (Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma, neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma). The syndrome can be diagnosed through molecular testing, demonstrating either abnormalities involving chromosome 11p15, disturbed methylation or uniparental disomy in approximately 80% of cases [20, 21]. This was the only chromosomal aberration found postnatally among babies born with omphalocele, since those with a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18, had already terminated their pregnancies. Prenatal investigation of BWS was not routinely offered at our institution in pregnancies with omphalocele until the last year of the study period explaining why we did not have any cases of BWS with a prenatal diagnosis. Clinical signs of BWS, e.g. macrosomia and macroglossia often appear late in the third trimester, a period of pregnancy during which genetic testing and also TOP is not performed or allowed in our setting. Despite the fact that giant omphalocele constitutes a more severe defect in terms of surgical management, the rate of associated anomalies was lower than in cases with non-giant omphaloceles. The survival rate in the group with giant omphaloceles was lower, but not significantly different to non-giant omphaloceles most likely due to the small number of cases. Isolated cases of omphalocele have been reported to have better outcomes [14-16]. We did not find any significant differences in terms of survival between the two groups. This could be due to relatively small numbers in our cohort, one of the major limitations of this study. In our center, the preferred approach is to perform surgery with the aim to try to close the defect, including the larger defects with a staged closure. In other centers a different approach is taken, large omphaloceles are managed conservatively, allowing the sac to epithelialize and postponing surgery till later in life [22]. In conclusion, we believe that the results of this study are important to conceive when counseling parents following a prenatal diagnosis of omphalocele, since many of the non-severe anomalies will not be diagnosed before birth, but at the same time will probably not affect survival. Cases with either severe associated anomalies or chromosomal aberrations differ from non-severe cases both in terms of survival and morbidity deeply affecting the outcome. Moreover, despite the large number of associated anomalies, our long-term data reveal that the majority of children live born with omphalocele suffer no major co-morbidity and will have a good quality of life.
  21 in total

1.  Omphalocele: comparison of outcome following prenatal or postnatal diagnosis.

Authors:  T E Cohen-Overbeek; W H Tong; T R Hatzmann; J F Wilms; L C P Govaerts; R J H Galjaard; E A P Steegers; W C J Hop; J W Wladimiroff; D Tibboel
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Isolated fetal omphalocele, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Louise Wilkins-Haug; Amina Porter; Pam Hawley; Carol B Benson
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2009-01

Review 3.  Congenital abdominal wall defects and reconstruction in pediatric surgery: gastroschisis and omphalocele.

Authors:  Daniel J Ledbetter
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Cardiovascular malformations associated with omphalocele.

Authors:  R D Greenwood; A Rosenthal; A S Nadas
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Omphalocele and gastroschisis and associated malformations.

Authors:  Claude Stoll; Yves Alembik; Beatrice Dott; Marie-Paule Roth
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Gastroschisis and omphalocele in Singapore: a ten-year series from 1993 to 2002.

Authors:  K B Tan; K H Tan; S K Chew; G S Yeo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Chromosomal anomalies in newborns with omphalocele.

Authors:  D St-Vil; K S Shaw; M Lallier; S Yazbeck; M Di Lorenzo; A Grignon; H Blanchard
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Prevalence, Correlates, and Outcomes of Omphalocele in the United States, 1995-2005.

Authors:  Jennifer Marshall; Jason L Salemi; Jean Paul Tanner; Rema Ramakrishnan; Marcia L Feldkamp; Lisa K Marengo; Robert E Meyer; Charlotte M Druschel; Russel Rickard; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Frequency of anomalies and hospital outcomes in infants with gastroschisis and omphalocele.

Authors:  Kristin M Corey; Christoph P Hornik; Matthew M Laughon; Kerstin McHutchison; Reese H Clark; P Brian Smith
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.699

10.  Omphalocele with intra abdominal anomalies.

Authors:  Muataz A Al Ani; Safira A Ali Khan
Journal:  J Neonatal Surg       Date:  2014-01-01
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Christina M Bence; Amy J Wagner
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2021-05

2.  A multi-country study of prevalence and early childhood mortality among children with omphalocele.

Authors:  Wendy N Nembhard; Jorieke E H Bergman; Maria D Politis; Jazmín Arteaga-Vázquez; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Mark A Canfield; Janet D Cragan; Saeed Dastgiri; Hermien E K de Walle; Marcia L Feldkamp; Amy Nance; Miriam Gatt; Boris Groisman; Paula Hurtado-Villa; Kärin Kallén; Danielle Landau; Nathalie Lelong; Jorge Lopez-Camelo; Laura Martinez; Margery Morgan; Anna Pierini; Anke Rissmann; Antonin Šípek; Elena Szabova; Giovanna Tagliabue; Wladimir Wertelecki; Ignacio Zarante; Marian K Bakker; Vijaya Kancherla; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.661

3.  The validity of the viscero-abdominal disproportion ratio for type of surgical closure in all fetuses with an omphalocele.

Authors:  Nina C J Peters; Annelieke Hijkoop; Rosan L Lechner; Alex J Eggink; Joost van Rosmalen; Dick Tibboel; René M H Wijnen; Hanneke IJsselstijn; Titia E Cohen-Overbeek
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Omphalocele: national current birth prevalence and survival.

Authors:  Anna Fogelström; Cecilia Caldeman; Jenny Oddsberg; Anna Löf Granström; Carmen Mesas Burgos
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 5.  Major abdominal wall defects in the low- and middle-income setting: current status and priorities.

Authors:  Lofty-John Chukwuemeka Anyanwu; Niyi Ade-Ajayi; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Caldesmon ablation in mice causes umbilical herniation and alters contractility of fetal urinary bladder smooth muscle.

Authors:  Sandra Pütz; Lisa Sophie Barthel; Marina Frohn; Doris Metzler; Mohammed Barham; Galyna Pryymachuk; Oliver Trunschke; Lubomir T Lubomirov; Jürgen Hescheler; Joseph M Chalovich; Wolfram F Neiss; Manuel Koch; Mechthild M Schroeter; Gabriele Pfitzer
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.