| Literature DB >> 29636758 |
Hazel Y Wetzstein1,2, Justin A Porter1, Jules Janick1, Jorge F S Ferreira3, Theophilus M Mutui4.
Abstract
Artemisinin, produced in the glandular trichomes of Artemisia annua L. is a vital antimalarial drug effective against Plasmodium falciparum resistant to quinine-derived medicines. Although work has progressed on the semi-synthetic production of artemisinin, field production of A. annua remains the principal commercial source of the compound. Crop production of artemisia must be increased to meet the growing worldwide demand for artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) to treat malaria. Grower artemisinin yields rely on plants generated from seeds from open-pollinated parents. Although selection has considerably increased plant artemisinin concentration in the past 15 years, seed-generated plants have highly variable artemisinin content that lowers artemisinin yield per hectare. Breeding efforts to produce improved F1 hybrids have been hampered by the inability to produce inbred lines due to self-incompatibility. An approach combining conventional hybridization and selection with clonal propagation of superior genotypes is proposed as a means to enhance crop yield and artemisinin production. Typical seed-propagated artemisia plants produce less than 1% (dry weight) artemisinin with yields below 25 kg/ha. Genotypes were identified producing high artemisinin levels of over 2% and possessing improved agronomic characteristics such as high leaf area and shoot biomass production. Field studies of clonally-propagated high-artemisinin plants verified enhanced plant uniformity and an estimated gross primary productivity of up to 70 kg/ha artemisinin, with a crop density of one plant m-2. Tissue culture and cutting protocols for the mass clonal propagation of A. annua were developed for shoot regeneration, rooting, acclimatization, and field cultivation. Proof of concept studies showed that both tissue culture-regenerated plants and rooted cutting performed better than plants derived from seed in terms of uniformity, yield, and consistently high artemisinin content. Use of this technology to produce plants with homogeneously-high artemisinin can help farmers markedly increase the artemisinin yield per cultivated area. This would lead to increased profit to farmers and decreased prices of ACT.Entities:
Keywords: Artemisia annua; artemisinin; genotypes; malaria; tissue culture
Year: 2018 PMID: 29636758 PMCID: PMC5881154 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Artemisinin concentration per plant, and kg/ha from six selected clones of Artemisia annua.
| Genotype | Artemisinin (%) | Plant height (cm)z | Plant width (cm)z | Stem dry weight (kg)z | Leaf dry weightz | Artemisinin (kg/ha)z | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 2013 | Average | (kg) | (t/ha) | |||||
| C1 | 2.13 | 2.19 | 2.16a | 179ay | 113a | 0.69a | 0.32ab | 3.22 | 70.6 |
| C10 | 1.93 | 2.13 | 2.03ab | 188a | 106ab | 0.77a | 0.28ab | 2.81 | 59.9 |
| B6 | 1.65 | 2.21 | 1.93ab | 181a | 112ab | 0.67a | 0.26ab | 2.61 | 57.8 |
| P137 | 1.93 | 1.68 | 1.81bc | 192a | 111ab | 0.81a | 0.39a | 3.88 | 65.2 |
| P63 | 1.81 | 1.53 | 1.67c | 144b | 100bc | 0.44b | 0.25b | 2.46 | 37.7 |
| B4 | 1.83 | 1.37 | 1.60c | 140b | 89c | 0.34b | 0.27ab | 2.65 | 36.3 |
Effect of cutting type on rooting of two genotypes of Artemisia annua; n = 6 replicates of 18 cuttings each.
| B4 clone | C1 clone | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutting type | Rooting (%)z | Root dry weight (mg) | Rooting (mg) | Root dry weight (mg) |
| Tip | 97.2 a | 4.0 ab | 74.1 a | 11.3 a |
| Lateral tip | 89.8 b | 6.0 a | 88.3 a | 8.9 ab |
| One node | 100.0 a | 3.2 b | 87.4 a | 6.2 ab |
| Two nodes | 98.2 a | 4.7 ab | 90.5 a | 3.4 b |
| Average | 96.3 | 4.3 | 85.1 | 7.4 |
Effects of plant growth regulators on shoot and callus production in Artemisia annua cultures after 6 weeks; n = 24.
| BA (μM) | NAA (μM) | Shoot | Callus | No. shootsy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FW (g) | DW (g) | FW (g) | DW (g) | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0.69cz | 0.13c | 0b | 0b | 1.4c |
| 0.89 | 0.27 | 8.88 b | 0.86 b | 1.83 a | 0.20 a | 42.3 a |
| 1.78 | 0.27 | 12.56 a | 1.08 a | 1.30 ab | 0.13 ab | 26.9 b |
| 2.67 | 0.27 | 9.42 b | 0.92 ab | 2.45 a | 0.25 a | 20.1 b |
| 3.56 | 0.27 | 9.88 b | 0.81 b | 2.45 a | 0.24 a | 12.2 bc |
Effects of BA in combination with NAA on shoot and callus growth for different genotypes of Artemisia annua after 6 weeks.
| Treatment (μ | FW (g) | DW (g) | WC (%) | No. shootsy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA | NAA | Callus | Shoot | Callus | Shoot | Callus | Shoot | |
| 0.89 | 0.27 | 1.2 cz | 14.4 b | 0.1 c | 1.3 a | 1.1 c | 13.2 b | 55.2 a |
| 1.78 | 0.27 | 2.5 b | 15.6 ab | 0.2 b | 1.3 a | 2.3 b | 14.2 ab | 64.4 a |
| 3.56 | 0.27 | 3.9 a | 17.3 a | 0.3 a | 1.4 a | 3.5 a | 15.9 a | 54.1 a |
| C10 | 0.8 c | 18.5 b | 0.09 c | 1.6 a | 0.7 c | 16.8 b | 91.4 a | |
| B6 | 5.0 a | 16.0 c | 0.38 a | 1.4 b | 4.6 a | 14.6 c | 59.2 b | |
| MP11 | 1.9 bc | 21.9 a | 0.16 bc | 1.7 a | 1.7 bc | 20.2 a | 53.8 b | |
| 3M | 2.4 b | 6.6 d | 0.23 b | 0.6 c | 2.1 b | 6.0 d | 26.0 c | |
Effects of IBA concentration on the rooting of regenerated shoots in two genotypes of Artemisia annua after 4 weeks.
| IBA (μ | C10 clone | MP11 clone | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rooting (%) | No. roots | No. lateral roots | Rooting (%) | No. roots | No. lateral roots | |
| 0 | 8.3 cz | 0.1 c | 0.3 b | 22.2 c | 1.2 c | 1.0 b |
| 2.4 | 66.7 b | 2.2 c | 0.9 b | 70.4 b | 4.9 c | 1.3 b |
| 4.9 | 83.3 ab | 5.8 b | 2.3 b | 92.6 a | 12.3 b | 3.7 b |
| 9.8 | 100.0 a | 13.6 a | 5.1 a | 92.6 a | 26.3 a | 8.6 a |
Rooting response of different Artemisia annua genotypes after 4 weeks on media containing 9.8 μm IBA; n = 50.
| Genotype | Rooting (%) | No. roots |
|---|---|---|
| 3M | 98 az | 17.0 a |
| C10 | 100 a | 14.5 ab |
| B6 | 100 a | 9.6 bc |
| MP11 | 78 b | 6.2 c |
Artemisinin concentration (g/100 g DW) of leaves from field-grown plants of two cloned genotypes (3M and MP11) propagated by tissue culture or rooted cuttings.
| Plant material | Propagation method | Artemisinin (%) ( | RSDz (%) | Significance ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3M clone | Tissue culture | 0.78 | 14.4 | 0.83ns |
| Cutting | 0.76 | 14.7 | ||
| MP11 clone | Tissue culture | 0.79 | 10.4 | 1.00ns |
| Cutting | 0.78 | 5.86 | ||
| Open pollinated seedlings | 0.70 | 33.65 | N/A |
Plant growth characteristics of field-grown plants propagated by tissue culture or cuttings.
| Propagation methodz | Dry weight (g) | Leaf:shoot ratio | Leaf area (cm2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | Shoot | Root | Total plant | |||
| Cuttings | 225ay | 446a | 124a | 796a | 0.52a | 12.8a |
| Tissue culture | 198a | 415a | 102a | 714a | 0.48a | 13.1a |
The effect of growing conditions on artemisinin (ART), dihydroartemisinic acid (DHAA), and artemisinic acid (AA) content in three genotypes of Artemisia annua.
| Genotypez | Growth conditions | ART (%) | DHAA (%) | AA (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3M | Field | 1.94 ± 0.23 | 0.80 ± 0.13 | 0.10 ± 0.02 |
| Greenhouse | 1.80 ± 0.21 | 0.68 ± 0.12 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | |
| Tissue culture | 0.02 ± 0.02 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
| MP11 | Field | 1.21 ± 0.07 | 0.53 ± 0.16 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| Greenhouse | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.006 | |
| Tissue culture | 0.02 ± 0.06 | 0.08 ± 0.032 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | |
| C10y | Greenhouse | 1.23 ± 0.06 | 1.24 ± 0.12 | 0.32 ± 0.02 |
| Tissue culture | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.01 ± 0.002 |