| Literature DB >> 29636044 |
Lin-Na Guo1, Yan-Zong Yang1, Yun-Zhi Feng2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iron disorder and abnormal expression of hepcidin play important roles in many diseases, but it is still unclear in chronic periodontitis (CP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to assess ferritin and hepcidin levels in serum and saliva of CP patients with or without T2DM.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic periodontitis; Ferritin; Hepcidin; Saliva; Serum; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29636044 PMCID: PMC5894201 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0524-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Characteristics and periodontal parameters of participants
| Control | CP | T2DM | CP + T2DM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years, Mean ± SD) | 52.45 ± 10.01 | 58.09 ± 9.97 | 56.45 ± 11.80 | 62.82 ± 10.72 | 0.017a* |
| Gender, % ( | |||||
| Males | 64% (14) | 73% (16) | 68% (15) | 77% (17) | 0.779b |
| Females | 36% (8) | 27% (6) | 32% (7) | 23% (5) | |
| FBG (mg/dL, Mean ± SD) | 5.26 ± 0.55 | 5.27 ± 0.56 | 8.09 ± 2.22 | 7.64 ± 2.32 | < 0.001a* |
| BMI (Mean ± SD) | 24.43 ± 2.33 | 25.85 ± 3.51 | 25.48 ± 3.45 | 25.00 ± 2.34 | 0.471a |
| TG (mmol/L, Mean ± SD) | 1.95 ± 0.89 | 2.82 ± 4.66 | 2.27 ± 1.59 | 1.90 ± 1.14 | 0.435a |
| CHOL (mmol/L, Mean ± SD) | 5.00 ± 1.08 | 4.62 ± 0.85 | 4.44 ± 1.02 | 4.47 ± 1.18 | 0.284a |
| HDL (mmol/L, Median (IQR)) | 1.17 (1.03, 1.51) | 1.10 (0.93, 1.18) | 1.10 (0.97, 1.35) | 1.17 (0.94, 1.23) | 0.511c |
| LDL (mmol/L, Mean ± SD) | 2.88 ± 0.72 | 2.61 ± 0.82 | 2.52 ± 0.78 | 2.59 ± 1.03 | 0.523a |
| ALT (u/L, Median(IQR)) | 20.00 (14.03, 29.28) | 20.50 (13.10, 26.10) | 20.80 (15.33, 29.65) | 20.55 (15.55, 25.30) | 0.992c |
| AST (u/L, Mean ± SD) | 21.87 ± 4.95 | 22.29 ± 7.62 | 21.00 ± 6.43 | 22.40 ± 6.33 | 0.887a |
| PD (Mean ± SD) | 2.00 ± 0.71 | 2.80 ± 0.45 | 2.00 ± 0.65 | 3.02 ± 0.27 | < 0.001c* |
| CAL (Mean ± SD) | 0.08 ± 0.20 | 3.04 ± 0.32 | 0.26 ± 0.34 | 4.07 ± 0.17 | < 0.001c* |
| BI (Mean ± SD) | 0.18 ± 0.54 | 1.55 ± 0.64 | 0.37 ± 0.59 | 1.82 ± 0.47 | < 0.001c* |
| PI (Mean ± SD) | 1.00 ± 0.48 | 2.23 ± 0.55 | 1.28 ± 0.57 | 2.61 ± 0.29 | < 0.001c* |
T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, CP chronic periodontitis, CP + T2DM chronic periodontitis with type 2 diabetes mellitus, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, FBG fasting blood glucose, BMI body mass index, TG triglyceride, CHOL cholesterol, HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low density lipoprotein, ALT alanine transaminase, AST aspartate transaminase, PD probing pocket depth, CAL clinical attachment loss, PI plaque index, BI bleeding index
P1: Control vs CP; P2: Control vs T2DM + CP; P3: CP vs T2DM; P4: T2DM vs T2DM + CP
aAnalysis of variance (ANOVA)
bChi-square test
cKruskal-Wallis test
*Significantly different P < 0.05
Levels of ferritin, hepcidin and hepcidin/ferritin in serum and saliva
| Control | CP | T2DM | CP + T2DM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum ferritin (ng/ml, Median (IQR)) | 196.2 (106.6, 241.6) | 265.1 (166.1, 358.5) | 196.3 (88.8, 369.6) | 197.7 (128.9, 366.6) | |
| log serum ferritin (Mean ± SD) | 2.20 ± 0.32 | 2.42 ± 0.20 | 2.23 ± 0.40 | 2.38 ± 0.31 | |
| Serum hepcidin (ng/ml, Mean ± SD) | 179.37 ± 79.86 | 249.56 ± 77.15 | 197.92 ± 103.04 | 218.36 ± 94.05 | |
| Serum hepcidin/ferritin (Mean ± SD) | 1.00 ± 0.18 | 0.95 ± 0.26 | 1.00 ± 0.31 | 0.88 ± 0.24 | |
| Salivary ferritin (ng/ml, Median (IQR)) | 6.50 (5.49, 9.56) | 16.74 (8.44, 23.93) | 12.61 (7.47, 26.16) | 12.81 (7.42, 18.13) | |
| log salivary ferritin (Mean ± SD) | 0.83 ± 0.32 | 1.14 ± 0.36 | 1.11 ± 0.46 | 1.06 ± 0.30 | |
| Salivary hepcidin (ng/ml, Median (IQR)) | 1.12 (0.89, 1.73) | 1.64 (0.93, 3.19) | 1.79 (0.93, 5.14) | 1.54 (0.99, 3.80) | |
| 1/(salivary hepcidin) (Mean ± SD) | 0.84 ± 0.38 | 0.66 ± 0.44 | 0.62 ± 0.44 | 0.63 ± 0.36 | |
| Salivary hepcidin/ferritin | 0.17 (0.12, 0.37) | 0.11 (0.08, 0.34) | 0.18 (0.90, 0.39) | 0.13 (0.92, 0.34) | |
| log (salivary hepcidin/ferritin) (Mean ± SD) | −0.69 ± 0.34 | − 0.77 ± 0.51 | −0.72 ± 0.42 | − 0.77 ± 0.38 |
P1: Control vs CP; P2: Control vs T2DM + CP; P3: CP vs T2DM; P4: T2DM vs T2DM + CP; P5: Control vs T2DM
aAnalysis of covariance (ANCOVA)
*Significantly different P < 0.05
Fig. 1Box diagrams showing concentrations of ferritin, hepcidin, and hepcidin/ferritin (ng/mL, median [IQR]) in serum and saliva among the control, CP, T2DM, and T2DM with CP groups. Blue boxes represent control group participants, yellow boxes represent CP participants, purple boxes represent T2DM participants, and red boxes represent CP with T2DM participants. Median and interquartile range was presented by boxes, and maximum and minimum values were indicated using bars of each group. One indicator of both serum and saliva was put into one image. Shaded boxes represent indicators of saliva detection, whereas no shadows represent those of serum detection. Serum ferritin and hepcidin levels were significantly higher in the CP and CP with T2DM groups than in the control group (a, b, P* < 0.05). In addition, serum ferritin and hepcidin concentrations were significantly higher in the CP group than in the T2DM group (a, b, P* < 0.05). The change trend of serum hepcidin was similar to that of serum ferritin. The serum hepcidin/ferritin value was significantly lower in the CP with T2DM group than in the T2DM and control groups (c, P* < 0.05). Detection of saliva samples revealed higher ferritin levels in the CP and T2DM groups (a, P < 0.05). The salivary hepcidin levels were relatively low (b). Significant differences are indicated by asterisk (*, P < 0.05)
Fig. 2linear correlations between serum hepcidin levels and serum ferritin concentrations. We used the serum ferritin level as X, and the serum hepcidin level as Y. Dots of the graph represent the detected concentration value. Lines of the graph represent the linear correlation between them (R2 = 0.790, P < 0.001). The equation is presented in Fig. 2 (Y = 0.46X + 93.14).
Multiple linear regression analysis of serum ferritin, hepcidin, and hepcidin/ferritin
| Model | b | S.E. | b’ | t |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum ferritin | Constant | 503.687 | 108.718 | 4.633 | < 0.001* | |
| Gender | −100.828 | 37.012 | −0.265 | − 2.724 | 0.008* | |
| Age | −4.991 | 1.582 | −0.315 | −3.154 | 0.002* | |
| absence or presence of CP | 110.537 | 35.156 | 0.316 | 3.144 | 0.002* | |
| Serum hepcidin | Constant | 359.086 | 58.876 | 6.099 | < 0.001* | |
| Gender | −54.760 | 19.875 | −0.275 | −2.755 | 0.007* | |
| Age | −1.946 | 0.819 | −0.235 | −2.376 | 0.020* | |
| HDL | −30.911 | 15.367 | −0.203 | −2.012 | 0.048* | |
| absence or presence of CP | 47.604 | 18.327 | 0.260 | 2.598 | 0.011* | |
| Serum hepcidin/ferritin | Constant | 0.717 | 0.141 | 5.097 | < 0.001* | |
| Age | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.354 | 3.391 | 0.001* | |
| absence or presence of CP | −0.143 | 0.052 | −0.287 | −2.752 | 0.007* |
X1: gender (1 = male, 2 = female); X2: age (year); X3: BMI; X4: FBG (mg/dl); X5: TG (mmol/l); X6: CHOL (mmol/l); X7: HDL (mmol/l); X8: LDL (mmol/l); X9:ALT (u/l); X10:AST (u/l); X11: absence or presence of CP (1 = non-CP; 2 = CP); X12: absence or presence of T2DM (1 = non-DM; 2 = DM); X13: duration of T2DM (0 = non-T2DM, 1 = 1–5 years, 2 = 6–10 years, 3 = more than 10 years)
Stepwise method used; *Significantly different P < 0.05
Fig. 3Curve correlations between serum ferritin concentrations and salivary ferritin levels. We used salivary ferritin levels as X, and serum ferritin levels as Y. Dots of the graph represent the detected concentration of ferritin. Lines of the graph represent the fitted curves. The correlation was observed between them (R2 = 0.064, P = 0.017). The equation is presented in Fig. 3 (Y = exp. (5.46–1.17/X))