| Literature DB >> 29636032 |
A Villarruel-López1, D A López-de la Mora2, O D Vázquez-Paulino1, A G Puebla-Mora3, Ma R Torres-Vitela1, L A Guerrero-Quiroz4, K Nuño5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic use of leaves of M. oleifera has been evaluated in diabetes because of its possible capacity to decrease blood glucose and lipids concentration after ingestion, as result of the polyphenols content and others compounds. Nevertheless most results have been obtain from leaf extract, therefore this study would use leaf powder as the regular way of consumption of population to know effects over toxicity glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, corporal weight, and predominant groups of microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Genotoxicity; Glucose; Lactic acid bacteria; Moringa oleifera powder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29636032 PMCID: PMC5894151 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-018-2180-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Micronucleus test of Control Group with and without Moringa oleifera. a Control Group, water. b M. oleifera Group, 100 mg. c M. oleifera Group, 250 mg. d M. oleifera Group, 500 mg. No significant changes was observed in all smears between control Group and M. oleifera treatment
MNE, MNPCE and PCE frequencies (%)
| Control Group ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose (mg) | MNE | MNPCE | PCE | MNE | MNPCE | PCE |
| 100 | 64.0 ± 23.02 | 0.8 ± 0.44 | 22.2 ± 2.68 | 94.0 ± 45.60 | 0.8 ± 0.83 | 25.8 ± 11.18 |
| *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | |
| *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | |
| 250 | 58.0 ± 40.86 | 0.40 ± 0.54 | 32.2.0 ± 20.8 | 38.0 ± 17.16 | 0.20 ± 0.44 | 22.8 ± 22.83 |
| *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | |
| *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | |
| 500 | 66.0 ± 27.01 | 1.2 ± 1.30 | 23.8 ± 2.48 | 110 ± 81.85 | 1.2 ± 1.09 | 29.4 ± 4.76 |
| *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | |
| *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | *NS | |
*NS not statistically significant
Fig. 2Control group with Moringa oleifera treatment. a Normal architecture of the large intestine. b Normal gastroesophageal union was observed. c No changes in small intestine
Fig. 3Weight (g/kg) of study groups during 8 weeks. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation per group
Fig. 4Glucose values (mg/dL) in study groups during experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± error standard per group