| Literature DB >> 29636002 |
Mari Hayashi1, Naoko Crofts1, Naoko F Oitome1, Naoko Fujita2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Starch is the major component of cereal grains and is composed of essentially linear amylose and highly branched amylopectin. The properties and composition of starch determine the use and value of grains and their products. Starch synthase (SS) I, SSIIa, and SSIIIa play central roles in amylopectin biosynthesis. These three SS isozymes also affect seed development, as complete loss of both SSI and SSIIIa under reduced SSIIa activity in rice lead to sterility, whereas presence of minimal SSI or SSIIIa activity is sufficient for generating fertile seeds. SSs, branching enzymes, and/or debranching enzymes form protein complexes in cereal. However, the relationship between starch properties and the formation of protein complexes remain largely unknown. To better understand this phenomenon, properties of starch and protein complex formation were analyzed using developing mutant rice seeds (ss1 L /ss2a L /ss3a) in which all three major SS activities were reduced.Entities:
Keywords: Amylopectin; Amylose; Protein complexes; Rice (Oryza sativa); Starch synthase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29636002 PMCID: PMC5894220 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1270-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Zymograms of soluble starch biosynthetic enzyme activities. Native-PAGE/activity staining of starch synthases (SSs; Panel a), branching enzymes (BEs; Panel b), and debranching enzymes (DBEs; Panel c) using developing endosperm of double mutant, parental mutant, and wild-type lines. Black arrowheads and brackets indicate SSI, SSIIIa, BEI, BEIIa, BEIIb, ISA (isoamylase), PUL (pullulanase), and Pho1 (phosphorylase) activity bands. Gray arrowheads in A indicate glycosyl hydrolase or transferase activities. Soluble protein extracts were prepared from developing endosperm at 12 days after flowering. The volumes of crude extract applied to the native gels in section ‘a’ were 2-fold and 4-fold greater than those applied in sections ‘b’ and ‘c’, respectively
Starch synthase and AGPase activity in developing seeds (10–15 days after flowering) of double mutants, their parental lines, and wild-type
| Starch synthase | AGPase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Line | μmol min−1 endosperm-1 a | μmol min− 1 endosperm-1, a | ||
| + Citrate | + Citrate | - Citrate | ||
| 11.09 ± 1.2 | 2.22 ± 0 | 1.17 ± 0 | 0.259 ± 0.020 ** | |
|
| 5.28 ± 0.1 | N.D. | 1.04 ± 0.2 | 0.245 ± 0.014** |
|
| 13.23 ± 0.5 | 5.36 ± 0.1 | 1.62 ± 0.1 | 0.324 ± 0.006*, ** |
|
| 6.67 ± 0.6 | N.D. | 0.76 ± 0.4 | 0.506 ± 0.031* |
ND, Not detected
aMean ± SE. n = 3 for all lines
b, c, d, ePercentage of wild-type, Nipponbare
*Significant differences between Nipponbare and mutant lines by the t-test at P < 0.05
**Significant differences between double mutant line and the other lines by the t-test at P < 0.05
Fig. 2Enzyme distributions in protein fractions from developing endosperm. Immuno-blotting of total protein extract, the soluble protein fraction, the loosely bound protein fraction, and the tightly bound protein fraction from developing endosperm at 12 days after flowering using the indicated antibodies
Fig. 3Molecular weight distributions of SS isozymes from developing rice endosperm determined by gel filtration chromatography. Soluble proteins were separated by gel filtration chromatography. Fractions were denatured and separated by SDS-PAGE, and immuno-blotting was performed using the indicated antibodies
Fig. 4SS activities were visualized by non-denaturing zymograms using rice starch biosynthetic enzymes separated by gel filtration chromatography. Black arrowheads show the activities of the indicated SS isozymes. Gray arrowheads represent glycosyl hydrolase or glucan transferase activities. White arrowheads are SS activity bands found only in ss3a
Fig. 5Analyses of protein-protein interactions between rice starch biosynthetic isozymes by co-immunoprecipitation. Immuno-precipitation experiments were performed using the isozyme specific antibodies indicated above and the soluble protein extract from wild-type, ss1/ss2a/SS3a, SS1/ss2a/ss3a and ss1/ss2a/ss3a. Immuno-blotting was performed using the antibodies indicated on the right
Fig. 6Seed morphologies of mutant and wild-type lines. The morphology of mature rice seeds was observed using a stereomicroscope with an overhead light (upper panels) and on a light box (lower panels)
Dehulled grain weight and starch content in mutant rice lines
| Line | Grain weighta per grain (mg) | Starch contentb |
|---|---|---|
|
| 20.3 ± 0.2** | 15.1 ± 1.1** |
|
| 20.2 ± 0.2** | 11.8 ± 0.5** |
|
| 18.8 ± 0.2*,** | 10.2 ± 0.8* |
|
| 18.0 ± 0.2* | 9.9 ± 0.4* |
aMean ± SE of 50 seeds
bMean ± SE of three seeds
cPercentage of the wild-type
dPercentage of grain weight
*Significant differences between Nipponbare and mutant lines by the t-test at P < 0.05
**Significant differences between double mutant line and the other lines by the t-test at P < 0.05
Composition of carbohydrate (weight %) in endosperm starch fractions separated by gel filtration chromatography
| Fr. I (%)a | Fr. II (%) | Fr. III (%) | III/II | Apparent amylose content (%)e | Apparent amylose content (mg/grain)f | True amylose content (%)h | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Line | 2009 | 2013 | 2009 | 2013 | 2009 | 2013 | 2009 | 2013 | ||||
|
| Starchb | 20.3 ± 0.4d | 18.8 ± 0.5 | 20.4 ± 0.2 | 22.5 ± 0.4 | 59.2 ± 0.5 | 58.7 ± 0.4 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 18.8 | 2.84 (100)g | 17.1 |
| Amylopectinc | – | 1.7 ± 0.3 | – | 21.5 ± 0.7 | – | 57.7 ± 1.0 | – | 2.7 ± 0.1 | ||||
|
| Starch | No data | 21.5 ± 0.6 *, ** | No data | 21.2 ± 0.8 ** | No data | 57.3 ± 0.5 ** | No data | 2.7 ± 0.1 ** | 21.5 | 2.54 (89) g | 19.9 |
| Amylopectin | – | 1.6 ± 0.1 ** | – | 20.9 ± 0.6 *, ** | – | 57.2 ± 0.5 ** | – | 2.7 ± 0.1 ** | ||||
|
| Starch | 29.8 ± 0.2 *, ** | 29.4 ± 0.6 * | 13.0 ± 0.2 * | 13.0 ± 0.3 *, ** | 57.2 ± 0.4 *, ** | 57.7 ± 0.3 ** | 4.4 ± 0.1 *, ** | 4.5 ± 0.1 *, ** | 29.4 | 3.00 (106) g | 27.4 |
| Amylopectin | – | 2.0 ± 0.1 *, ** | – | 12.8 ± 0.5 * | – | 56.4 ± 0.7 | – | 4.4 ± 0.1 *, ** | ||||
|
| Starch | 34.0 ± 0.9 * | 30.3 ± 0.3 * | 13.8 ± 0.6 * | 14.8 ± 0.5 * | 52.2 ± 0.4 * | 54.9 ± 0.4 * | 3.8 ± 0.1 * | 3.7 ± 0.1 * | 30.3 | 3.00 (106) g | 27.1 |
| Amylopectin | – | 3.2 ± 0.2 * | – | 14.2 ± 0.6 * | – | 54.5 ± 0.3 * | – | 3.8 ± 0.2 * | ||||
aThree fractions (Fr. I, II, and III) were divided at troughs of the carbohydrate content curve, as detected by refractive index detectors (Fig. 5)
bTotal carbohydrate content = 100%
cAreas of Fr. II and Fr. III of amylopectin were superimposed onto those of the starch, and the amount of amylopectin (extra-long chain) in Fr. I was calculated
dMean ± SE of three replicates
eApparent amylose content (%) = Fr. I of starch in 2013
fApparent amylose content (mg/grain) = (starch content (mg/grain) in Table 2) x (Apparent amylose content (%) in 2013, Table 3)
gPercentage of the wild-type
hTrue amylose content (%) = apparent amylose content (Fr. I of starch in 2013) – extra-long chains (Fr. I of amylopectin in 2013)
*Significant differences between Nipponbare and mutant lines by the t-test at P < 0.05
**Significant differences between double mutant line and the other lines by the t-test at P < 0.05
Fig. 7Schematics of speculated starch biosynthetic protein complexes in wild-type (SS1/ss2a/SS3a), ss1/ss2a/SS3a, SS1/ss2a/ss3a and ss1/ss2a/ss3a. Selected combinations of predicted protein-protein complexes in developing seed of japonica rice (SS1/ss2a/SS3a) [23] are shown as wild-type (a). Alterations of protein complexes in ss1/ss2a/SS3a (b), SS1/ss2a/ss3a (c) and ss1/ss2a/ss3a (d) are illustrated. Boxes indicate an altered protein complex. SS isozymes that were missing or reduced compared with wild-type are indicated in gray. Newly recruited speculated SS isozymes are indicated with a bold oval. Black arrows indicate a reduced molecular weight due to missing enzymes. Gray arrows indicate recruitment of enzymes. Note that all lines used in this study have low SSIIa activity