Laura J Henze1, Niklas J Koehl1, Joseph P O'Shea1, Edmund S Kostewicz2, René Holm3, Brendan T Griffin1. 1. School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 2. Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 3. Drug Product Development, Janssen Research and Development, Johnson & Johnson, Beerse, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In pharmaceutical drug development, preclinical tests in animal models are essential to demonstrate whether the new drug is orally bioavailable and to gain a first insight into in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters that can subsequently be used to predict human values. Despite significant advances in the development of bio-predictive in vitro models and increasing ethical expectations for reducing the number of animals used for research purposes, there is still a need for appropriately selected pre-clinical in vivo testing to provide guidance on the decision to progress to testing in humans. The selection of the appropriate animal models is essential both to maximise the learning that can be obtained from such experiments and to avoid unnecessary testing in a range of species. KEY FINDINGS: The present review, provides an insight into the suitability of the pig model for predicting oral bioavailability in humans, by comparing the conditions in the GIT. It also contains a comparison between the bioavailability of compounds dosed to both humans and pigs, to provide an insight into the relative correlation and examples on why a lack of correlation may be observed. SUMMARY: While there is a general trend towards predicting human bioavailability from pig data, there is considerable variability in the data set, most likely reflecting species specific differences in individual drug metabolism. Nonetheless, the correlation between pigs vs. humans was comparable to that reported for dogs vs. humans. The presented data demonstrate the suitability of the pig as a preclinical model to predict bioavailability in human.
OBJECTIVES: In pharmaceutical drug development, preclinical tests in animal models are essential to demonstrate whether the new drug is orally bioavailable and to gain a first insight into in vivo pharmacokinetic parameters that can subsequently be used to predict human values. Despite significant advances in the development of bio-predictive in vitro models and increasing ethical expectations for reducing the number of animals used for research purposes, there is still a need for appropriately selected pre-clinical in vivo testing to provide guidance on the decision to progress to testing in humans. The selection of the appropriate animal models is essential both to maximise the learning that can be obtained from such experiments and to avoid unnecessary testing in a range of species. KEY FINDINGS: The present review, provides an insight into the suitability of the pig model for predicting oral bioavailability in humans, by comparing the conditions in the GIT. It also contains a comparison between the bioavailability of compounds dosed to both humans and pigs, to provide an insight into the relative correlation and examples on why a lack of correlation may be observed. SUMMARY: While there is a general trend towards predicting human bioavailability from pig data, there is considerable variability in the data set, most likely reflecting species specific differences in individual drug metabolism. Nonetheless, the correlation between pigs vs. humans was comparable to that reported for dogs vs. humans. The presented data demonstrate the suitability of the pig as a preclinical model to predict bioavailability in human.
Authors: Mark McAllister; Talia Flanagan; Susan Cole; Andreas Abend; Evangelos Kotzagiorgis; Jobst Limberg; Heather Mead; Victor Mangas-Sanjuan; Paul A Dickinson; Andrea Moir; Xavier Pepin; Diansong Zhou; Christophe Tistaert; Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Om Anand; Maxime Le Merdy; David B Turner; Brendan T Griffin; Adam Darwich; Jennifer Dressman; Claire Mackie Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-05-07 Impact factor: 6.525
Authors: Miriam Ayuso; Laura Buyssens; Marina Stroe; Allan Valenzuela; Karel Allegaert; Anne Smits; Pieter Annaert; Antonius Mulder; Sebastien Carpentier; Chris Van Ginneken; Steven Van Cruchten Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Hiroko Enomoto; James Yeatts; Liliana Carbajal; B Radha Krishnan; Jay P Madan; Sandeep Laumas; Anthony T Blikslager; Kristen M Messenger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-04-12 Impact factor: 3.240