Literature DB >> 29635161

Phase of beta-frequency tACS over primary motor cortex modulates corticospinal excitability.

Lukas Schilberg1, Tahnée Engelen2, Sanne Ten Oever2, Teresa Schuhmann2, Beatrice de Gelder2, Tom A de Graaf2, Alexander T Sack3.   

Abstract

The assessment of corticospinal excitability by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor evoked potentials is an established diagnostic tool in neurophysiology and a widely used procedure in fundamental brain research. However, concern about low reliability of these measures has grown recently. One possible cause of high variability of MEPs under identical acquisition conditions could be the influence of oscillatory neuronal activity on corticospinal excitability. Based on research showing that transcranial alternating current stimulation can entrain neuronal oscillations we here test whether alpha or beta frequency tACS can influence corticospinal excitability in a phase-dependent manner. We applied tACS at individually calibrated alpha- and beta-band oscillation frequencies, or we applied sham tACS. Simultaneous single TMS pulses time locked to eight equidistant phases of the ongoing tACS signal evoked MEPs. To evaluate offline effects of stimulation frequency, MEP amplitudes were measured before and after tACS. To evaluate whether tACS influences MEP amplitude, we fitted one-cycle sinusoids to the average MEPs elicited at the different phase conditions of each tACS frequency. We found no frequency-specific offline effects of tACS. However, beta-frequency tACS modulation of MEPs was phase-dependent. Post hoc analyses suggested that this effect was specific to participants with low (<19 Hz) intrinsic beta frequency. In conclusion, by showing that beta tACS influences MEP amplitude in a phase-dependent manner, our results support a potential role attributed to neuronal oscillations in regulating corticospinal excitability. Moreover, our findings may be useful for the development of TMS protocols that improve the reliability of MEPs as a meaningful tool for research applications or for clinical monitoring and diagnosis.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticospinal excitability; Motor evoked potentials; Neuronal oscillations; Transcranial alternating current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29635161     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Common Rhythm of Action and Perception.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Maria Concetta Morrone; Alice Tomassini
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Repetitive Passive Finger Movement Modulates Primary Somatosensory Cortex Excitability.

Authors:  Ryoki Sasaki; Shota Tsuiki; Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Kei Saito; Yasuto Inukai; Naofumi Otsuru; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Intrinsic 40Hz-phase asymmetries predict tACS effects during conscious auditory perception.

Authors:  Jan Meier; Guido Nolte; Till R Schneider; Andreas K Engel; Gregor Leicht; Christoph Mulert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Probing the Link Between Perception and Oscillations: Lessons from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Yuranny Cabral-Calderin; Melanie Wilke
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Online and offline effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Ivan Pozdniakov; Alicia Nunez Vorobiova; Giulia Galli; Simone Rossi; Matteo Feurra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A specific phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation at the β frequency boosts repetitive paired-pulse TMS-induced plasticity.

Authors:  Hisato Nakazono; Katsuya Ogata; Akinori Takeda; Emi Yamada; Shinichiro Oka; Shozo Tobimatsu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Does alpha phase modulate visual target detection? Three experiments with tACS-phase-based stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Tom A de Graaf; Alix Thomson; Shanice E W Janssens; Sander van Bree; Sanne Ten Oever; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Phase-dependent amplification of working memory content and performance.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Peter De Weerd; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Concurrent human TMS-EEG-fMRI enables monitoring of oscillatory brain state-dependent gating of cortico-subcortical network activity.

Authors:  Judith C Peters; Joel Reithler; Tom A de Graaf; Teresa Schuhmann; Rainer Goebel; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-01-22

10.  No aftereffects of high current density 10 Hz and 20 Hz tACS on sensorimotor alpha and beta oscillations.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Lafleur; Audrey Murray; Manon Desforges; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Felipe Fregni; Sara Tremblay; Dave Saint-Amour; Jean-François Lepage; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.