Literature DB >> 29634494

Assessment of fluid responsiveness: recent advances.

Xavier Monnet1, Jean-Louis Teboul2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the field of prediction of fluid responsiveness, the most recent studies have focused on validating new tests, on clarifying the limitations of older ones, and better defining their modalities. RECENT
FINDINGS: The limitations of pulse pressure/stroke volume variations are numerous, but recent efforts have been made to overcome these limitations, like in case of low tidal volume ventilation. Following pulse pressure/stroke volume variations, new tests have emerged which assess preload responsiveness by challenging cardiac preload through heart-lung interactions, like during recruitment manoeuvres and end-expiratory/inspiratory occlusions. Given the risk of fluid overload that is inherent to the 'classical' fluid challenge, a 'mini' fluid challenge, made of 100 ml of fluid only, has been developed and investigated in recent studies. The reliability of the passive leg raising test is now well established and the newest publications have mainly aimed at defining several noninvasive estimates of cardiac output that can be monitored to assess its effects.
SUMMARY: Research in this field is still very active, such that several indices and tests of fluid responsiveness are now available. They may contribute to reduce excessive fluid balance by avoiding unnecessary fluid administration and, also, by ensuring safe fluid removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29634494     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  12 in total

1.  The use of pulse pressure variation for predicting impairment of microcirculatory blood flow.

Authors:  Christoph R Behem; Michael F Graessler; Till Friedheim; Rahel Kluttig; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Anna Duprée; E Sebastian Debus; Daniel A Reuter; Sabine H Wipper; Constantin J C Trepte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Invasive arterial pressure monitoring: much more than mean arterial pressure!

Authors:  Glenn Hernandez; Antonio Messina; Eduardo Kattan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 41.787

3.  Effect of a tailored sepsis treatment protocol on patient outcomes in the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia: results of an interrupted time series analysis.

Authors:  Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie; Lemlem Beza; Finot Debebe; Andualem Wubetie; Kathleen Gamble; Gerald Lebovic; Sharon E Straus; Tigist Zewdu; Aklilu Azazh; Cheryl Hunchak; Megan Landes; Dawit Kebebe Huluka
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 7.960

4.  Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position.

Authors:  Rui Shi; Soufia Ayed; Francesca Moretto; Danila Azzolina; Nello De Vita; Francesco Gavelli; Simone Carelli; Arthur Pavot; Christopher Lai; Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.334

5.  Hypoxia-related parameters during septic shock resuscitation: Pathophysiological determinants and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Nicolás Pavez; Eduardo Kattan; Magdalena Vera; Giorgio Ferri; Emilio Daniel Valenzuela; Leyla Alegría; Sebastian Bravo; Ronald Pairumani; César Santis; Vanessa Oviedo; Dagoberto Soto; Gustavo Ospina-Tascón; Jan Bakker; Glenn Hernández; Ricardo Castro
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 6.  Approach of minimal invasive monitoring and initial treatment of the septic patient in emergency medicine.

Authors:  German Devia Jaramillo; Jenny Castro Canoa; Emiro Valverde Galván
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-20

7.  USER Protocol as a Guide to Resuscitation of the Patient with Septic Shock in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  German Devia Jaramillo; Salvador Menendez Ramirez
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-12

8.  Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Cecilia Loudet; Vanina S Kanoore Edul; Javier Osatnik; Fernando Ríos; Daniela Vásquez; Mario Pozo; Bernardo Lattanzio; Fernando Pálizas; Francisco Klein; Damián Piezny; Paolo N Rubatto Birri; Graciela Tuhay; Analía García; Analía Santamaría; Graciela Zakalik; Cecilia González; Elisa Estenssoro
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 9.  Optimal target in septic shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Eduardo Kattan; Ricardo Castro; Magdalena Vera; Glenn Hernández
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

10.  Changes in central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension induced by fluid bolus in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Charalampos Pierrakos; David De Bels; Thomas Nguyen; Dimitrios Velissaris; Rachid Attou; Jacques Devriendt; Patrick M Honore; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Daniel De Backer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.