Literature DB >> 29634441

Renal Allograft Dysfunction: Evaluation with Shear-wave Sonoelastography.

Nitin P Ghonge1, Mohita Mohan1, Vikas Kashyap1, Sanjiv Jasuja1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate whether shear-wave sonoelastography can help differentiate stable renal allograft from acute allograft dysfunction and chronic allograft dysfunction and to correlate shear-wave sonoelastography measurements with resistive index (RI), serum creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) obtained with the Nankivell equation, and biopsy findings. Materials and Methods A prospective study of 60 patients who had undergone renal transplantation was conducted between October 2014 and March 2016. Patients were classified as having stable allograft, acute allograft dysfunction, or chronic allograft dysfunction on the basis of clinical parameters. Mean parenchymal stiffness was compared. The Banff score was used wherever applicable. Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to evaluate the feasibility of differentiation. Results Thirty patients had graft dysfunction (acute in 19 patients and chronic in 11). Mean parenchymal stiffness values in stable allograft, acute allograft dysfunction, and chronic allograft dysfunction were 8.51 kPa ± 2.44, 11.06 kPa ± 2.91, and 24.50 kPa ± 4.49, respectively (stable vs acute dysfunction, P = .010; stable vs chronic dysfunction, P < .001; acute sysfunction vs chronic dysfunction, P < .001). The allograft parenchymal stiffness values for patients with Banff grade I (mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) differed significantly from those with Banff grade II (moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy) (P = .02). Parenchymal stiffness showed a negative correlation with eGFR (r = -0.725; P < .001) and a positive correlation with RI (r = 0.562; P < .001) and serum creatinine level (r = 0.714; P < .001). The sensitivity was 73.68% and specificity was 80% in the differentiation of stable graft from acute graft dysfunction (threshold value, 10.11 kPa). Conclusion Shear-wave sonoelastographic evaluation of renal parenchymal stiffness may help differentiate stable allograft from acute and chronic allograft dysfunction. The inverse correlation of parenchymal stiffness with eGFR and positive correlation with RI and serum creatinine level show that shear-wave sonoelastography may reflect functional status of the renal allograft. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29634441     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018170577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Point Shear Wave Elastography Using Machine Learning to Differentiate Renal Cell Carcinoma and Angiomyolipoma.

Authors:  Hersh Sagreiya; Alireza Akhbardeh; Dandan Li; Rosa Sigrist; Benjamin I Chung; Geoffrey A Sonn; Lu Tian; Daniel L Rubin; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Technical feasibility and correlations between shear-wave elastography and histology in kidney fibrosis in children.

Authors:  Catherine Desvignes; Alexia Dabadie; Audrey Aschero; Alix Ruocco; Florentine Garaix; Laurent Daniel; Sophie Ferlicot; Virginie Villes; Anderson D Loundou; Guillaume Gorincour; Philippe Petit
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-24

Review 3.  Novel Uses of Ultrasound to Assess Kidney Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Andrew D Rule; Thomas D Atwell; Shigao Chen
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-07-01

4.  Magnetic resonance elastography vs. point shear wave ultrasound elastography for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Sonja Gordic; Mark Berger; Veronica Delaney; Fadi Salem; Sara Lewis; Madhav Menon; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 5.  Renal Allograft Rejection: Noninvasive Ultrasound- and MRI-Based Diagnostics.

Authors:  Ulrich Jehn; Katharina Schuette-Nuetgen; Dominik Kentrup; Verena Hoerr; Stefan Reuter
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Correlation between Kidney Function and Sonographic Texture Features after Allograft Transplantation with Corresponding to Serum Creatinine: A Long Term Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Abbasian Ardakani A; Sattar A R; Abolghasemi J; Mohammadi A
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Shear wave elastography and Doppler ultrasound in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Luana Marinho Gonçalves; Gabriele Carra Forte; Tiago Garcia Holz; Lucas Lobraico Libermann; Carlos Eduardo Poli de Figueiredo; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Renal transplant evaluation: multimodality imaging of post-transplant complications.

Authors:  Nitin P Ghonge; Nidhi Goyal; Sandeep Vohra; Veena Chowdhury
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Shear-Wave Elastography Variability Analysis and Relation with Kidney Allograft Dysfunction: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Sorana D Bolboacă; Florin Ioan Elec; Alina Daciana Elec; Adriana Milena Muntean; Mihai Adrian Socaciu; Gheorghita Iacob; Răzvan Zaro; Alexandra-Ioana Andrieș; Ramona Maria Bădulescu; Radu Mihai Ignat; Mihaela Iancu; Radu Ion Badea
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-13

10.  Noninvasive Assessment of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy in Renal Transplant by Combining Point-Shear Wave Elastography and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.

Authors:  Chi Qin; Hailong Jin; Haixiang Zhang; Yun Zhang; Zhaojie Guan; Yongyan Gao
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.