Literature DB >> 29633630

Authors' reply: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).

Moonseong Heo1, Paul Meissner2, Alain H Litwin3, M Diane McKee2, Alison Karasz2, Earle C Chambers2, Ming-Chin Yeh4, Judith Wylie-Rosett1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29633630      PMCID： PMC6868521          DOI： 10.1177/0962280218767707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN： 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect.

Authors:  Moonseong Heo; Paul Meissner; Alain H Litwin; Julia H Arnsten; M Diane McKee; Alison Karasz; Paula McKinley; Colin D Rehm; Earle C Chambers; Ming-Chin Yeh; Judith Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  A new preference-based analysis for randomized trials can estimate treatment acceptability and effect in compliant patients.

Authors:  S D Walter; Gordon Guyatt; Victor M Montori; R Cook; K Prasad
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 6.437
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.