Mehrafarin Fesharaki1, Shahnaz Razavi2, Laleh Ghasemi-Mobarakeh3, Mohaddeseh Behjati4, Reyhaneh Yarahmadian5, Mohammad Kazemi6, Hossein Hejazi7. 1. Department of Cell Sciences Research Center Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Electronic address: Fesharaki@med.mui.ac.ir. 2. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Medicine School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 3. Department of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran. Electronic address: laleh.ghasemi@cc.iut.ac.ir. 4. Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. 6. Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 7. Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
So far, the only way to replace disease or injury-induced
loss of neural tissue has been through cell transplantation.
Neural tissue engineering is continuously been applied as a
new choice for nervous system repair and regeneration and is
composed of a biomaterial-based substrate that incorporates
cells and biochemical cues (1-4).Neural progenitor cells are the important and vital
components of any strategy that is employed to replace
neural tissue. Long-term neural integration, regeneration and
renovation require a successive supply of neural progenitor
cells to be able to differentiate into neurons and glial cells (5).
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are found in virtually all
organs of the body and have self-renewal ability and multi-
lineage capacity to differentiate into different tissue cells such
as bone, cartilage, muscle, adipocytes and neural progenitors
(6, 7).Bone marrow-derived MSCs were find first, and considered
the primary source of MSCs for clinical use. Subsequently,
MSCs were isolated from various other sources such as adipose
tissue, serving as one of the alternatives to bone marrow as it
is safer and easier to use as compared to bone marrow-derived
MSCs and share many biological characteristics (7).Recently, interest has rapidly grown in the developmentalplasticity and therapeutic potential of these cells (8-11).
Previous studies showed that the human scalp tissue containsmultipotent stem cells with the capacity to differentiate alongmesodermal and ectodermal lineages (12). Adipose tissueof scalp originates from neural crest and previous studiesdemonstrated that stem cells with neural crest origin canbetter differentiate to neural linage. In this regard, Shih et al.
(12) showed ectodermal neurogenic differentiation potential
of stem cells available in scalp tissue.Tissue engineering treatments, using scaffolds and livingcells exploit new advancements in understanding of thedevelopmental and cell biology that controls and directs cellfunction with the eventual aim of human tissue regenerationand repair (13). The cells which especially in current years,
have been used in tissue engineering are stromal stem
cells and a wide range of biomaterials has been used forfabrication of scaffolds. It is expected that scaffolds mimicthe architecture of extracellular matrix (ECM) as much aspossible and provide appropriate microenvironment for cell
growth and differentiation.Recently, nanofibrous scaffolds with the ability to mimicthe native ECM along with their high surface-to-volumeratio, interconnected pores and high porosity have attracted
much interest in tissue engineering (14, 15). The usage ofelectrospinning, an operationally simple, inexpensive andversatile approach has been exponentially increased for
fabrication of nanofibrous scaffolds and has been used to
fabricate bio-composite nanofibers scaffolds to providemechanical support and direct the growth of different cells (1618).
Prabhakarn et al. (18) showed neuronal differentiation ofhuman bone marrow derived MSCs on electrospun poly(llactic
acid)-co-poly-(ε-caprolactone)/Collagen (PLCL/Coll)
nanofibrous scaffolds.Poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) is a semi crystalline linearhydrophobic polymer. Although, the electrospun PCL
nanofibrous scaffolds mimic the dimension of ECM in
living tissues, its hydrophobic nature reduces the ability ofcell adhesion, migration, proliferation and differentiation,
necessary for tissue differentiation. Our previous studyshowed that incorporation of gelatin into PCL nanofibrousscaffolds increases the hydrophilicity of scaffolds leading tohigher rates of cell attachment and proliferation on resultant
nanofibrous scaffolds (19).Moreover, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is described as
plasma with the platelet population of >1.0×106 cells/µl thatcontains various growth factors such as trans forming growthfactor (TGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), plateletsderived-epidermal growth factor (PDEGF), platelet-derivedangiogenesis factor (PDAF), insulin growth factor -1 (IGF1)
and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). PRP canbe considered an autologous healing biomaterial and appliedto accelerate cell proliferation and matrix synthesis in tissueengineering. Moreover, its availability, cost-effectiveness,
wide range of applications, and autologous feature make it
suitable for several clinical applications (20-24).The purpose of the present study was to isolate and culture
scalp adipose-derived MSCs (SADS cells), evaluate their
neurogenic capacity and also discuss the possibility of
application of SADS cells in nerve tissue engineering, as apreliminary study. During this study, nanofibrous scaffoldswere coated with PRP to examine the effect of PRP on cell
proliferation and morphology.
Materials and Methods
Cell isolation and culture
In this experimental study, scalp adipose tissue was obtainedfrom healthy volunteers under local anesthesia. Biopsies of 5×5 mm2 were obtained from healthy scalp, and transferred tocell culture laboratory in phosphate-buffered saline solution
(PBS).The fragments were washed extensively by sterile PBS atleast three times. Subcutaneous fat was manually removedwith eye scissors. The remaining tissue, was again washedwith PBS, cut into 1×1 m pieces and then cultivated intissue culture medium including DMEM/F12 and modifiedEagle’s medium (Gibco BRL, Paisley, UK) containing 12%
fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, UK), 1% streptomycin/
penicillin solution (CM Media, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), andincubated in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2 and
defined as passage 0 (P0).Culture media was replaced every 3 days until 80%
confluency was obtained. Then, cells were split using 0.05%
trypsin/0.02% EDTA and sub-cultured for more passages.
This process was repeated until passage 3 and cells wereused in the present study (all chemicals were obtained fromSigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, unless stated otherwise). Allexperimental procedures were approved by the Scientific andEthics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Science,
Isfahan, Iran.
Flow cytometry
After passage three of culture, the expression of surface
markers was evaluated using Monoclonal antibodies
including CD44, CD90, CD105 and CD45 antibodies (BD/
Pharmingen, San Diego, CA).The adherent cells were detached, and re-suspended inPBS. Aliquots containing 5×105 cells were incubated with
primary antibodies for 15 minute at 4-8°C. Finally, the cellswere analyzed using a FACS Calibur cytometer (Becton
Dickinson). For each sample, 1×104 events were acquired and
studied by the CELLQUEST Pro software. All events wereobtained under similar conditions and cellular debris were
removed from analysis. Expression of cell surface marker
was analyzed by isotype control on a histogram plot.
Neurogenic differentiation
SADS cells were detached using trypsin-EDTA and
cultured in DMEM/F12 modified Eagle’s medium
supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin/
antimycotic, 5 µg/mL insulin, 200 µM indomethacin and
0.5 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis).
This media was labeled as NM hereafter. The media was
replaced every 3 days with fresh media. Ashjian et al. (25)
also used isobutylmethylxanthine, indomethacin, and insulin
for differentiation of human processed lipoaspirate into early
neural progenitors.
RNA isolation and quantitative real-time polymerase
chain reaction
Total RNAwas isolated by RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, USA),
and treated with RNase free DNase set (Qiagen, USA) toeliminate the genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’sinstructions. The RNA was reverse transcribed usingRevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentase,
USA) with oligo dT primers. The real-time polymerase chainreaction (RT-PCR) was carried out using Maxima SYBRGreen RoxqPCR master mix kit (Fermentase, USA) andStepOne Plus™ quantitative Real time PCR detection System(Applied Biosystems, USA). PCR reactions were performedat a total volume of 20 µl. The PCR amplification conditionsconsisted of 10 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 cycles ofdenaturation step at 95°C for 15 seconds and annealing andextension for 1 minute at 60°C. The relative quantification(RQ) was calculated as the ratio of the mean value of the target
gene to the mean value of the reference gene (GAPDH) in
each sample. The relative amount of PCR products generated
from each primer set, was determined on the basis of the cycle
threshold (Ct) value. The RQ was calculated by 2-ΔΔCT. These
experiments were carried out in triplicate and independently
repeated at least three times. Same method was applied for
investigation of cells differentiation on scaffolds.
Preparation of platelet-rich plasma
In this study, PRP was prepared according to method
describe by Sell et al. (26). Briefly, 40 mL whole blood was
obtained from Iran blood transfusion organization and added
to tubes containing acid citrate- dextrose as an anti-coagulant
(0.163 mL per 1 mL of blood) immediately after being drawn;
blood was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes to separate
the plasma containing the platelets from the red blood cells.
The collected supernatant was centrifuged again at 3000 rpm
for 10 minutes, and precipitated platelets were collected. The
platelets were re-suspended in a proper volume of plasma
to achieve a platelet concentration 8-10 times above the
physiologic amounts.
Preparation of nanofibrous scaffolds
The polymer solution of PCL and PCL/gelatin (70:30)
at concentrations of 11% (w/v) wt% and 6% (w/v) were
prepared by dissolving PCL and PCL/gelatin in dimethyl
formamide/methylene chloride (80:20 v/v) and hexafloro-2propanol,
respectively and then stirred for 24 hours at room
temperature. The solution was electrospun from a 5 mL
syringe with a needle diameter of 0.4 mm at a mass flow rate
of 1 mL/hour. A high voltage was applied to tip of the needle
attached to the syringe when a fluid jet was ejected. PCL and
PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds were also coated with PRP
by soaking samples in PRP, overnight.Before cell seeding, scaffolds were exposed to UV radiation
for 2 hours, washed 3 times with PBS for 20 minutes each and
incubated with culture media for 12 hours. PCL, PCL/gelatin,
PCL/PRP and PCL/gelatin/PRP nanofibrous scaffolds were
placed in a 24-well plate and SADS cells were further seeded
on scaffolds at a density of 1×104 cells/well with NM at 37°C,
with 5% CO2 and 95% humidity.
In vitro cell culture study
The morphology of SADS cells differentiated to nervecells on PCL, PCL/PRP, PCL/gelatin, PCL/gelatin/PRP wasobserved by SEM. After 7 days of cells seeding, sampleswere fixed using 3% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis) for 2 hours. Specimens were rinsed with water anddehydrated using graded concentrations (50, 70, 90, and 100v/v) of ethanol. Subsequently, the samples were treated withhexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) (Fluka) and air-dried under afume hood. Finally, the samples were coated with gold for
the observation of cell morphology. The cell proliferation on
different substrates was determined using the colorimetric
MTT assay. After 7 days of cells seeding in 24-well plate,
cells were washed with PBS and then media were replacedwith a basal medium containing 0.005% MTT solution. After4-hour incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2, the medium was
discarded and the precipitated formazan was dissolved indimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The plate was incubated for 30minutes and aliquots were pipetted in to a 96-well plate. Theabsorbance of each well was detected by a Micro plate reader
(Hyperion MPR 4, Germany) at the wavelength of 540 nm.RNA isolation and quantitative real-time RT-PCR were also
carried out for seeded cells on different scaffolds according to
the aforementioned method (section 2.4). For RT-PCR, cells
were seeded on scaffolds at a density of 2×105 cells/well as
more cells were needed for RT-PCR.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis
was carried out using single-factor analysis of variance
(ANOVA). A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Isolation, characterization and differentiation of
SADS cells
In this study, human scalp adipose stem cells (SADS cells)
were isolated from human scalp adipose tissue. SADS cells
similar to processed lipoaspirate (PLA) cells, were expanded
easily in vitro and exhibited a fibroblast-like morphology.In order to characterize the SADS cells, cell surface marker
expression of isolated SADS cells at the third passage was
analyzed. Flow cytometric analysis showed that human
SADS cells do not express CD34 and CD45 but express
CD90 (98.76%), CD44 (66.61%) and CD105 (97.18%)
revealing adipose tissue nature of these cells (Fig .1).
Fig.1
Flow cytometric analysis of SADS cells shows that human SADS cells express CD44, CD90 and CD105 but not CD34 and CD45.
Human SADS cells were induced to differentiate in
culture by incubation with NM. As early as day 2 (from
day 2 to day 7) of neural induction, morphologic changes
were noted. Specifically, the morphology of SADS cells
changed from flat, elongated and spindle-shaped cells
to rounded cells with several branching extensions and
retractile characteristics (Fig .2).
Fig.2
Morphology of cells cultured in NM after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 days of cell seeding (×40).
Flow cytometric analysis of SADS cells shows that human SADS cells express CD44, CD90 and CD105 but not CD34 and CD45.Morphology of cells cultured in NM after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 days of cell seeding (×40).After 10-day treatment of SADS cells with NM, cells
expressed markers characteristic of neural cells such as
Nestin (NES) and neuron specific nuclear protein (NEUN)
(as early neuronal markers), as well as microtubuleassociated
protein 2 (MAP2) and neuronal microtubuleassociated
(TAU) (as mature neuronal markers) but did
not express matured astrocyte maker (GFAP) (Fig .3).
Fig.3
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of NES,
NEUN, MAP2, TAU and GFAP expression in undifferentiated and neurally
induced SADS cells. *; Significance level set at P<0.05.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of NES,
NEUN, MAP2, TAU and GFAP expression in undifferentiated and neurally
induced SADS cells. *; Significance level set at P<0.05.
Morphology and proliferation of SADS cells on nanofibrous scaffolds
SEM micrograph of PCL and PCL/gelatin nanofibersshowed uniform and bead-free nanofibers (Fig .4). Fiber
diameter was found to be 431 ± 118 nm and 189 ± 56 nm
for PCL and PCL/gelatin nanofibers, respectively. PCL andPCL/gelatin nanofibers were fabricated and characterized inour previous study. More details and information regardingcharacterization of PCL and PCL/gelatin nanofibers (fiberdiameter distribution, porosity, mechanical properties, andbiodegradability) were reported in our previous study (19).
Fig.4
Morphology of PCL and PCL/gelatin nanofibers. Morphology of A.
PCL and B. PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds, and C. MTT results of SADS
cells seeded on PCL, PCL/gelatin, PCL/PRP and PCL/gelatin/PRP after 7
days of cell seeding.
*; Significance set at P<0.05, **; Not significant difference (P>0.05), PCL;
Poly (ε-caprolactone), and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
MTT assay was carried out to evaluate the proliferation
of SADS cells on PCL, PCL/gelatin, PCL/ PRP and PCL/
gelatin/PRP nanofibrous scaffolds after 7 days of cell seeding.
Incorporation of gelatin into the structure of PCL nanofibrous
scaffolds significantly enhanced cell proliferation compared
to PCL nanofibrous scaffolds without gelatin (P<0.05, Fig .4).Coating of scaffolds with PRP was also found to increase
cell proliferation whereas the proliferation of cells on PCL/
PRP and PCL/gelatin/PRP scaffolds was found to be higher
in comparison to PCL and PCL/gelatin alone scaffolds
(P<0.05).Morphology of cells on different scaffolds after 7 days of
cell seeding revealing good integration of cells and scaffolds
(Fig .5). SEM results are also consistent with MTT results
and indicate higher levels of cell spreading and proliferation
on PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds compared to PCL
nanofibrous scaffolds. Moreover more cell spreading and
proliferation was observed on scaffolds coated with PRP
compared to those without PRP.
Fig.5
Morphology of differentiated cells on A. PCL, B. PCL/gel, C. PCL/PRP, and D. PCL/gelatin/PRP after 7 days of cell seeding on scaffold with NM (×1000).
PCL; Poly (ε-caprolactone) and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
Expression of NES, NEUN, MAP2, TAU and GFAP on
different scaffolds revealed differentiation of SADS cells
to neural cells on nanofibrous scaffolds (Fig .6). However,
no significant difference was observed in the expressionof NES, NEUN, MAP2, TAU and GFAP among differentscaffolds (P>0.05) indicating that substrate does not have anysignificant effect on differentiation of cells.
Fig.6
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of NES, NEUN, MAP2, TAU and GFAP expression in undifferentiated and neurally induced SADS
cells seeded on PCL, PCL/PRP, PCL/gelatin, PCL/gelatin/PRP.
*; Significance level set at P<0.05, PCL; Poly (ε-caprolactone), and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
Morphology of PCL and PCL/gelatin nanofibers. Morphology of A.
PCL and B. PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds, and C. MTT results of SADS
cells seeded on PCL, PCL/gelatin, PCL/PRP and PCL/gelatin/PRP after 7
days of cell seeding.*; Significance set at P<0.05, **; Not significant difference (P>0.05), PCL;
Poly (ε-caprolactone), and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.Morphology of differentiated cells on A. PCL, B. PCL/gel, C. PCL/PRP, and D. PCL/gelatin/PRP after 7 days of cell seeding on scaffold with NM (×1000).
PCL; Poly (ε-caprolactone) and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of NES, NEUN, MAP2, TAU and GFAP expression in undifferentiated and neurally induced SADS
cells seeded on PCL, PCL/PRP, PCL/gelatin, PCL/gelatin/PRP.
*; Significance level set at P<0.05, PCL; Poly (ε-caprolactone), and PRP; Platelet-rich plasma.
Discussion
In this study, SADS cells were isolated from human
adipose tissue of scalp; after mincing biopsies, the
specimens were maintained in DMEM/F12 media
supplemented with 12% FBS. We also used the media
containing 10% FBS and did not observe any alteration
in the morphology of cells (data not shown), while a
significant increase in proliferation rate and neurogenic
differentiation capacity were detected following
utilization of 12% FBS.Flow cytometric results showed that isolated SADS cells,
after the third passage were positive for CD44 (66.61%),
CD90 (98.75%) and CD105 (97%) but did not express
CD 34 and CD45. Other researchers have shown that bone
marrow-derived stromal stem cells and adipose-derived
stem cells (ADSCs) have comparable phenotype (27) and
it was also reported by Zuk et al. (28) and Gronthos et al.
(29) that ADSCs and MSCs are phenotypically similar as
both cell populations possess CD44, CD90 and CD 105
surface markers of adipose tissue.Several studies have established the neurogenic
differentiation potential of ADSCs and MSCs. In other
words, lots of studies have shown that adipose stem cells
can differentiate into neural cells in the cell culture media
(25, 30-32). Despite numerous studies done on ADSCs,
no study inspected the probable neurogenic potential
of human SADS cells, to date. Shin et al. (12) showed
that human SADS cells differentiate into neuronal
precursors and they suggested that these cells can be used
as an alternative for neural repairing. To the best of our
knowledge, it is the first research which focused on human
SADS cells and demonstrated that they can differentiate
into neural cells, in vitro. SADS cells are easily obtained,
simply cultured and effortlessly expanded, in vitro. These
cells also harvested in a safe manner with minimal risk
for donors.Ashjian et al. (25) employed induction protocol by
using indomethacin, isobutylmethylxanthine, and insulin
for differentiation of human PLA cells to early neural
progenitors. In our study, we used the same media. They
observed that cells cultured in neural induction media had
an increased expression of NSE and NEUN as early markers
of neurons but did not express mature astrocyte marker
(GFAP), MAP2 or TAU as mature neuronal markers. But,
in this research, we observed that cells cultured in neural
induction media had an increased expression of NES and
NEUN as early markers of neurons and MAP2 and TAU
as mature neuronal markers. However, no expression of
the mature astrocyte marker, GFAP was observed during
this study. Our data suggest that human SADS cells may
have the potential to differentiate into early and mature
progenitor neural cells, in vitro.PCL is a biodegradable polymer that has been used
for tissue engineering applications due to its excellent
mechanical properties, availability, solubility in a wide
range of solvents and ability to blend with different
polymers. However, due to its hydrophobic nature and
lack of functional groups in its structure, the rate of cell
attachment to the surface of PCL scaffolds is low (19, 32).
Gelatin is a natural biopolymer derived from collagen and
formed by breaking the triple-helix structure of collagen
into a single-strand molecule. Moreover, the researchers
found a biochemical interaction between cells and gelatin
exposed to the surface of the nanofibers (17, 32). In our
previous study, we investigated the effect of addition of
gelatin to PCL on properties of final scaffolds and our
results showed that PCL/gelatin at a weight ratio of 70:30, is
suitable substrate for nerve tissue engineering application
in terms of mechanical properties, biodegradation rate
and cell attachment (19).We also applied PCL/gelatin 70:30 nanofibers as nerve
guide in an in vivo model and our findings showed that
PCL/gelatin 70:30 can serve as an appropriate substrate
for peripheral nerve regeneration (33). Based on the
attractive properties of PCL for biomedical applications,
in this study, we modified the surface of PCL nanofibers
by coating them with PRP and compared cell attachment
and proliferation between PCL and PCL/PRP nanofibers.
Moreover, we coated PCL/gelatin 70:30 nanofiber with
PRP to examine the effect of PRP on cell behavior.Our results showed higher proliferation of SADS
cells on scaffolds containing gelatin which is consistent
with previous studies. To date, using of PRP in clinical
applications has attracted more attention tissue repair and
regeneration with very minimal threat to the patient. The
collection of whole blood, the concentration and isolation
of platelets to make PRP and its application in different
forms such as liquid and in lyophilized forms has been
demonstrated to be effective for improving cellular
activity (34-40).Also, PRP contains specific growth factors such as
TGF-ß, PDGF, FGF, VEGF and IGF. In this study, higher
proliferation rates were observed for SADS cells seeded
on the scaffolds coated with PRP which is likely due
to the presence of the above-mentioned growth factors
in the structure of PRP. RT-PCR analysis also showed
differentiation of SADS cells to neural cells on all
scaffolds.Overall, our results showed differentiation of SADS
cells to early and mature progenitor neural cells on
nanofibrous scaffolds. PCL/gelatin/PRP nanofibrous
scaffolds can serve as a good substrate for proliferation
and differentiation of SADS cells to nerve cells and act
as a good candidate for further in vivo experiments and
nerve tissue engineering applications.
Conclusion
We have revealed that stem cells derived from scalp
adipose tissue could be isolated rapidly and simply.
These stem cells were similar to other adipose-derived
stem cells. Our results provide significant information
regarding the optimum isolation of MSCs from adipose
tissue for increasing clinical applications. Our data
suggest that human SADS cells may have the potential
to differentiate into early and mature progenitor of
neurons, in vitro. Coating of nanofibrous scaffolds with
PRP influenced the morphology and proliferation of
SADS cells seeded on the nanofibrous scaffolds. PCL/
gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds coated with PRP were found
to be the best substrate for SADS cells in terms of cell
proliferation and morphology which make these scaffolds
marked candidates for further in vivo experiments and
nerve tissue engineering applications.
Authors: Patricia A Zuk; Min Zhu; Peter Ashjian; Daniel A De Ugarte; Jerry I Huang; Hiroshi Mizuno; Zeni C Alfonso; John K Fraser; Prosper Benhaim; Marc H Hedrick Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Y D Halvorsen; D Franklin; A L Bond; D C Hitt; C Auchter; A L Boskey; E P Paschalis; W O Wilkison; J M Gimble Journal: Tissue Eng Date: 2001-12
Authors: Peter H Ashjian; Amir S Elbarbary; Brian Edmonds; Daniel DeUgarte; Min Zhu; Patricia A Zuk; H Peter Lorenz; Prosper Benhaim; Marc H Hedrick Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.730