Literature DB >> 29633268

Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Christopher G Hutton1, Georgia K Johnson2, Christopher A Barwacz3, Veerasathpurush Allareddy4, Gustavo Avila-Ortiz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current evidence supports the positive effect of adequate peri-implant mucosal thickness (PMT) on both marginal bone level stability and esthetic outcomes. While the subepithelial connective tissue graft (sCTG) has been traditionally considered as the gold standard for peri-implant mucosal augmentation, acellular dermal matrix (ADM) may be a valid alternative. The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial was to determine the clinical efficacy of ADM in the augmentation of PMT as compared to an autologous sCTG.
METHODS: Patients who could benefit from peri-implant mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement were recruited. Participants were randomized to the control (simultaneous sCTG) or test (simultaneous ADM) group. The primary outcome in this study was changes in PMT between baseline and 16 weeks later. Keratinized mucosal width (KMW) changes, modified wound healing index (MWHI) variations and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded, as well.
RESULTS: A total of 20 participants were recruited per an a priori power analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between groups at baseline for any of the parameters analyzed. The gain in PMT at 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm from the expected mucosal margin was 0.44 ± 2.04 mm, 1.20 ± 1.48 mm, and 1.20 ± 0.89 mm in the sCTG group, and 0.05 ± 1.57 mm, 0.85 ± 1.29 mm, and 1.45 ± 1.17 mm in the ADM group. No statistically significant differences in terms of PMT, KMW, and MWHI changes were observed between groups. The perceived discomfort was higher at 2 and 4 weeks for patients in the sCTG group.
CONCLUSION: ADM produces similar outcomes to sCTG in terms of mucosal augmentation at the time of implant placement.
© 2018 American Academy of Periodontology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acellular dermis; alveolar ridge augmentation; connective tissue; dental implants, single-tooth; randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29633268     DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  4 in total

1.  Resolution of Abfraction-Associated Gingival Fenestration Utilizing Connective Tissue Grafting.

Authors:  Braydon Haskell; J Kobi Stern; Jordan Ghiassi; Andrew Kurialacherry; Sadja Gaud-Quintana; Mark E Peacock
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2019-06-12

2.  How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts.

Authors:  Martin Lissek; Martin Boeker; Arndt Happe
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Does simultaneous soft tissue augmentation around immediate or delayed dental implant placement using sub-epithelial connective tissue graft provide better outcomes compared to other treatment options? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Taghrid Aldhohrah; Ge Qin; Dongliang Liang; Wanxing Song; Linhu Ge; Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah; Liping Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Kathrin Becker; Stefan P Bienz; Christer Dahlin; Nikos Donos; Christian Hammächer; Gerhard Iglhaut; Antonio Liñares; Alberto Ortiz-Vigón; Nerea Sanchez; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Daniel S Thoma; Cristina Valles; Dietmar Weng; José Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.