| Literature DB >> 29633040 |
Apichart Vanavichit1,2,3, Wintai Kamolsukyeunyong4, Meechai Siangliw4, Jonaliza L Siangliw4, Suniyom Traprab5, Siriphat Ruengphayak6, Ekawat Chaichoompu6, Chatree Saensuk6, Ekapol Phuvanartnarubal6, Theerayut Toojinda4,7, Somvong Tragoonrung8.
Abstract
The world-renowned Thai Hom Mali Rice has been the most important aromatic rice originating in Thailand. The aromatic variety was collected from Chachoengsao, a central province, and after pure-line selection, it was officially named as Khao Dawk Mali 105, (KDML105). Because of its superb fragrance and cooking quality, KDML105 has been a model variety for studying genes controlling grain quality and aroma. The aromatic gene was cloned in KDML105, as an amino aldehyde dehydrogenase (AMADH) or better known as BADH2 located on chromosome 8. Later on, all other aromatic rice genes were discovered as allelic to the AMADH. As a selection of local landrace variety found in rainfed areas, the Thai Jasmine rice showed adaptive advantages over improved irrigated rice in less fertile lowland rainfed conditions. Because KDML105 was susceptible to most diseases and insect pests, marker-assisted backcross selection (MABC) was used for the genetic improvement since 2000. After nearly 17 years of MABC for integrating new traits into KDML105, a new generation of KDML105, designated HM84, was developed which maintains the cooking quality and fragrance, and has gained advantages during flash flooding, disease, and insect outbreak.Entities:
Keywords: Amino aldehyde dehydrogenase; Bacterial blight resistance; Blast resistance; Brown planthopper tolerance; Flooding tolerance; Gene pyramiding; Marker-assisted backcross selection; Oryza sativa L; Thai Hom Mali
Year: 2018 PMID: 29633040 PMCID: PMC5891439 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-018-0212-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Geographical distribution of Thai Hom Mali rice, RD6, photoperiod insensitive aromatic and non-aromatic rice cultivars, in relation to abiotic stresses drought, salinity, and flooding, in the lowland rainfed area in Thailand
KASP SNP markers for specific gene target used for MABC for improving KDML105
| Traits | Marker Name | Chr. | QTL/gene | LGC codef |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aroma | Aroma_2-3e | 8 |
| 002–0829.1 |
| Amylose content (AC) | wx_5UTR_G/Ta | 6 |
| 002–0052.1 |
| Gelatinization temperature (GT) | ALK_ex8_SNP_GC/TTa | 6 |
| 002–0049.1 |
| Bacterial leaf blight (BLB) | xa5a | 5 |
| 002–0775.1 |
| Bacterial leaf blight (BLB) | SNP_P100 Xa21e | 11 |
| 002–0998.1 |
| Brown planthopper (BPH) | OsSTPS2_21bp_delb | 4 |
| 002–0120.1 |
| Brown planthopper (BPH) | OsLecRK3_QBPHRe | 4 |
| 002–0263.1 |
| Brown planthopper (BPH) | Bph32_2_1223332e | 6 |
| |
| Blast (BL) | BLch11-Pikm-2c,d | 11 |
| 002–0754.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI055578_TC_Chr1a | 1 |
| 002–0768.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI055841a | 1 |
| 002–0819.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI453126a | 11 |
| 002–0820.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI453598a | 11 |
| 002–0821.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI454069a | 11 |
| 002–0822.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI454717a | 11 |
| 002–0823.1 |
| Blast (BL) | TBGI454800a | 11 |
| 002–0824.1 |
| Submergence (SUB) | Sub1A_SNP1e | 9 |
| 002–0152.1 |
| Submergence (SUB) | Sub1C_loci5a | 9 |
| 002–0995.1 |
a Ruengphayak et al.; 2015
b Kamolsukyunyong et al.; 2013
c Chaipanya et al. 2017
d Ashikawa et al.; 2012
eUupublished
f LGCgroup, 2015
Pyramiding nine target genes/QTLs into the KDML105 background by marker-assisted backcrossing illustrated in Fig. 2. Background selection with markers was conducted only in the Plus-1 and Plus-4 BILs. X= The gene/QTLs were added to the new varieties by backcrossing
TPS Terpene synthase (OsSTPS2)
Fig. 2Schematic development of KDML105 from a well-adapted, local aromatic rice cultivar to new KDML-like rice varieties with resistance to submergence, bacterial leaf blight, leaf/neck blast, and brown planthopper using comprehensive marker-assisted gene/QTL pyramiding backcross breeding
Planting area of the Thai Jasmine rice (KDML105 + RD15), KDML-derived varieties, RD6, RD51, RD33, and Pathumthani 1 (PTT1), in the wet and dry seasons, 2013–14 (Unpublished Rice Department 2014)
| Varieties | Area (ha) | Total (ha) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wet season | Dry season | ||
| KDML105 | 3,870,560 | 3630 | 3,874,190 |
| RD15 | 238,470 | 1580 | 240,050 |
| RD6 | 1,407,250 | 390 | 1,407,640 |
| RD51 | 3170 | 290 | 3460 |
| RD33 | 110 | 2950 | 3060 |
| PTT1 | 8900 | 46,110 | 55,010 |
| Total (ha) | 5,528,460 | 54,950 | 5,583,410 |
Trait evaluation, agronomic characteristics, grain quality, and cooking quality traits of the four selected HomMali 84, KDML105, and KD EDVs (For trait evaluation methods, see Additional file 1)
| Name | HM84 progenies | KDML105 | KD EDV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KD-BLB | Plus III | RD6-Blast | KD-Rathu | ||||||
| 6_14G08 | 24_16D06 | 2_14A03 | 4_14B09 | ||||||
| aSub | 84.67 | 55.00 | 49.00 | 63.67 | 7.00 | 5.3 | 75.7 | 33.3 | 6.5 |
| BLB(4 isolates) | R | R | R | R | S | R | R | S | S |
| BPH (2 biotype) | R | R | R | MR | S | S | MR | S | R |
| Blast (8 Mixed) | R | R | R | R | S | S | S | R | S |
| bDM | 126.67 | 125.33 | 129.00 | 120.33 | 120.67 | 120.33 | 122.00 | 121.67 | 127.30 |
| NTP | 13.00 | 10.00 | 12.33 | 13.67 | 14.33 | 9.00 | 13.67 | 8.33 | 12.67 |
| PH(cm) | 112.80 | 114.77 | 112.10 | 113.97 | 98.23 | 101.33 | 113.33 | 110.23 | 99.77 |
| PSF(%) | 72.33 | 72.27 | 71.07 | 68.57 | 68.10 | 60.27 | 77.27 | 55.07 | 74.33 |
| TGW(g) | 30.03 | 29.93 | 27.80 | 27.90 | 29.93 | 29.65 | 28.89 | 26.33 | 27.97 |
| GY(kg/ha) | 2766.69 | 2887.50 | 2266.69 | 2833.31 | 2554.19 | 2360.44 | 3130.31 | 2795.81 | 2921.06 |
| cBR1/ (%) | 76.06 | 73.39 | 68.10 | 73.03 | 70.40 | 70.64 | 69.48 | 72.54 | 71.88 |
| HR1/ (%) | 62.08 | 61.26 | 55.02 | 49.00 | 57.84 | 50.44 | 51.49 | 58.14 | 58.85 |
| GL/W1/ | 3.4 | 3.16 | 3.2 | 3.29 | 3.42 | 3.24 | 3.22 | 3.11 | 3.15 |
| PRL1/ (cm) | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.72 | 0.7 | 0.71 | 0.7 | 0.67 |
| ASV1/ | 6.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 2.3 | 6 | 6.1 | 6.2 |
| Amylose(%) | 16.42 | 17.7 | 14.14 | 14.55 | 17 | 16.58 | 17.21 | 8.2 | 16.94 |
a/Trait evaluation
Sub = Average % plant survival (%PS) after 15 days of flash flooding
BLB = average lesion length in centimeters of the damage caused by the BB isolate including TXO152, TXO85, TXO155 and TXO156
BPH = Severity scores with UBN biotype at 9 DAI when TN1, the susceptible control died
Blast = Average blast injury score when attacked by 8 mixed blast isolates from Thailand
b/Agronomic characteristics
DM (days to maturity), NTP (number of tillers per plant), PH (plant height from the soil surface to the neck of the panicle), PSF (percent spikelet fertility), TGW (1000-grain weight) and GY (grain yield)
c/Grain quality and cooking quality
BR (brown rice), HR (head rice), GL/W (grain length-width ratio), PRL (polished rice length), AC (amylose content; Julaino, 1971), ASV (alkaline spreading value)
EDV = Essentially-derived variety