Focke Ziemssen1, Alan Cruess2, Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf3, Philippe Margaron3, Howard Snow3, William David Strain4. 1. Center for Ophthalmology, Eberhard Karl University of Tuebingen, Germany. 2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. 3. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Diabetes and Vascular Medicine, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The structured Benefit-risk Action Team (BRAT) approach aims to assist healthcare decision makers in treatment assessments. We applied BRAT to compare the benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: One-year data for the ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) and laser arms of the phase III trials RESPOND (NCT01135914; n=220), RESTORE (NCT00687804; n=345), and REVEAL (NCT00989989; n=396) were included in the analysis. The benefit measures included ≥10 letters gain/avoidance of loss in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), achieving central retinal thickness (CRT) <275 μm, and 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) outcomes. The risks measures included endophthalmitis, intraocular pressure increase, hypertension, proteinuria, arterial/venous thromboembolic events and deaths. RESULTS: Ranibizumab treatment provided significant benefits compared with laser for ≥10 letter BCVA gain at month 12 (387/1,000 versus 152/1,000 patients), CRT <275 μm at 12 months (474/1,000 versus 348/1,000 patients), and improvement of ≥6.06 on the VFQ-25 near activities subscale (325/1,000 versus 245/1,000 patients). Results for the risk measures were similar for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Superior clinically relevant outcomes were observed with ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN compared with laser without compromising on safety. This analysis further supports the positive benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN.
INTRODUCTION: The structured Benefit-risk Action Team (BRAT) approach aims to assist healthcare decision makers in treatment assessments. We applied BRAT to compare the benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus laser photocoagulation for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: One-year data for the ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN) and laser arms of the phase III trials RESPOND (NCT01135914; n=220), RESTORE (NCT00687804; n=345), and REVEAL (NCT00989989; n=396) were included in the analysis. The benefit measures included ≥10 letters gain/avoidance of loss in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), achieving central retinal thickness (CRT) <275 μm, and 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) outcomes. The risks measures included endophthalmitis, intraocular pressure increase, hypertension, proteinuria, arterial/venous thromboembolic events and deaths. RESULTS:Ranibizumab treatment provided significant benefits compared with laser for ≥10 letter BCVA gain at month 12 (387/1,000 versus 152/1,000 patients), CRT <275 μm at 12 months (474/1,000 versus 348/1,000 patients), and improvement of ≥6.06 on the VFQ-25 near activities subscale (325/1,000 versus 245/1,000 patients). Results for the risk measures were similar for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Superior clinically relevant outcomes were observed with ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN compared with laser without compromising on safety. This analysis further supports the positive benefit-risk profile of ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN.
Authors: Roy W Beck; Allison R Edwards; Lloyd P Aiello; Neil M Bressler; Frederick Ferris; Adam R Glassman; Elizabeth Hartnett; Michael S Ip; Judy E Kim; Craig Kollman Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-03
Authors: Bao-Anh Nguyen-Khoa; Earl L Goehring; Winifred Werther; Anne E Fung; Diana V Do; Rajendra S Apte; Judith K Jones Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Robert L Avery; Alessandro A Castellarin; Nathan C Steinle; Dilsher S Dhoot; Dante Joseph Pieramici; Robert See; Stephen Couvillion; Ma'an A Nasir; Melvin D Rabena; Kha Le; Mauricio Maia; Jennifer E Visich Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Christian Prünte; Franck Fajnkuchen; Sajjad Mahmood; Federico Ricci; Katja Hatz; Jan Studnička; Vladimir Bezlyak; Soumil Parikh; William John Stubbings; Andreas Wenzel; João Figueira Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 4.638