Literature DB >> 29632433

Sensitivity analysis of the near-road dispersion model RLINE - an evaluation at Detroit, Michigan.

Chad W Milando1, Stuart A Batterman1.   

Abstract

The development of accurate and appropriate exposure metrics for health effect studies of traffic-related air pollutants (TRAPs) remains challenging and important given that traffic has become the dominant urban exposure source and that exposure estimates can affect estimates of associated health risk. Exposure estimates obtained using dispersion models can overcome many of the limitations of monitoring data, and such estimates have been used in several recent health studies. This study examines the sensitivity of exposure estimates produced by dispersion models to meteorological, emission and traffic allocation inputs, focusing on applications to health studies examining near-road exposures to TRAP. Daily average concentrations of CO and NOx predicted using the Research Line source model (RLINE) and a spatially and temporally resolved mobile source emissions inventory are compared to ambient measurements at near-road monitoring sites in Detroit, MI, and are used to assess the potential for exposure measurement error in cohort and population-based studies. Sensitivity of exposure estimates is assessed by comparing nominal and alternative model inputs using statistical performance evaluation metrics and three sets of receptors. The analysis shows considerable sensitivity to meteorological inputs; generally the best performance was obtained using data specific to each monitoring site. An updated emission factor database provided some improvement, particularly at near-road sites, while the use of site-specific diurnal traffic allocations did not improve performance compared to simpler default profiles. Overall, this study highlights the need for appropriate inputs, especially meteorological inputs, to dispersion models aimed at estimating near-road concentrations of TRAPs. It also highlights the potential for systematic biases that might affect analyses that use concentration predictions as exposure measures in health studies, e.g., to estimate health impacts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RLINE; dispersion model; exposure; model evaluation; sensitivity analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 29632433      PMCID: PMC5889051          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  22 in total

1.  Temporal and spatial variation in allocating annual traffic activity across an urban region and implications for air quality assessments.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Transp Res D Transp Environ       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.495

2.  Ambient air pollution and asthma exacerbations in children: an eight-city analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Lianne Sheppard; Thomas Lumley; James C Slaughter; Jane Q Koenig; Gail G Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  On-road vehicle emission inventory and its uncertainty analysis for Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Haikun Wang; Changhong Chen; Cheng Huang; Lixin Fu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Temporal variation of traffic on highways and the development of accurate temporal allocation factors for air pollution analyses.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman; Richard Cook; Thomas Justin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Effects of improved spatial and temporal modeling of on-road vehicle emissions.

Authors:  Christian E Lindhjem; Alison K Pollack; Allison DenBleyker; Stephanie L Shaw
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Dispersion Modeling of Traffic-Related Air Pollutant Exposures and Health Effects Among Children with Asthma in Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman; Rajiv Ganguly; Vlad Isakov; Janet Burke; Saravanan Arunachalam; Michelle Snyder; Thomas Robins; Toby Lewis
Journal:  Transp Res Rec       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.560

7.  Comparing exposure assessment methods for traffic-related air pollution in an adverse pregnancy outcome study.

Authors:  Jun Wu; Michelle Wilhelm; Judith Chung; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Feasibility of assessing public health impacts of air pollution reduction programs on a local scale: New Haven case study.

Authors:  Danelle T Lobdell; Vlad Isakov; Lisa Baxter; Jawad S Touma; Mary Beth Smuts; Halûk Özkaynak
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Air pollution and daily hospital admissions in metropolitan Los Angeles.

Authors:  W S Linn; Y Szlachcic; H Gong; P L Kinney; K T Berhane
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A comparison of exposure metrics for traffic-related air pollutants: application to epidemiology studies in Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman; Janet Burke; Vlad Isakov; Toby Lewis; Bhramar Mukherjee; Thomas Robins
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.