Literature DB >> 29632099

Simultaneously Measured Interarm Blood Pressure Difference and Stroke: An Individual Participants Data Meta-Analysis.

Hirofumi Tomiyama1,2, Toshiaki Ohkuma3, Toshiharu Ninomiya4, Chisa Mastumoto3, Kazuomi Kario, Satoshi Hoshide, Yoshikuni Kita5, Toyoshi Inoguchi6, Yasutaka Maeda7, Katsuhiko Kohara8,9, Yasuharu Tabara10, Motoyuki Nakamura11, Takayoshi Ohkubo12, Hirotaka Watada13, Masanori Munakata14, Mitsuru Ohishi15, Norihisa Ito16, Michinari Nakamura17, Tetsuo Shoji8,18, Charalambos Vlachopoulos19, Akira Yamashina3.   

Abstract

We conducted individual participant data meta-analysis to examine the validity of interarm blood pressure difference in simultaneous measurement as a marker to identify subjects with ankle-brachial pressure index <0.90 and to predict future cardiovascular events. We collected individual participant data on 13 317 Japanese subjects from 10 cohorts (general population-based cohorts, cohorts of patients with past history of cardiovascular events, and those with cardiovascular risk factors). Binary logistic regression analysis with adjustments identified interarm blood pressure difference >5 mm Hg as being associated with a significant odds ratio for the presence of ankle-brachial pressure index <0.90 (odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-3.03; P<0.01). Among 11 726 subjects without a past history of cardiovascular disease, 249 developed stroke during the average follow-up period of 7.4 years. Interarm blood pressure difference >15 mm Hg was associated with a significant Cox stratified adjusted hazard ratio for subsequent stroke (hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-4.60; P<0.01). Therefore, interarm blood pressure differences, measured simultaneously in both arms, may be associated with vascular damage in the systemic arterial tree. These differences may be useful for identifying subjects with an ankle-brachial pressure index of <0.90 in the overall study population, and also a reliable predictor of future stroke in subjects without a past history of cardiovascular disease. These findings support the recommendation to measure blood pressure in both arms at the first visit.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; blood pressure; primary prevention; risk assessment; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29632099     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.10923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  7 in total

1.  Systolic inter-arm blood pressure difference and risk of cognitive decline in older people: a cohort study.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Daniel Thomas; David J Llewellyn; Luigi Ferrucci; Stefania Bandinelli; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference: non-persistence and association with incident cardiovascular disease in the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Daniel A Duprez; David R Jacobs; Leah I B Andrews; Lyndia C Brumback; Julie O Denenberg; Robyn L Mcclelland; Isac C Thomas; Michael H Criqui; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 3.  State of the Art Review: Brachial-Ankle PWV.

Authors:  Hirofumi Tomiyama; Kazuki Shiina
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.928

4.  Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Preferential Association with Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Masako Miyashima; Tetsuo Shoji; Yoshinori Kakutani; Yuko Yamazaki; Akinobu Ochi; Tomoaki Morioka; Kayo Shinohara-Mitsuki; Shinya Fukumoto; Atsushi Shioi; Masaaki Inaba; Masanori Emoto
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.928

5.  Associations Between Systolic Interarm Differences in Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes and Mortality: Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis, Development and Validation of a Prognostic Algorithm: The INTERPRESS-IPD Collaboration.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Fiona C Warren; Kate Boddy; Sinead T J McDonagh; Sarah F Moore; John Goddard; Nigel Reed; Malcolm Turner; Maria Teresa Alzamora; Rafel Ramos Blanes; Shao-Yuan Chuang; Michael Criqui; Marie Dahl; Gunnar Engström; Raimund Erbel; Mark Espeland; Luigi Ferrucci; Maëlenn Guerchet; Andrew Hattersley; Carlos Lahoz; Robyn L McClelland; Mary M McDermott; Jackie Price; Henri E Stoffers; Ji-Guang Wang; Jan Westerink; James White; Lyne Cloutier; Rod S Taylor; Angela C Shore; Richard J McManus; Victor Aboyans; John L Campbell
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Clinical relevance of double-arm blood pressure measurement and prevalence of clinically important inter-arm blood pressure differences in Indian primary care.

Authors:  Gurpreet S Wander; Sinead T J McDonagh; M Srinivasa Rao; R Alagesan; J C Mohan; Ajit Bhagwat; A K Pancholia; M Viswanathan; Manoj Bhavrilal Chopda; A Purnanand; P L N Kapardhi; Arun R Vadavi; R Selvaraj; Pankaj Aneja; Suhas Hardas; Neil Bordoloi; N Sivakadaksham; Nilesh Goswami; Christopher E Clark; Willem J Verberk
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 2.885

7.  Could the arm blood pressure measured with simultaneous bilateral arm method be used for hypertension diagnosis?

Authors:  Taixuan Wan; Yuanhao Wu; Ziqiang He; Hai Su
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.