Hannu Antero Luomajoki1, Maria Beatriz Bonet Beltran2, Silvia Careddu3, Christoph Michael Bauer4. 1. Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Technikumstrasse 71, Postfach, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland. Electronic address: luom@zhaw.ch. 2. Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Technikumstrasse 71, Postfach, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland. Electronic address: beabonet19@hotmail.com. 3. Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Technikumstrasse 71, Postfach, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; Physio & Sport Luzern, Bruchstrasse 11, 6003 Luzern, Switzerland. Electronic address: caredsil@zhaw.ch. 4. Zurich University of Applied Sciences ZHAW, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Technikumstrasse 71, Postfach, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland; University of Tampere, School of Medicine, Kalevantie 4, FI-33014, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. Electronic address: christoph.bauer@zhaw.ch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with low back pain (LBP) and movement control impairment (MVCI) show altered spinal movement patterns. Treatment that aims to change movement behaviour could benefit these patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of movement control exercise (MVCE) in terms of clinically relevant measures (disability and pain) on patients with NSLBP. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PUBMED and PEDro databases were searched for RCT's evaluating MVCE treatment in patients with NSLBP from review inception to April 2017. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data and outcomes. PEDro was used to assess methodological quality of the studies and the GRADE approach was used to assess the overall quality of evidence Data were combined using a random effects meta-analysis and reported as standardized mean differences (SMD). RESULTS: Eleven eligible RCT's including a total of 781 patients were found. Results show 'very low to moderate quality' evidence of a positive effect of MVCE on disability, both at the end of treatment and after 12 months (SMD -0.38 95%CI -0.68, -0.09 respectively 0.37 95%CI -0.61,-0.04). Pain intensity was significantly reduced after MVCE at the end of treatment (SMD -0.39 95%CI -0.69, -0.04), but not after 12 months (SMD -0.27, 95%CI -0.62, 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: MVCE intervention for people with NSLBP and MVCI appears to be more effective in improving disability compared to other interventions, both over the short and long term. Pain was reduced only in the short term. An important factor is the initial identification of patients with MVCI. Registration of the study: The study protocol registration number is CRD42016036662 on PROSPERO.
BACKGROUND:Patients with low back pain (LBP) and movement control impairment (MVCI) show altered spinal movement patterns. Treatment that aims to change movement behaviour could benefit these patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of movement control exercise (MVCE) in terms of clinically relevant measures (disability and pain) on patients with NSLBP. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PUBMED and PEDro databases were searched for RCT's evaluating MVCE treatment in patients with NSLBP from review inception to April 2017. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data and outcomes. PEDro was used to assess methodological quality of the studies and the GRADE approach was used to assess the overall quality of evidence Data were combined using a random effects meta-analysis and reported as standardized mean differences (SMD). RESULTS: Eleven eligible RCT's including a total of 781 patients were found. Results show 'very low to moderate quality' evidence of a positive effect of MVCE on disability, both at the end of treatment and after 12 months (SMD -0.38 95%CI -0.68, -0.09 respectively 0.37 95%CI -0.61,-0.04). Pain intensity was significantly reduced after MVCE at the end of treatment (SMD -0.39 95%CI -0.69, -0.04), but not after 12 months (SMD -0.27, 95%CI -0.62, 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: MVCE intervention for people with NSLBP and MVCI appears to be more effective in improving disability compared to other interventions, both over the short and long term. Pain was reduced only in the short term. An important factor is the initial identification of patients with MVCI. Registration of the study: The study protocol registration number is CRD42016036662 on PROSPERO.
Authors: Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten; Carina Boström; Åsa Dedering; Marie Halvorsen; Roman P Kuster; Lena Nilsson-Wikmar; Christina B Olsson; Graciela Rovner; Elena Tseli; Eva Rasmussen-Barr Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Per Kjaer; Alice Kongsted; Inge Ris; Allan Abbott; Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen; Ewa M Roos; Søren T Skou; Tonny Elmose Andersen; Jan Hartvigsen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Alejandro Caña-Pino; Luís Espejo-Antúnez; José Carmelo Adsuar; María Dolores Apolo-Arenas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annika Taulaniemi; Markku Kankaanpää; Marjo Rinne; Kari Tokola; Jari Parkkari; Jaana H Suni Journal: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Date: 2020-05-04