Literature DB >> 29630983

A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.

Brian J Linder1, John A Occhino2, Elizabeth B Habermann3, Amy E Glasgow3, Katherine A Bews3, Boris Gershman4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the perioperative morbidity of open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy using data on a contemporary nationwide cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the ACS (American College of Surgeons) NSQIP® (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) database to identify women who underwent abdominal or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy from 2010 to 2016. Associations of surgical approach with 30-day complications, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalization and reoperation were evaluated by logistic regression. Hospital readmission within 30 days was calculated by the person-years method and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: A total of 4,362 women underwent sacrocolpopexy, including abdominal sacrocolpopexy in 1,179 (27%) and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy in 3,183 (73%). The proportion of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy increased during the study period from 70% in 2010 to 82% in 2016. Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment groups aside from a higher rate of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.03) and higher preoperative albumin (p <0.0001) among abdominal sacrocolpopexy cases. Compared to abdominal sacrocolpopexy, minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with lower rates of 30-day complications (p = 0.001), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (p = 0.02), surgical site infections (p <0.0001), shorter hospitalization (p <0.0001) and fewer blood transfusions (p = 0.01). Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was also associated with a lower 30 person-days readmission rate (2% vs 2.7%, p ≤0.0001) and 30-day reoperation rate (1.1% vs 1.4%, p <0.0001). On multivariable analysis minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was independently associated with a reduced risk of 30-day complications (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28, 0.76, p = 0.002), blood transfusion (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15, 0.74, p = 0.007), prolonged hospitalization (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.12, 0.23, p <0.001) and readmission (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41, 0.96, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was associated with reduced rates of 30-day complications, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalization and hospital readmission compared to abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  minimally invasive surgical procedures; pelvic organ prolapse; postoperative complications; robotic surgical procedures; urinary bladder

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29630983     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.03.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Bowel preparation prior to minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica C Sassani; Kelly Kantartzis; Liwen Wu; Anthony Fabio; Halina M Zyczynski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Rachael D Sussman; Benoit Peyronnet; Benjamin M Brucker
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-09-01

3.  Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Pawel Mach; Cara Kaufold; Peter Rusch; Rainer Kimmig; Paul Buderath
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  New "Wrinkle Method" for Intracorporeal Anterior Vaginal Wall Plication during Sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Sa Ra Lee; Ju Hee Kim; Sung Hoon Kim; Hee Dong Chae
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Schachar; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

6.  Sacrocolpopexy: Patient Outcomes Support the Use of Non-Crosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrix as an Alternative to the Synthetic Polypropylene Mesh.

Authors:  Magdalene Karon; Somu Chatterjee
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2019-12-09

7.  Temporal Trends of Urogynecologic Mesh Reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Jessica C Sassani; Amanda M Artsen; Pamela A Moalli; Megan S Bradley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.623

8.  A Survey of Operative Techniques Used by Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgeons Performing Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy.

Authors:  Alexandra Dubinskaya; Kaitlin Renkosiak; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.