Literature DB >> 29630794

Retention of CAD/CAM resin composite crowns following different bonding protocols.

Amir H Nejat1, Jinwhan Lee2, Shreya Shah2, Chee Paul Lin3, Prajakta Kulkarni4, Ramakiran Chavali5, Nathaniel C Lawson6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and primers with a CAD/CAM resin composite block on its crown retention.
METHODS: 120 human molars were prepared with a 24° total convergence angle, 1.5 mm height, and axial walls in dentin. Surface area was measured by digital microscopy. Crowns were machined from CAD/CAM resin composite blocks. Teeth were randomly allocated to 12 groups (n= 10) based on possible combinations of three surface treatments: [Control, Alumina air abrasion (50-µm Al₂O₃ at 0.28 MPa) ]; 5% hydrofluoric acid etch (20-second scrub); silane application (with or without Kerr Silane primer); and adhesive application (with or without Optibond XTR Adhesive). Optibond XTR Adhesive was applied to the tooth preparations and crowns were bonded with MaxCem Elite cement. Crowns were fatigued for 100,000 cycles at 100 N in water and debonded in tension (1 mm/minute). Crown retention strength (maximum load/surface area) values were analyzed using a three-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc tests (α= 0.05).
RESULTS: Surface treatment, silane and adhesive applications independently affect retention force (P< 0.05). All interactions were not significant (P> 0.05). Alumina airborne abrasion surface treatment, silane and adhesive applications all improve retention strength. Therefore, CAD/CAM resin composite crowns can withstand debonding while undergoing mechanical fatigue. Although all forms of surface treatment and primer application improve bond strength, the highest mean retention strength values were recorded when the crowns were alumina particle abraded and coated with adhesive (with or without silane). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: In order to improve the bonding of resin composite crowns, application of alumina airborne particle abrasion and a coat of adhesive (proceeded by an optional coat of silane) is recommended. If hydrofluoric acid is utilized, the crowns should be treated with a coat of silane followed by adhesive application. Copyright©American Journal of Dentistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29630794      PMCID: PMC7135944     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  24 in total

1.  Clinical Bonding of Resin Nano Ceramic Restorations to Zirconia Abutments: A Case Series within a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ulf Schepke; Henny Ja Meijer; Karin M Vermeulen; Gerry M Raghoebar; Marco S Cune
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.932

2.  Reporting numeric values of complete crowns. Part 1: Clinical preparation parameters.

Authors:  Janine Tiu; Basil Al-Amleh; J Neil Waddell; Warwick J Duncan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Surface Evaluation of Polishing Techniques for New Resilient CAD/CAM Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Dennis J Fasbinder; Gisele F Neiva
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.843

4.  Treatment recommendations for single-unit crowns: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Michael S McCracken; David R Louis; Mark S Litaker; Helena M Minyé; Rahma Mungia; Valeria V Gordan; Don G Marshall; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses.

Authors:  Chenfeng Chen; Flávia Zardo Trindade; Niek de Jager; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Albert J Feilzer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Curing mode affects bond strength of adhesively luted composite CAD/CAM restorations to dentin.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Lührs; Pong Pongprueksa; Jan De Munck; Werner Geurtsen; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials.

Authors:  Marleen Peumans; Emilija Bajraktarova Valjakova; Jan De Munck; Cece Bajraktarova Mishevska; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites.

Authors:  A K Mainjot; N M Dupont; J C Oudkerk; T Y Dewael; M J Sadoun
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 6.116

9.  The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength Between CAD/CAM Blocks and Composite Resin.

Authors:  Mustafa Duzyol; Omer Sagsoz; Nurdan Polat Sagsoz; Nilgun Akgul; Mehmet Yildiz
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.

Authors:  Fatma A Shembish; Hui Tong; Marina Kaizer; Malvin N Janal; Van P Thompson; Niek J Opdam; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.304

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cement selection criteria for full coverage restorations: A comprehensive review of literature.

Authors:  Safoura Ghodsi; Sarah Arzani; Mina Shekarian; MohammadMostafa Aghamohseni
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-11-01

2.  Effect of Bonding Protocols on the Performance of Luting Agents Applied to CAD-CAM Composites.

Authors:  Bruna Hilgemberg; Fabiana Suelen Figuerêdo de Siqueira; Andres Felipe Millan Cardenas; Josiane Loch Ribeiro; Andrés Dávila-Sánchez; Salvatore Sauro; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Cesar Augusto Galvao Arrais
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.748

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.