| Literature DB >> 29630667 |
Shintaro Onishi1, Mayu Ishino2, Hidefumi Kitazawa1, Ai Yoto1, Yuki Shimba2, Yusuke Mochizuki2, Keiko Unno3, Shinichi Meguro1, Ichiro Tokimitsu1, Shinji Miura2.
Abstract
Muscle atrophy (loss of skeletal muscle mass) causes progressive deterioration of skeletal function. Recently, excessive intake of fats was suggested to induce insulin resistance, followed by muscle atrophy. Green tea extracts (GTEs), which contain polyphenols such as epigallocatechin gallate, have beneficial effects on obesity, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance, but their effects against muscle atrophy are still unclear. Here, we found that GTEs prevented high-fat (HF) diet-induced muscle weight loss in senescence-accelerated mouse prone-8 (SAMP8), a murine model of senescence. SAMP8 mice were fed a control diet, an HF diet, or HF with 0.5% GTEs (HFGT) diet for 4 months. The HF diet induced muscle weight loss with aging (measured as quadriceps muscle weight), whereas GTEs prevented this loss. In HF diet-fed mice, blood glucose and plasma insulin concentrations increased in comparison with the control group, and these mice had insulin resistance as determined by homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). In these mice, serum concentrations of leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin 2 (LECT2), which is known to induce insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, were elevated, and insulin signaling in muscle, as determined by the phosphorylation levels of Akt and p70 S6 kinases, tended to be decreased. In HFGT diet-fed mice, these signs of insulin resistance and elevation of serum LECT2 were not observed. Although our study did not directly show the effect of serum LECT2 on muscle weight, insulin resistance examined using HOMA-IR indicated an intervention effect of serum LECT2 on muscle weight, as revealed by partial correlation analysis. Accordingly, GTEs might have beneficial effects on age-related and HF diet-induced muscle weight loss, which correlates with insulin resistance and is accompanied by a change in serum LECT2.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29630667 PMCID: PMC5891070 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of experimental diets fed to mice.
| Cont | HF | HFGT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lard | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Corn oil | 5 | 25 | 25 |
| Potato starch | 66.5 | 28.5 | 28 |
| Sucrose | 0 | 13 | 13 |
| Casein | 20 | 20 | 20 |
| Cellulose | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Vitamins (AIN-76) | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Minerals (AIN-76) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Green tea extracts (GTEs) | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Energy | % | ||
| Protein | 20.5 | 15.7 | 15.8 |
| Fat | 11.3 | 51.7 | 51.9 |
| Carbohydrate | 68.2 | 32.6 | 32.3 |
Cont, control diet; HF, high-fat diet; HFGT, HF with 0.5% GTEs diet; diet compositions are indicated in % (w/w).
a Obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan)
b Obtained from Mitsui Norin Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan)
c Percent of kcal of each macronutrient
Other ingredients were obtained from Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).
Catechin composition of GTEs.
| EGCg, epigallocatechin gallate | 71.68 |
| ECg, epicatechin gallate | 16.15 |
| GCg, gallocatechin gallate | 6.25 |
| EGC, epigallocatechin | 2.76 |
| EC, epicatechin | 1.24 |
| Cg, catechin gallate | 0.77 |
| GC, gallocatechin | 0.65 |
| C, catechin | 0.24 |
| Others | 0.26 |
| Total | 100(%) |
GTE purity was 77.58%
Caffeine content was 0.20% of total GTEs
Fig 1Body weight and skeletal muscle weight in aging SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice.
Body weight (A) and skeletal muscle weight (B) were measured in young (2M) and adult (6M) mice fed a Cont diet. Skeletal muscle weight increased in SAMR1 mice concomitantly with body weight gain, but did not increase in SAMP8 mice. Data are means ± S.D. (8 to 16 mice per group). Statistical significance of the interaction between mouse strain (SAMR1 and SAMP8) and age (2M and 6M) was determined by two-way factorial ANOVA without replication, and Student’s t-test was used for comparison between the two age groups. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.
Fig 2Body weight and skeletal muscle weight in SAMP8 mice on different diets.
Body weight (A); skeletal muscle weight (B). Skeletal muscle loss with aging was exacerbated by an HF diet (2M Cont vs. 6M HF; P = 0.016) but was significantly prevented by GTEs in the HFGT group (HF vs. HFGT; P = 0.002). Data are means ± S.D. (8 to 16 mice per group). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for comparison among groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
Fig 4Phosphorylation of kinases involved in insulin signaling in skeletal muscle of adult (6M) SAMP8 mice.
Representative western blot images (upper panels, all images provided in S1 Appendix) and quantification of phosphorylation (lower graphs) are shown for Akt (A) and S6K (B). Data are means ± S.D. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for comparison among groups. *, P < 0.05.
Matrix of bivariate correlations among muscle weight, HOMA-IR, and serum LECT2.
| Variable | HOMA-IR | Serum LECT2 | Muscle weight | |
| HOMA-IR | Pearson correlation | 1 | 0.437 | −0.455 |
| 0.007 | 0.005 | |||
| Serum LECT2 | Pearson correlation | 1 | −0.333 | |
| 0.033 | ||||
| Muscle weight | Pearson correlation | 1 | ||
*Correlation is significant at the P < 0.05 level (1-tailed)
**Correlation is significant at the P < 0.01 level (1-tailed)
Partial correlations among muscle weight, HOMA-IR, and serum LECT2.
| Control variable | Variable | Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Serum LECT2 | HOMA-IR & Muscle weight | -0.365 | 0.024 |
| HOMA-IR | Serum LECT2 & Muscle weight | -0.168 | 0.188 |
| Muscle weight | HOMA-IR & Serum LECT2 | 0.340 | 0.033 |
*Correlation is significant at the P < 0.05 level (1-tailed)
Fig 3Blood glucose, plasma insulin, HOMA-IR, and serum LECT2 concentrations in SAMP8 mice.
Blood glucose levels were analyzed at dissection after 5 h of fasting by ACCU-CHEK Aviva described in Materials and Methods (A). Plasma insulin (B) and serum LECT2 (D) concentrations were analyzed after serum and plasma sample collection by enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay. HOMA-IR was calculated as described in the Materials and Methods (C). Data are means ± S.D. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test was used for comparison among groups. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.